Universities Realize That The RIAA Is Taking Advantage Of Them In Lawsuits On Students
from the pushback-time dept
We never quite understood why various universities were cooperating with RIAA demands that they send "pre-litigation" letters to students accused of file sharing. These non-binding letters are often used to pressure students into paying fines, even if they're based on weak (at best) evidence of file sharing. It certainly wasn't in any university's best interests to basically help out a private organization in a business model dispute with its students. Yet, some university officials, falsely convinced by the RIAA that this was more than a business model dispute, decided to help out. And the response? The RIAA has increased the flood of notices, and then convinced Congress to move forward on legislation that would legally obligate universities to act as the RIAA's copyright cops.It appears that more and more universities are realizing that they got shafted. The EFF points out that there's widespread anger among university officials who felt they were trying to find a middle ground by cooperating, but instead find themselves swamped with more and more notifications and this new legislation that increases their legal liability over a business model dispute. And, the worst part? Now that they're pushing back in court, the RIAA points out that dealing with these notices before wasn't a burden, so universities aren't being truthful that they're now a burden. How's that for a thank you for helping out originally?
If it hasn't become clear by now, the RIAA doesn't view universities as partners in all of this -- and any university that thinks of the RIAA as a partner is about to get steamrolled by the RIAA legal machine. It's time that more universities stood up not just for their own rights, but the rights of their students as well not to be targeted by questionable "pre-litigation" threat letters without more significant evidence. And, it wouldn't help for the RIAA to finally recognize that this entire battle has done nothing to deal with the real issue: its own inability to recognize that its business model needs to change.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, lawsuits, music, riaa, universities
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Shocked!
I'm shocked, I tell you, shocked!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Weak an Lame
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Weak an Lame
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Weak an Lame
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Weak an Lame
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Weak an Lame
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Capitalism at Work
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Capitalism at Work
That reminds me, I have an old game CD that I needed in order to reinstall the game. I guess it got scratched, so it would not reload. The Box had plenty of advertising and the usual warnings to the effect that you have no rights. My point - Nowhere on the box was there any contact information on how to get a replacement CD!!!!
If companies want us to respect their rights, they need to respect our rights too. Obviously they don't so why should we?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Capitalism at Work
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Capitalism at Work
Your post is genius!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Capitalism at Work - Totally agree
Dan
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Capitalism at Work - Totally agree
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
University: "I was drunk and didn't mean it."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Grand Unified Interconnected Litigation Theory
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RIAA = Legalized Racketeering
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RIAA doesn't support Artists.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Red Tape
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How many universities vs. how many record companies?
I'll bet there are a LOT more universities. Of course, not all of them have a lot of money, but if someone could get the universities to band together and each contribute a bit of money to the cause, I'll bet they could smash the RIAA in every case. And remember, many universities contain law schools, so they ought to be able to draw on a lot of legal talent -- I'm thinking alumni who are practicing lawyers, but the law professors may be able to contribute, too.
Is there any legal barrier to the universities banding together for their common defense? Is there any social barrier to it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Black Vans
Of course, the RIAA/MPAA seem to be blind as a bat, shooting at random hoping they'll get someone; sometimes I think they get bored at the office and just start thumbing through the phone book and we all know by now that they don't ACTUALLY pay attention to what goes on in the torrents, they just pick IPs at random...
....so I guess the real concern is: How do I protect my laser printer from disappearing in the middle of the night?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Black Vans
Don't let the printers hear you!
They will make you disappear in the night if they know you know about what they can do.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Even knows . . .
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There's way more music out there...
For instance:
http://www.jamendo.com/
http://www.plainaudio.com/
http://www.monotonik.com/
http:// beta.legaltorrents.com/
http://www.archive.org/details/netlabels
Also, if you're not fond of digging through thousands of songs for the best ones, there are tons of podcasts on iTunes for non-RIAA music. I even make one myself.
The RIAA isn't even worth stealing from.
-
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
12280
:)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RIAA isn't ALL wrong here
Their tactics are a bit extreme, and they would do much better to try and roll with the situation rather than trying to hold back the tidal wave, but laws are laws.
If theft is okay, can I come take your TV? And if you take legal action to get it back, can I make fun of you and accuse you of being unfair?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: RIAA isn't ALL wrong here
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
31872 to be exact! :P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 31872 to be exact! :P
Even if you run the program only while you are downloading, it is sharing during that time, so you are exposed. I haven't any experience with those programs, but I gather from what I've read that there are ways to configure at least some of the programs so that they don't offer your files for sharing, but I think most people don't know to do that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
@adam
Copyright infringement is NOT theft, so your question about the TV is irrelevant. In the cases under discussion, nobody is stealing anything.
As for the law being on the RIAA's side, technically that's correct, but the law is out of date, and people are demonstrating that clearly. When a large enough portion of the population violates a law, that law is, sooner or later, history, either formally via repeal, or informally via lack of enforcement. We haven't reached that point yet, but I'm pretty sure that's what is coming.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]