Wikileaks Tries Auctioning Off Leaked Documents

from the interesting-experiment dept

Thu, Aug 28th 2008 9:13am — Mike Masnick

We've been talking about the variety of new and different business models springing up around investigative reporting, and here's another interesting take on the matter. Wikileaks, the site that's become rather infamous for publishing all sorts of leaked documents is experimenting with auctioning off the latest set of documents its received (in this case, emails from the Venezuelan government). Wikileaks will publish the emails itself eventually, but wants to offer a news organization a chance at the exclusive rights to publish the initial stories on the documents, seeing that as a way to raise money to keep Wikileaks going.

As the folks at Wikileaks point out, it's not all that different than various tabloids paying millions of dollars for "exclusive" photos of some celebrity's new baby. However, with newspapers struggling with their own business models, it's unclear who's really going to cough cash up to get exclusive access to these documents. Also, this model runs all sorts of risks: what if the emails don't really reveal that much of interest? Then you're going to have a pissed off buyer. Plus, the whole obsession with "exclusive" news stories is pretty silly. You can't own the news, and while being first on a story may gain some initial traffic, other news sources will pick up the story pretty quickly themselves.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: auctions, breaking news, exclusivity, highest bidder, wikileaks

8 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 28 Aug 2008 @ 9:38am

Are they splitting the profits with the leaker?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Joel Coehoorn, 28 Aug 2008 @ 10:08am

closer to the matter
I wonder if a 3 month reprieve might be worth something to Hugo Chavez himself? Or perhaps his opponents will gain something from making sure the material is more widely available faster?

The information is surely worth something to somebody. It will be interesting to see how much.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Aug 2008 @ 10:21am

Um, I guess you're not aware of this, despite the fact that you write frequently about the media business and profess knowledge of it, but MSM organizations have taken a principled stand of not paying for information, leaked or not. Now you can argue the merits of this -- National Enquirer paid for info on Edwards and they scooped more traditional papers -- but that principled stand has helped maintain the integrity of newspapers and made their reporting generally more reliable than those willing to do shortcuts with shady characters.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mike (profile), 28 Aug 2008 @ 10:24am
  
  Re:
  Um, I guess you're not aware of this, despite the fact that you write frequently about the media business and profess knowledge of it, but MSM organizations have taken a principled stand of not paying for information, leaked or not.
  
  Yes, I know that, but that's why this story is interesting -- to see if anyone bites. I doubt they will, but we'll see. And, no one said that they're just offering this to MSM publications. They're offering it to anyone.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- CastorTroy-Libertarian, Lover, General Annoyance f, 28 Aug 2008 @ 12:41pm
  
  Re:
  "but that principled stand has helped maintain the integrity of newspapers and made their reporting generally more reliable than those willing to do shortcuts with shady characters"
  
  Integrity....absolutely funny, our Media America is so slanted I am beginning to think the Enquirer has more, at least they are honest they do it!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
I like being anonymous!, 28 Aug 2008 @ 10:45am

Like this?
http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Framing_Obama:_what_the_Spectator_and_the_New_York_Sun_won%27t_tell_you
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
crystalattice (profile), 28 Aug 2008 @ 7:43pm

Buyer's remorse
"what if the emails don't really reveal that much of interest?"

Caveat emptor. That's always the case when it comes to "news", or most other things, for that matter.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Aug 2008 @ 2:06pm

Plus, the whole obsession with "exclusive" news stories is pretty silly.
It's the way news organizations count coup amongst themselves, by claiming "first" and "exclusive". Of course the customers, silly things that they are, only care about "timely" and "accurate."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]