You Don't Beat Pirates By Doing Something More Annoying

Internet Poker Lobby Setting Up Tables At Both Conventions

from the upping-the-ante dept

Tue, Sep 2nd 2008 1:42am — Mike Masnick

The US's odd decision to effectively ban online poker as part of a national security law has never made much sense, other than as yet another paternalistic move by the government deciding what is and is not okay for you to do in the privacy of your own home. Some claim that the online poker ban is due to lobbyists from the offline casino industry, who don't like the competition -- but there's little evidence to support that. First of all, the offline casinos have talked about how they'd like to get into the online game themselves, but cannot due to this ban -- and it's quite likely that making games like poker more popular via online competitions would increase foot traffic to offline casinos as people who believe they've become experts online venture out to real world casinos.

Either way, it seems that the folks in favor of legalizing online poker are getting increasingly sophisticated in their lobbying efforts. Last year, they sent representatives to lobby in DC, and this year they're setting up actual poker games at both major party political conventions, trying to drive home the point that playing poker shouldn't be a crime. The article also notes that the lobbyists have started their own Political Action Committee as well, called PokerPAC, which has already raised some cash. Apparently, the poker players are getting serious about calling Congress' bluff on online poker.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: conventions, lobbyists, online poker, pacs, poker

18 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2 Sep 2008 @ 2:05am

USians Don't Want To Lose Face
Legalizing online gambling would mean conceding that Antigua was right. Somehow I can't see that happening any time soon...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- wasnt me!, 2 Sep 2008 @ 3:46am
  
  Re: USians Don't Want To Lose Face
  dude Antigua IS right
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dan Morency, 2 Sep 2008 @ 4:02am

Online poker
Just what we need yet another way for people who can not afford to gamble to flitter away their money. After they are broke the rest of us get to pay higher taxes to support the "poor souls" who just "can't make it no matter how hard they try"

The only real winners are the game operators
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- pawn, 2 Sep 2008 @ 4:58am
  
  Re: Online poker
  @ Dan Morency: That's a dumb reason for a ban. Those people already flitter away their money.
  
  Lots of people enjoy gambling as entertainment. For me, it's like going to see a movie (Except I make money at poker).
  
  And you can find lots of people who spend their money poorly. Lots of people go into credit card debt buying music, movies, video games, consumer electronics, clothes, shoes, etc.
  
  I work with a girl who cannot get out of debt because she buys designer handbags.
  
  Should designer handbags be banned? Of course not. To me, restricting how I spend my money is as offensive as taking it through taxes.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- PaulT (profile), 2 Sep 2008 @ 5:04am
  
  Re: Online poker
  You're a fool if you think people don't already do this illegally.
  
  Besides, online gambling is legal in most other countries and there doesn't seem to be a massive increase in gambling problems. In fact, online casinos in the UK market legally have to promote safe gambling, give players the option to block themselves if they feel they have problems and help problem gamblers (http://www.gambleaware.co.uk/customer-protection/responsible-gambling-measures).
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Eliot, 2 Sep 2008 @ 7:34am
  
  Re: Online poker
  A fool and his money are soon parted.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
ScaredOfTheMan, 2 Sep 2008 @ 4:32am

Re: #3 Online poker
yea, but the same can be said of how people spend what little money they earn on alcohol and tobacco.

I don't play poker online, but its very difficult to find a logical explanation as to why they ban it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thom, 2 Sep 2008 @ 5:00am

I vote
that next time around we set up Russian Roulette tables at the conventions. Then we might make some progress, lol.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Scott, 2 Sep 2008 @ 1:13pm
  
  Re: I vote
  Finally, a comment that makes sense. I'm glad someone else out there sees the similarity between playing internet poker and Russian roulette. Online gambling is way more like a game where the loser dies with a gunshot wound to the head than the in-casino gambling games on which it is based.
  
  We just need to mobilize the gun/Bible toting rural Americans to keep down those snotty jerks with their fancy-pants college educations and indoor plumbing. If those guys take over the country, everything will soon go to Hell. Well, the last 8 years have been great for our cause. Keep the faith, brother!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Paul, 2 Sep 2008 @ 2:55pm
    
    Re: Re: I vote
    I thunk he'un was sayin we otta clean dat dar govment o' ourn up by riddin we sevs o' mosta dem dar ko-rupt politacal type folk. I be'in glad yo straiten me out. Thank much, bro.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
DMo, 2 Sep 2008 @ 8:03am

It's more about funding than playing
With the exception of a very few state laws (I think Indiana is one example), there is no law against *playing* poker online -- nobody has been prosecuted for being "caught" playing online poker. The recent UIGEA legislation only forbids US financial institutions, including credit card companies, from processing transactions used to fund or payout online gambling accounts, which makes it a lot harder to play online for real money. There are plenty of ways around it, however, and there are many poker sites that still support US players. I know, because I have accounts at several. Which just goes to prove that you can pass restrictive legislation all you want, but the people that really want to do (or profit from) something will always find a way to make it happen. Drugs, guns, gambling, et al. So the government would be wise to regulate and tax online gambling rather than attempt to ban it entirely. There may be lots of legitimate reasons, such as public safety, to legislate certain activities, but a perception of "morality" should never be one of them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Will, 2 Sep 2008 @ 9:04am
  
  Re: It's more about funding than playing
  Ok, so you work around this to play. That's great as long as you lose money, or win small amounts, as most the vast majority of people do. Your money finds its way to them with no problem. You're even ok if your one of the few that win large amounts playing with a 100% honest company.
  
  What happens when you win a big pot and the company refuses to pay? No matter what their excuse your only hope at getting your money is to pray you can raise enough of a stink that they fear it'll cost them more. You can't, in any way shape or form, hope to sue them and win because you deliberately circumvented the law to play and they would have to deliberately violate the law to pay.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
John, 3 Sep 2008 @ 5:17am

Probably a Control Issue
It is likely that this is a US government 'people control' issue, the same as the so-called drug war.
As for people flocking to real casinos after playing online, it is unlikely that they would have any money left with which to place a bet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
WK, 3 Sep 2008 @ 2:14pm

Legislating Morality
Regardless of what people say and do, the laws regarding online poker in the US are ridiculous: they are, like Prohibition, a simple attempt to legislate morality. Eventually, these laws will be scrapped after people find out that they don't work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Davis, 5 Sep 2008 @ 2:07pm

Online poker Legislating
hi this is Davis.I love Poker so much and i enjoyed your blog thoroughly.Nice Blog.Enjoyed it.
There are plenty of ways around it, however, and there are many poker sites that still support US players. I know, because I have accounts at several. Which just goes to prove that you can pass restrictive legislation all you want, but the people that really want to do (or profit from) something will always find a way to make it happen
----------------------------------------------
Davis.

http://www.CelebPoker.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 8 Sep 2008 @ 4:44pm

I've been playing poker for over six decades, and I know whereof I speak, there's no such thing as an honest on line poker site.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
rendom, 22 Dec 2008 @ 12:14pm

megaupoad downloading
Tired of finding the file through enormous amount of searchers? 1 center- 1 enter for Megaupload files downloading at http://megaupload.name/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Kelly Brook, 27 Apr 2012 @ 11:58pm

High quality Text Links and Blog post
Hello,

My name is Kelly brook, from a Links & Blogpost Selling Company ( SEOWAYS ). We are leading Blog post and Links provider.

We would like to propose a partnership. I�m sure that you are looking Links & Blogpost for your website to get SERP improvement in Google . If you feel I should contact someone else in your company with regards to Links or Blogpost ( Link Building ) or SEO, please forward this email to the concerned person in your company.

Are you looking blog posts or blogroll links from highly qualified private blog network ranging from PR1 - PR9?

If YES, We are here to support you with affordable prices. We will be satisfying your needs and adjustable with your prices. We are having more than 4500+ PR1 - PR9 blogs with 30+ niche. Network equally distributed over Various C-Class ip's provided by different hosting companies so that locations of c-class also varies. We are having both general blogs and niche oriented blogs. Those blogs are all maintained by 70+ professional SEO associates with less obl.

Our Services: SEO, Link Building, Blogpost, Blogroll Links, Blog Commenting, Live Support etc..

Service Offer:

2$ - Per Blogpost ( You have to provide articles and Three Link Allowed for each post )
2.5$ - Per Blogpost ( We will provide spun articles )

Permanent Sticky blog post : Per Blogpost - $5

Note: You have to provide articles ( We will provide 250 words manually written articles for $2 )

Permanent Blogroll Link price:

PR0 = $1
PR1 = $2
PR2 = $4
PR3 = $8
PR4 = $10
PR5 = $20
PR6 = $30
PR7 = $75
PR8 = $125
PR9 = $250

Report: Report will be delivered 24 to 48 hours

Normal Blogpost Packages:

10 Blog post = $20
25 Blog post = $49
50 Blog Post = $89
100 Blog Post = $175
500 Blog Post = $749
1000 Blog Post = $1250
3000 Blog Post = $3000

Permanent Sticky Blogpost Packages:

10 Blog post = $50
25 Blog post = $120
50 Blog post = $199
100 Blog Post = $399
500 Blog Post = $2199
1000 Blog Post = $2999
3000 Blog Post = $4999

Note: You have to provide articles ( Normal blog post will remain one week on home page )

Features of Getting Blog posts and Links from us:

� No Upfront payment required. We will get payment once order delivered
� We can give guarantee for your site SERP improvement in Google
� Prices are very cheaper & 30+ niche available
� We are ready to sign agreement for long term partnership
� Fast services and support (24/7 Online in Skype or Instant messenger)
� 100% replacement guarantee for missing Posts & Links
� Promotional offers are available for bulk orders
� We are ready for negotiation and adjustments
� All of our blogs have low OBL
� 100% indexing guarantee
� All blogs Who's protected
� Don't wait for us, We can give you login details for my blog network. So you can publish every Blogpost instantly
� We are the owner of network and having full control over the blogs
� Dedicated Analysts available for Link building and SEO Projects

Don't waste time & money with resellers, just give us a try. We will prove ourself with best shot services.

Waiting for your valuable response!

Best Regards,
Kelly brook
Link Building Team
E: kellybrook@cheapbacklinkz.com
Direct Email : simbu@seoways.co.uk
Skype: seoways
W: http://www.seoways.co.uk

This email and any attachments to it are confidential and privileged to SEOWAYS. You must not share the contents with others that are not within your company. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose or act on the email. If it has been wrongly sent to you, please delete immediately and notify the sender. SEOWAYS does not guarantee and is not liable for the security of any information electronically transmitted or for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this communication, or for any delay in its receipt.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]