Connecticut Gives Up Banning Cameraphones In Court Rooms
from the still-can't-use-them,-though dept
It's been somewhat amusing watching as various folks overreacted to the rise of cameraphones over the past few years, with some companies banning them entirely, and a few clueless industry analysts insisting that they were just a fad that should be banned from any workplace. However, as cameraphones have become much more common, it seems that this mass hysteria is, thankfully, dying down. Over in Connecticut, they've even backed down on a rule that banned cameraphones in the court room. You're still not allowed to use them, but the courts realized now that nearly every mobile phone is a cameraphone, that it was becoming ridiculously time consuming to stop everyone from entering the courthouse, and make them tag and bag every mobile phone for storage and later pickup. Apparently, the lines to get into the courthouse were getting rather long.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cameraphones, connecticut, courts
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Wouldn't it make more sense to require all cell phones be turned off? Any that ring would be finable for contempt of court.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
** correction **
"Are you sure "branded community" isn't trademarked?"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It's been tried.
Of course, that was over the top.
It would probably be just as disruptive trying to hunt down the offending cell phone as the phone going off itself. Although if the person got the phone out and started talking on it, disrupting the courtroom... Hmm, are there provisions already in place for disruptions, like if two people were talking loudly in the audience?
Oh wait, that would be using existing laws and rules effectively. I forgot; we're supposed to come up with new rules banning every possible unique distraction in every situation. How silly of me to forget.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"Tampering with Jurors"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's been tried.
I'd have liked to see that judge try to put me in jail over someone elses phone ringing. I don't even own a cell phone (yep, I'm a dinosaur in this area.) Said judge would have been teabagged. Or maybe I would just sue the court for wrongful imprisonment....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Branded community
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
camera phones in courtrooms
[ link to this | view in thread ]