Police And Newspaper Say The Internet Turned 10,000 Australian Kids On To Crime
from the sensationalism-at-every-corner dept
madlep writes in to point us to a story out of Australia, where police in Victoria are blaming the internet for a recent rise in youth crimes. Of course, this seems to go against almost all other evidence, but why let that stop a little fear mongering:The head of the police youth affairs office, Inspector Steve Soden, said too many children were viewing inappropriate content on the internet and this, coupled with boredom due to a lack of community services on Melbourne's fringes, was behind the alarming rise in youth crime.Does he have any evidence of this? Nope. But it doesn't stop the newspaper from going with the headline: "Net blamed as 10,000 kids turn to crime." In fact, buried way down towards the end of the article, is the news of an actual research paper that looked into what was causing the growth in youth crime:
The paper says social factors, including unemployment, drug and alcohol abuse, sexual abuse and homelessness, contribute to youth crime. But the two key factors influencing young offenders are poor parenting and schooling.Notice that the internet is totally absent. Yet, why is this fact buried in the 13th paragraph, when the headline and the first few paragraphs blame the internet?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: australia, moral panic, technopanic, youth crime, youth violence
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's the fault of those damn Australian branded communities!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Agrestic
The kids there don't have anything to do other than steal security cameras and smoke/deal pot.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The game made me do it ....
The music made me do it ....
The book made me do it ....
and now ....
The INTERNET made me do it.
nah, This BS is going to make me DO IT!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
So perhaps since there has been a recent up-shot in piracy around the horn of Africa, we can expect a slight drop in global avg temps!?!
Personally I think that the youth doing anything parents don't like (en masse) causes stupidity, because they don't want to face the fact that they are being shitty parents...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Headlines
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
intro to logic 101....
"The paper says social factors, including unemployment, drug and alcohol abuse, sexual abuse and homelessness, contribute to youth crime. But the two key factors influencing young offenders are poor parenting and schooling."
yes of course the above mentioned issues are quite insignificant so the main reason must be the Internet.
that makes me wonder is the Internet only available in Australia?
because that seems to be the only place were Internet is causing rise in youth crimes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In other news...
An Australian research group says alcoholic beverages are to blame for excessive drinking, guns are cause of violent crimes and cars should be banned because they cause traffic violations.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I did it
I felt like it
It felt good
It seemed like a good idea at the time
It was reasonably priced and socially acceptable
Everybody's doin it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who knows?
But then, as others have mentioned before, the same goes for children/teens/whoever listening to angry music and committing violent crime, or depressing music and killing themselves. The trouble is people want to blame someone or something they have the power to control (or at least think they do), and avoid looking any further once they've got their hands on one.
In my own desire to do just that, I'll blame schools for not teaching statistics properly. If people were aware of the difference between correlation and causation, this sort of thing wouldn't happen. Yeah. That's the ticket :P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Its assumed that the PD and paper are just implying there is bad/harmful content on the internet. The result of having content categorized as bad/harmful results in some sort of shift in the behavioral development of the youth. We see this claim applied to Tv, movies, video games, etc.. (Usually its directed at a company instead of general area like the internet. This way someone can sue Rockstar because they feel the video game made their kid steal a car)
Lets forget that there is no scientific at all proving this erroneous claim. Lets look at the other side of the coin for a second. If bad content results in bad behavior then it would stand to reason that good content would also equate to good behavoir. To make the assumption that there is no content on the internet that is beneficial is just not accurate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What Evidence Again Do U want??
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What Evidence Again Do U want??
Its amazing! You have discovered how to accomplish what almost every correctional institution in the U.S. has struggle with.
I will tell you what. Lets put your theory to the test.We will find serial killer Richard Ramirez and have him watch whatever good content you like. Then after about 5 years of watching the good content we release him into your custody and he can stay at your house with your family. Of course your steadfast positive that your theory is true so there is no need to worry. Richard Ramirez will be fully rehabilitated because he has been watching nothing but good content.
Of course I hardly believe you are that convinced of your own argument. You are just taking a huge guess at the topic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
duh
Not that it's right but we all know the real reasons.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Check yourself...
The headline is to catch the eye, sell a paper. They did put the truth in there, and to say it's "buried" is to say you don't think the last half of a story is important. Sometimes the last sentance is the most important.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Teenagers did it . . . .
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I didn't need an internet when I was a kid to do something stupid and illegal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]