Universities Realize That The RIAA Is Taking Advantage Of Them In Lawsuits On Students

from the pushback-time dept

Tue, Aug 12th 2008 2:04pm — Mike Masnick

We never quite understood why various universities were cooperating with RIAA demands that they send "pre-litigation" letters to students accused of file sharing. These non-binding letters are often used to pressure students into paying fines, even if they're based on weak (at best) evidence of file sharing. It certainly wasn't in any university's best interests to basically help out a private organization in a business model dispute with its students. Yet, some university officials, falsely convinced by the RIAA that this was more than a business model dispute, decided to help out. And the response? The RIAA has increased the flood of notices, and then convinced Congress to move forward on legislation that would legally obligate universities to act as the RIAA's copyright cops.

It appears that more and more universities are realizing that they got shafted. The EFF points out that there's widespread anger among university officials who felt they were trying to find a middle ground by cooperating, but instead find themselves swamped with more and more notifications and this new legislation that increases their legal liability over a business model dispute. And, the worst part? Now that they're pushing back in court, the RIAA points out that dealing with these notices before wasn't a burden, so universities aren't being truthful that they're now a burden. How's that for a thank you for helping out originally?

If it hasn't become clear by now, the RIAA doesn't view universities as partners in all of this -- and any university that thinks of the RIAA as a partner is about to get steamrolled by the RIAA legal machine. It's time that more universities stood up not just for their own rights, but the rights of their students as well not to be targeted by questionable "pre-litigation" threat letters without more significant evidence. And, it wouldn't help for the RIAA to finally recognize that this entire battle has done nothing to deal with the real issue: its own inability to recognize that its business model needs to change.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: copyright, lawsuits, music, riaa, universities

31 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 12 Aug 2008 @ 2:19pm

RIAA = MOB!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Aug 2008 @ 2:27pm

Shocked!
"Universities Realize That The RIAA Is Taking Advantage Of Them In Lawsuits On Students."

I'm shocked, I tell you, shocked!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
FU_RIAA, 12 Aug 2008 @ 2:47pm

Weak an Lame
The RIAA can't make anybody pay their fines. Those who pay are nothing but sheep, they deserve to be parted from their cash. I'd love for them try to sue me for the 10K+ mp3s i have and continue to amass.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Jim, 12 Aug 2008 @ 3:01pm

Capitalism at Work
The correct response from the universities is a bill to the RIAA for services rendered, prior to providing any information.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Aug 2008 @ 3:02pm

Re: Weak an Lame
aww man! I only have 9k+ mp3s...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
RIAA, 12 Aug 2008 @ 3:02pm

Re: Weak an Lame
We have recorded your IP address. Except to receive a threatening letter from us soon.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Kim, 12 Aug 2008 @ 3:10pm

University: "I was drunk and didn't mean it."
When the RIAA asked "Can I do it in your pooper?" The answer should have been a firm, stern "NO". It's kinda like anal. It's always easier to say NO the first time.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Steve R. (profile), 12 Aug 2008 @ 3:11pm

Grand Unified Interconnected Litigation Theory
Ubersoft has several great cartoon panels that highlight how Corporations are criminalizing any activity that they deem is a frustration of their business models. Clearly we have a growing double standard in how the law is applied.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Steve R. (profile), 12 Aug 2008 @ 3:26pm

Re: Capitalism at Work
Great point. If the RIAA wants a third party to protect them, the RIAA should pay for it. It get's tiresome to hear the RIAA whine about how they need to be protected at our expense.

That reminds me, I have an old game CD that I needed in order to reinstall the game. I guess it got scratched, so it would not reload. The Box had plenty of advertising and the usual warnings to the effect that you have no rights. My point - Nowhere on the box was there any contact information on how to get a replacement CD!!!!

If companies want us to respect their rights, they need to respect our rights too. Obviously they don't so why should we?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anon, 12 Aug 2008 @ 3:38pm

Re: Re: Weak an Lame
16k+
[ link to this | view in thread ]
trav, 12 Aug 2008 @ 3:38pm

RIAA = Legalized Racketeering
There's just no reason to believe that any corporation is about doing good for any person. The RIAA should be indicted under federal charges, and the record companies that support it should be heavily fined- to the extent that they have no capital left to litigate.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Pjerky, 12 Aug 2008 @ 3:58pm

RIAA doesn't support Artists.
A question comes to mind with all of this. Do the artists who's music is "stolen" get any of the money won from litigation. I would be willing to bet that they don't see a dime. That it all goes to the head-freds at the RIAA. If they are going to win any money for this absurd litigation I think the artists should recieve the same cut as they do with normal music that is sold. After all it is their music that was "stolen".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Griper, 12 Aug 2008 @ 4:59pm

Red Tape
I'm surprised a school didn't lose any letter yet. My GI Bill was always being held up because they lost a form or didn't get to the right person.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
dan, 12 Aug 2008 @ 5:43pm

Re: Capitalism at Work - Totally agree
But then, the RIAA hasn't paid it's legal fee's when they have lost in court. So, it would just be another bill they wouldn't pay.

Dan
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Chris, 12 Aug 2008 @ 6:26pm

Re: Re: Capitalism at Work
I Couldn't have stated it better.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Chunky Vomit, 12 Aug 2008 @ 6:50pm

Re: Weak an Lame
I'd love for them to sue you too.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
KD, 12 Aug 2008 @ 7:10pm

How many universities vs. how many record companies?
How many universities are there (just in the U.S.)? How many record companies are participating in these activities?

I'll bet there are a LOT more universities. Of course, not all of them have a lot of money, but if someone could get the universities to band together and each contribute a bit of money to the cause, I'll bet they could smash the RIAA in every case. And remember, many universities contain law schools, so they ought to be able to draw on a lot of legal talent -- I'm thinking alumni who are practicing lawyers, but the law professors may be able to contribute, too.

Is there any legal barrier to the universities banding together for their common defense? Is there any social barrier to it?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Dan, 12 Aug 2008 @ 7:29pm

I guess we could classify them as slow learners, maybe some special ed classes would help.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
T, 13 Aug 2008 @ 1:53am

Black Vans
I wonder how long it will take until the RIAA/MPAA is able to convince Congress that they should be able to make people "disappear", rushing random people into black vans into the middle of the night, no one ever hearing from them again.

Of course, the RIAA/MPAA seem to be blind as a bat, shooting at random hoping they'll get someone; sometimes I think they get bored at the office and just start thumbing through the phone book and we all know by now that they don't ACTUALLY pay attention to what goes on in the torrents, they just pick IPs at random...

....so I guess the real concern is: How do I protect my laser printer from disappearing in the middle of the night?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 Aug 2008 @ 3:46am

Re: Re: Capitalism at Work - Totally agree
That is solved by pay in advance. No pay = no information.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Killer_Tofu (profile), 13 Aug 2008 @ 5:49am

Re: Black Vans
Re #19
Don't let the printers hear you!
They will make you disappear in the night if they know you know about what they can do.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 Aug 2008 @ 7:07am

Re: Re: Re: Capitalism at Work
Chris,
Your post is genius!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 14 Aug 2008 @ 6:18am

Even knows . . .
Picking student pockets is the exclusive domain of Universities and thier close friends in the credit card business. I suspect had the RIAA (like the credit card companies) pledged to send some of that cash collected back to the univerities from whence it came, they would find (like the credit card companies did) a willing partner in University administrations (like the credit card companies have).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 14 Aug 2008 @ 8:05am

In celebration of this article, I will go download some music.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Hamst3r, 14 Aug 2008 @ 10:09am

There's way more music out there...
Than that RIAA crap. RIAA owned stuff isn't even worth listening to with the amount of great quality free music online.

For instance:

http://www.jamendo.com/
http://www.plainaudio.com/
http://www.monotonik.com/
http:// beta.legaltorrents.com/
http://www.archive.org/details/netlabels

Also, if you're not fond of digging through thousands of songs for the best ones, there are tons of podcasts on iTunes for non-RIAA music. I even make one myself.

The RIAA isn't even worth stealing from.

-
[ link to this | view in thread ]
what's an mp3?, 14 Aug 2008 @ 10:31am

12280
to be exact.

:)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Adam, 14 Aug 2008 @ 10:43am

RIAA isn't ALL wrong here
Sorry, but if the RIAA enforces the rights to songs owned by members, those who knowingly violate copyrights by getting music without paying for it deserve punishment - even if they are just "some poor college kid".

Their tactics are a bit extreme, and they would do much better to try and roll with the situation rather than trying to hold back the tidal wave, but laws are laws.

If theft is okay, can I come take your TV? And if you take legal action to get it back, can I make fun of you and accuse you of being unfair?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
landshark, 14 Aug 2008 @ 4:49pm

31872 to be exact! :P
The thing most ppl don't realize, is that you can't get into trouble for downloading music, it's when you share that music with others that you get into trouble for. You can legally download all the music you want, just don't share it with anyone else.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
KD, 16 Aug 2008 @ 6:30am

@adam
Adam,

Copyright infringement is NOT theft, so your question about the TV is irrelevant. In the cases under discussion, nobody is stealing anything.

As for the law being on the RIAA's side, technically that's correct, but the law is out of date, and people are demonstrating that clearly. When a large enough portion of the population violates a law, that law is, sooner or later, history, either formally via repeal, or informally via lack of enforcement. We haven't reached that point yet, but I'm pretty sure that's what is coming.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
AC, 16 Aug 2008 @ 6:36am

Re: 31872 to be exact! :P
True, it is sharing that gets you into trouble, but most of the ways of downloading are peer-to-peer file sharing programs, which normally make available for sharing the files you download.

Even if you run the program only while you are downloading, it is sharing during that time, so you are exposed. I haven't any experience with those programs, but I gather from what I've read that there are ways to configure at least some of the programs so that they don't offer your files for sharing, but I think most people don't know to do that.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 18 Aug 2008 @ 4:48am

Re: RIAA isn't ALL wrong here
That'd be fine, but I'm not allowed to take legal action against someone because my TV is missing and he happens to fit the demographic most likely to have taken it. I need more solid proof than that.
[ link to this | view in thread ]