Yahoo Offers Refunds Or DRM-Free Music In Exchange For Shutting Down DRM Servers
from the that's-better dept
We were a bit surprised last week when Yahoo decided to shut down its DRM servers, rendering all sorts of "purchased" music close to worthless. After all, when Microsoft had done the same thing, public outcry forced Microsoft to keep the servers running for a few more years. Now Yahoo has leapfrogged that decision, promising either refunds or a replacement DRM-free version of tracks that you downloaded via its service. This may turn out to be expensive for Yahoo, but that's what the company gets for agreeing to a DRM'd solution in the first place, rather than trusting its instincts and telling the labels to ditch the DRM years ago.What's more interesting about this is that retailers may need to start matching this offer. In other words, people are now (reasonably) expecting retailers to "future proof" their music, so that they don't have to buy the same songs over and over again. If people are buying music, they expect to be able to continue to use that music no matter how the technology changes -- and they're pushing to make sure that happens. Yahoo's decision to now make its music (even as its shutting down the music service) future proof should make the recording industry realize that the days of getting consumers to rebuy all their music every time there's a format shift are long gone.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Format Change
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Format Change
Problem solved. Legally. Now how do I do that with my DRM'd downloads?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Format Change
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Format Change
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Format Change
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Format Change
I agree with artists being compensated for their work, but it blows me away that music vendors have the audacity to sell "privileges" of things customers are plenty able to do for themselves. That's like me selling a door but then telling people they cannot drill a hole in it without notifying me first; they aren't trying to sell it to someone else (not that it'd matter in this case since the door is not digital).
If I pay for a song, I always rip it into a DRM-free format, but I don't share it with other people.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Format Change
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Format Shifting
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: as if
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
re: Format Change
And how does this encourage people to buy legal music? I'd much rather download free music illegally and never have to worry about this bullshit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: re: Format Change
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
never got this
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: never got this
In 1998 you had to have a pretty fast computer to be able to rip/convert cd's, and you often got skips etc, as it just wasn't so good. Now it's easy as anything.
I think if someone were to offer a $50/month media service that included movies and music, people would go for it... Otherwise pricing will need to drop a bit, and be without DRM schemes, for long-term success. iTMS proved that digital distribution can work... now it's time to realize that DRM-free is cheaper, easier, and more effective in the long term.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: never got this
I sure would. Who the heck wants to worry about managing a library, backing it up, and so on. Just provide me an online "all you can eat" type service and pay royatlies based on usage patterns.
If you have cable or satellite than you probably have 100+ channels, do you watch them all, no, do you pay $50 to $150 a month, yep!
Freedom
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
re: JB's post
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DRM rip off
i wish someone would make it easy to keep the stuff i already bought and put it on my cd's, update my mp3 player and enjoy the streaming subscriptions too. I am guessing raphasody will be just as much as a PITA, but i don't want to buy hard copies from the music stores, (dont like having to buy whole cd's just to get one song) and i don't want to download illegally either.
would someone give me a viable option?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: DRM rip off
The more people that voice their opinions to their elected representatives the faster our laws will get changed to something more reasonable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: DRM rip off
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: DRM rip off
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why not? By choosing to abide by the recording industry's terms, you help perpetuate a system that does not bring value to the market anynmore. The only value they ever brought was marketing and distribution - the internet does that now, better and much cheaper.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: never got this - by matt
Yes, vinyl keeps well if you don't scratch it or break it. However, VHS and audio tapes don't naturally keep well for very long. VHS in particular degrades over the years, no matter how well you keep it. (Which is why so many broadcasting stations were previously pissed off and went back to Beta [so I heard.])
Personally, I have a collection of audio tapes that have simply lost their fidelity, and as such I repurchased them as CDs. I keep those CDs in good condition by archiving them and replaying the ripped content.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yes, but you still cannot just buy mp3's thru the iTunes store :(
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DRM and Ripping
http://www.moserbaerhomevideo.com/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]