Garfield Minus Garfield Gets Its Own Book... And No Lawsuits, Either!
from the amazing dept
Back in June, we noted how sad it was that we were all so happy that Garfield creator Jim Davis didn't freak out about the derivative comic strip "Garfield Minus Garfield." In this day and age, we're so used to creators sending out cease and desist letters and claiming "ownership" that it was refreshing to see a content creator actually happy about someone building (or, in this case, subtracting) off his work. This should be the norm -- but instead it's a unique thing. Witness the silly spat over who "owns" Flat Stanley, for example.However, the Jim Davis/Garfield thing is getting even better. It appears that Davis' publisher, Ballantine Books, has worked out an agreement with the creator of Garfield Minus Garfield to publish a book of those strips as well, and they're doing it in conjunction with a 30th anniversary Garfield book. And, once again, Jim Davis seems thrilled about the whole thing:
"I think it's an inspired thing to do. I want to thank Dan for enabling me to see another side of Garfield. Some of the strips he chose were slappers: 'Oh, I could have left that out.' It would have been funnier."I look forward to a day when the idea that someone being thrilled that they inspired someone else's creative works as a derivative of their own isn't newsworthy. In the meantime, kudos to Jim Davis, Ballantine... and, most importantly, Dan Walsh for his creativity in coming up with Garfield Minus Garfield in the first place.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, dan walsh, derivative works, garfield, garfield minus garfield, jim davis
Companies: ballantine books
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Nice...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Nice...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Nice...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
While I have no doubt that at least some of the Garfield without Garfield comics would constitute a parody of the original work, that would not exempt them from copyright infringement because they use the actual copyrighted work. Thus, the Garfield without Garfield comments are true derivative works.
In the same way, I couldn't remix Metallica songs to take away the guitars, without violating Metallica's copyrights.
Thus, the cool thing here is that Jim Davis simply does not care about the infringement and is embracing it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the devil called...
in other news: flying pigs create havoc in the aircraft control network. government bailouts eminent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: the devil called...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Originality is overrated
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The canon for Garfield is that Jon owns a cat (garfield) but can't hear/read his thoughts. So having Garfield there but just removing the thought bubbles is funnier than removing garfield entirely.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
too soon to call it victory
Hasbro only went after scrablous once it realized it couldnt compete with it.
WWF (world wildlife foundation) only went after WWF (word wrestling federation) when the later became so popular.
the list goes on.
concerning Flat Stanley the original author had no issues with the teacher he actually realized that if it wasn't for him flat Stanley would be dead, its only after his death that this all started but again when the website became so popular ....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: too soon to call it victory
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: too soon to call it victory
I think Hasbro only went after Scrabulous after EA came to them and said "hey your missing out on a bunch of money here, let us handle everything and you just sit back and collect a check". The entire situation "reaks" of EA to be honest.
"concerning Flat Stanley the original author had no issues with the teacher he actually realized that if it wasn't for him flat Stanley would be dead, its only after his death that this all started but again when the website became so popular ...."
I believe the problem here is the teacher attempted to get the name copywrited (or trademakred?) and the family said "hey just a minute now . . . "
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: too soon to call it victory
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Except he didn't. The concept has been around the internet long before Walsh stole it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
http://garfieldminusgarfield-faq.tumblr.com/post/44498653/the-garfield-minus-garfield-faq
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He gets it . . .
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Awesome
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
an arbuckle thanksgiving...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_KVsQXeE6A
The same guy did one for the Christmas Special too. The endings are amazing too. I can't believe someone took the time to do these...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]