Once Again: People Just Aren't That Interested In Mobile TV
from the no,-really,-we-swear dept
For years and years we've wondered why various companies were spending billions on building mobile TV systems that simply mimic traditional broadcast TV to mobile phones. In an age of time shifting and place shifting there's little reason for a mobile broadcast TV system that's separate from your other ways of accessing television. People don't want to have to buy into a whole different (expensive) mobile subscription service when they already have a cable subscription at home which they can save via their TiVo. And, if they really want to access it on the go, they can just pick up a Slingbox and not have to pay for an entirely separate subscription. But that hasn't stopped billions from being poured into various mobile TV systems, even though pretty much every test shows very little interest in paying for mobile TV.Of course, sometimes when we talk about this, people tell us that the experiences in Asia -- specifically Korea and Japan -- show that there really is a market for fee-based mobile broadcast TV. Turns out that's not true. A new study in Korea points out that the highly touted mobile broadcast system there gets very, very little usage. In the meantime, Toshiba is backing off plans to offer a fee-based mobile TV subscription service in Japan. So much for those "success" stories.
What's really stunning about this is that it wasn't hard to predict that this would happen years ago, before billions were wasted on such systems. None of this means that video alone isn't an interesting space in the mobile market, but it has to be allowing users to access what video they want -- not taking us back in time to an old live broadcast system, and adding yet another subscription fee for the privilege.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
whats the added bonus?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As if we need another distraction while driving
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: As if we need another distraction while driving
AUGUSTA, Maine — Maine state police say a Kentucky motorist had an excuse when she was stopped because she watching a TV show while driving on I-95.
Spokesman Steve McCausland says the motorist told a trooper that she was tired and was watching the “Gilmore Girls” on her laptop computer to stay awake.
Trooper Tim Marks was stationed at the Gardiner toll plaza making sure drivers were were wearing seat belts when he saw the motorist pass through with her laptop open over the Fourth of July weekend.
The motorist, who was not identified, did not receive a citation for her actions. Maine law prohibits motorists from watching television while driving, but the statute is vague when it comes to other electronic components like a computer.
http://www.funnymos.com/category/dumbass-detected
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just another case of self-deception
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No, I don't want to spend $5.99 a month for streaming tv, plus $8.99 a month for crappy GPS service, plus $9.99 a month for a music service, plus $4.99 a month for traffic updates, plus $40 a month for my cell plan, plus $40 a month for my data plan.
Of course the next battlefront is the capping and usage restrictions on cell data. Eventually the market will figure things out. Of course by then some other better technology will come along and the fight will begin anew.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
other countries don't drive
in the US, everyone drives, and the police will beat you with sticks if you even think about a phone while you are within 50 feet of a car.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The US is not the only market
However, I was on an expert panel on "Killer Apps for the Mobile Phone" at the broadcaster's IBC in Amseterdam in 2005- and I made the point then that A G Bell already had the killer app for the mobile phone. To get leverage on video on the mobile phone you need to build on that personal communicative capacity. Even in multi-screened US there is potential - maybe your kids are not as phone savvy as Europeans?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.berryreview.com/2008/08/14/poll-results-interest-in-mobile-tv-is-not-promis ing/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]