The Mainstream Media Has No Shortage Of Resources
from the doing-less-with-more dept
You regularly see people in the newspaper business, as well as some professional media critics, complaining about the terrible consequences of falling advertising revenues in the mainstream media. There seems to be a worry that as the Internet makes the news business more competitive, traditional media organizations won't be able to afford to do "real" reporting any more. It's not a crazy argument, but more often, the opposite seems to be true. Take the recently-completed Democratic Party convention. Ezra Klein points out that there were a ton of reporters who had to justify their presence at the convention, and so rather than focusing on what was happening on the stage (which they could have just as easily done by watching it on TV) they wandered around looking for trumped-up controversy to cover, giving undue attention (in Ezra's view) to a few disgruntled Clinton supporters. Meanwhile, Matt Yglesias points out that CNN appears to have flown its stars to Denver, put them up in hotels, and constructed an elaborate new set for them, all so they could "cover" the convention in precisely the same way they would have covered it if those same stars had stayed at home in Atlanta or DC. Far from having inadequate resources, on the most high-profile news stories, the mainstream media seems to squander vast sums of money on things that only marginally improve the quality of their coverage. There are a variety of factors that may be undermining the quality of mainstream media coverage, but at the moment, a lack of resources doesn't seem to be among them.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: conventions, coverage, news, reporters, resources
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I Thought You Were Going to Say...
...with which to annoy the public.
It would be funny to watch Old Media execs blather on about what an exciting new "space" the internet is if they weren't, at the same time, desperately trying to neuter it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is whats wrong . .
The mainstream media (using CNN here) is not in the "coverage" business, they are in the business of selling tampons, dish detergent, tort lawyers, etc. They spend money based on what will increase thier advertising revenue dollars and none of the "mainstream" television organizations really seem to view actually improving the quality of the information they provide as important to increasing advertising revenue. Ergo, thats not where they spend thier money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Concentrate on circulation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Concentrate on circulation
I would say the reason is liability. TV channels are required to check if the advertisers comply to a set of regulation and online advertisers are not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Concentrate on circulation
push the costs out to the ad "agencies" which is essentially what google is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
news guys have to fly around the world
maybe i'm alone here, but i just love to watch aging white guys fail to keep the fear out of their voices when they report from war zones and disaster areas. watching them be frightened while sitting 10 miles away from any real activity is just extra win.
doubly so for weather guys. i don't really believe there is a hurricane unless some jackass from a news agency is standing in the driving wind and rain taking his over privileged life in his own hands.
that what hard hitting news is all about: getting paid fat stacks to fly around the world and repeat what the government has told you to say.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They were actually there...
Riots (in the police's own description)
Tear Gas
Mass Protests
Rubber Bullets
Illegal arrest and detention of journalists
Confiscation of journalists cameras and recording devices
Pre-emptive raids on journalists apartments
Where were they looking exactly?
MSM - blinkered, irrelevant bunch of stenographers (but with great hair)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They were actually there...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
One good thing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: One good thing
A spoonful of sugar makes the medicine go down . . .
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Unless people back off of their habits of treating journalists like best friends or movie stars, the only ones left will be Dowd and Brooks making six figures, while they lay off the "real" reporters making one-third of that!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hey wait . . . .
What about Shields . . .
[ link to this | view in chronology ]