Is BitTorrent Realizing That Its Advantage Is In Distribution Technology, Not DRM-Laden Stores?
from the hindsight dept
We were among those who were quite confused last year when BitTorrent (the company, not the underlying technology) decided that its business model would be to give in to counterproductive Hollywood whims and focus on setting up a DRM-protected downloadable movie store. After all, there was plenty of evidence that the market wasn't particularly interested in such things. BitTorrent's advantage had always been in the distribution part of the value chain, and yet here it was basically focusing on things like DRM and e-commerce, where its expertise was minimal, as its business model of choice.Since then, BitTorrent (again, the company, not the technology) has been almost totally lacking from any discussion about downloadable movies.
So, it's hardly a surprise to hear that the company is laying off a bunch of employees, focusing mainly on its sales and marketing staff. This likely means one of two things: that its business is not doing particularly well, and senior management has decided to scapegoat sales and marketing under the false belief that a new team will somehow magically make things work, or that it's realized this was a bomb of a business model and is about to move in a totally different direction, that requires different skills on the sales and marketing side.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: bittorrent, drm, movies, technology
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
It's not entirely their fault - I'm sure they'd go DRM-free if the studios would allow it - but there's no way this could have worked. Apart from the brand name, they have nothing to offer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Except the guy that founded the company also created the technology in the first place.
As far as I can tell, they thought that they could give those companies what they wanted and make money doing so. Its what happens when you only think it part of the way through before deciding on a business plan.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Poor Executive Leadership
Unless they are replacing the executive leadership, then no recognition of bad strategy has been reached. They are simply scapegoating staff (I guess for not succesfully selling something no one wants?). On the good side though in a year or two you can just repost this same thread when it happens again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Passing the buck?
The managers should take responsibility for their actions if you ask me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But if you had read the article you liked you would have known that they wanted to do that without the "DRM-protected" part!.
"This likely means one of two things:..."
Conveniently overlooking the obvious 3rd possibility - techdirt is writing garbage again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
They didn't want to, but their content partners were insisting on it. With that restriction in mind, BitTorrent decided to focus on setting up a DRM-protected store anyway. I don't doubt that they had good intentions, but they decided to go with a business model that was burdened with DRM.
Conveniently overlooking the obvious 3rd possibility - techdirt is writing garbage again.
No, the article is accurate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Perhaps you have spent too much time on planet Maznik.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Knowing that their business model was going to be hampered with DRM, they decided to keep with it anyway. They weren't forced into their business model; limitations were introduced into the model they chose. They decided to focus on their download store, DRM and all.
You seem to be saying that as long as a company has "good intentions", they should be forgiven for making bad business decisions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]