JPEG Patent's Single Claim Rejected (And Smacked Down For Good Measure)
from the a-good-first-step dept
We've been covering the ongoing saga of an old patent we've referred to as the "JPEG Patent." This actually isn't the first patent we've called the JPEG Patent, because multiple people claimed to hold patents over the technology that goes into a JPEG image. But, this one was rather special. The patent had been used, repeatedly, by lawyer Ray Niro, against a wide range of opponents, including a patent system critic. The end result was a drawn out review process where all of the original claims were rejected, but a single new claim was added to the patent, which Niro insisted covered JPEGs on a website.Earlier this year, the Patent Office agreed to re-examine that claim. On top of that, a judge overseeing one of the lawsuits involving the patent decided to put the suit on hold pending the outcome of the re-exam. Of course, the re-exam will take some time, but the initial re-exam came out recently and it does not look good for this patent:
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: jpeg patent, patents, re-exam, rejection
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As someone who reads a lot of Office Actions, I've never seen a patent examiner spend so many pages trashing a single claim. It could be that the Patent Office assigned its "A-Team" to this patent given its storied history and the high profile treatment it receives from this blog and others.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh....nothing much!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Oh....nothing much!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Oh....nothing much!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Oh....nothing much!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Oh....nothing much!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
God, How retarded!
Its used everywhere and just as much as college ruled paper!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: God, How retarded!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: God, How retarded!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What's with the nonstandard format?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
proofreading/sorry mike
[that "while" should be a "why"]
--Glenn
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
JPEG; Joint Photographic Experts Group
mainly for transmission of photos from space
craft.
I suppose one of the members could have pulled
a rambus and gone after a patent but there was
more integrity in the JPEG group.
They started work about 1987 and the first draft
was released around 1990. Digital Equipment Corp.
was one of the consortium members.
At least that's how I remember it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Retroactive Innovation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
JPEG viability
[ link to this | view in chronology ]