Newspapers Beginning To Ditch The Associated Press?
from the no-surprise-there dept
The Associated Press has been having a hard time keeping up with the times. While there was the highly publicized situation where it threatened some bloggers with its own, highly questionable definition of fair use, a much bigger deal is that it's increasingly competing with its own member newspapers by doing things like cutting deals with Google that take traffic away from those member papers' own sites. Apparently, some of those newspapers are paying attention. Romenesko points us to the news that the Star Tribune in Minnesota has alerted the AP that its canceling its membership. It will be worth watching to see if other newspapers start joining in as well. The AP has had many years to learn how to adapt and change in the internet era, and so far it's failed repeatedly. Seeing its member newspapers leaving is just the inevitable result of its botched strategy.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: newspapers
Companies: associated press, star tribune
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Makes Sense
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Many other papers also doing so
"The Minneapolis Star-Tribune is the latest paper to cancel AP service. In Washington, The Spokesman Review of Spokane canceled around the same time that The Bakersfield Californian cut ties. Several smaller newspapers have joined in. In Ohio, eight of the top newspapers, including The Cleveland Plain Dealer, The Columbus Dispatch, The Cincinnati Enquirer and The Toledo Blade, decided to create their own network, the Ohio News Organization. Now they share local news without submitting it to the AP."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
yay!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They have to notify 2 tears in advance ????
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
News Wire
The internet is the news wire.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Noise Wire
bobbknight wrote:
The Internet isn't a news wire, it's a gossip network.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Noise Wire
So you're agreeing that the internet and the AP perform the same function then?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: News Wire
As was posted in a thread here last week, the person that buys a 1/4" drill bit didn't want a 1/4" drill bit...they wanted a 1/4" hole. Home Depot realizes they aren't in the market to sell tools and materials, they market (and aim to sell) completed DIY projects.
The AP needs to think and adjust in a similar fashion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bad content, too
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bad content, too
This is absolutely correct. It makes me want to puke everytime I see one of these farily obvious press-releases regurgitated as news. Good riddence . . . I can read the press release without the middle man.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Related AP story..
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/8/27/164735/096/963/576687
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Neither seems interested in learning any new tricks and yet they expect their obsolete business model to keep functioning. The choice is adapt or die and it appears they've chosen to die.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's also a quality issue
Take the AP's political coverage -- its Washington bureau chief was in talks to take a job with the McCain campaign, and some of his glowing complimentary emails to Karl Rove have been published. Oddly enough, the Washington bureau publishes pieces which are largely opinion, and which support McCain ("Mitt Romney's victory in Michigan was a defeat for authenticity in politics") and attack Obama ("he is bordering on arrogance"). Both of those examples are from putative *news* pieces, not opinion pieces.
Local papers catch heat for that. Readers write to complain that their political coverage is heavily biased. So, yeah, local papers don't like the AP competing with them, but they also don't like the fact that the trust they place in AP to provide top-notch stories that they don't have the resources to do themselves is increasingly misplaced.
The AP is in the process of converting itself to a higher-volume, lower-margin, lower-quality organization. That's the real story here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It's also a quality issue
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
AP's ?quality?
Sound levels range from nearly to totally inaudible.
This is intriguing (like a silent film newsreel) for animal planet -type videos. But it is disrespectful to victims and viewers when AP's disaster news videos are silent (with only very few subtitles) -- and many are.
Earlier, when I complained to COMCAST about FAN's undependable video technical (e.g. frequent very meager sound levels, especially for AP videos) and editorial (e.g. videos truncated in mid-sentence), they informed me that AP feeds frequently mismatched proper interface specifications.
I didn't believe COMCAST. Indeed COMCAST's FAN has an editorial (and technical) responsibility to COMCAST's users. We deserve quality videos.
In cases of technical faults, including faulty feeds, FAN's editorial annotations should notify users of the fault. For sound level faults, FAN should insert subtitles providing best representation of sound track's probable content (bracketed with question marks where uncertain) as can be derived by FAN's editorial staff using COMCAST's highly sophisticated hardware and software tools.
Nonetheless -- indeed irregardless of COMCAST's unsatisfactory editorial responsibility to its users -- sadly, AP's published ethics and standards have diminished in reality to those of a junkyard dog's bullying threats protecting its limited valuables.
[No insult intended to junkyards and the dogs that protect them.]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]