Texas Instruments Denies Adam Savage's Story About Killing RFID Mythbusters Episode
from the he-said,-she-said dept
In a followup to the story about credit card company lawyers killing an episode of Mythbusters concerning RFID vulnerabilities, Daniel Terdiman got a response from Texas Instruments, who had organized the call that Mythbusters host Adam Savage had described. TI's spokesperson tells a somewhat different story:"In June 2007, MythBusters was interested in pursuing some great myth-busting ideas for RFID. While in pursuit, they contacted Texas Instruments' RFID Systems, who is a pioneer of RFID and contactless technology, for technical help and understanding of RFID in the contactless payments space," TI spokesperson Cindy Huff said. "Some of the information that was needed to pursue the program required further support from the contactless payment companies as they construct their own proprietary systems for security to protect their customers. To move the process along, Texas Instruments coordinated a conversation with Smart Card Alliance (SCA) who invited MasterCard and Visa, on contactless payments to help MythBusters get the right information. Of the handful of people on the call, there were mostly product managers and only one contactless payment company's legal counsel member. Technical questions were asked and answered and we were to wait for MythBusters to let us know when they were planning on showing the segment. A few weeks later, Texas Instruments was told by MythBusters that the storyline had changed and they were pursuing a different angle which did not require our help."This bit of he-said/she-said could actually be true from both ends, with each side having a rather different perception of the call in question. The folks on the call may have been a bit combative over certain issues, and that resulted in Discovery producers getting worried about the episode and "changing the storyline." Either way, if what Huff says is true, is Texas Instruments willing to get the credit card companies to publicly agree that Mythbusters and Discovery should move forward on a story about RFID vulnerabilities? Update: Now Savage is backing down and saying he got the facts of the story wrong...
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: adam savage, mythbusters, rfid
Companies: texas instruments
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
It Should Have Been Taped
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Blah Blah
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Blah Blah
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Already proved
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
From CNET: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13772_3-10031601-52.html
In a statement from Savage--who was speaking for himself at the conference and not appearing on behalf of the show--provided to CNET News by Discovery Channel on Wednesday, the MythBusters co-host retracted the substance of what he'd told the Last HOPE audience.
"There's been a lot of talk about this RFID thing, and I have to admit that I got some of my facts wrong, as I wasn't on that story, and as I said on the video, I wasn't actually in on the call," Savage said in the statement. "Texas Instruments' account of their call with Grant and our producer is factually correct. If I went into the detail of exactly why this story didn't get filmed, it's so bizarre and convoluted that no one would believe me, but suffice to say...the decision not to continue on with the RFID story was made by our production company, Beyond Productions, and had nothing to do with Discovery, or their ad sales department."
I'm sure at some point the reason not to go forward with the story revolved around the likelihood of a lawsuit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Heh... I'd love to be in the room for that call.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
No Adam.. You misread my post.. Go back and re-read it please. :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RFID
Of course we all know that RFID is a fallacy, and the government would never work with corporate shills to track the population. After all, if we can't trust the government, who can we trust.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Busted
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Busted
In other words, Adam when to use his Visa card, it mysteriously wouldn't work. In an increasingly cashless society, you don't want to make enemies of the credit card companies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cover up: +2 Fans: 0
Regardless of who pulled the plug, it's quite obvious there is something unsettling regarding RFID technology.
After reading the GPS story, it's not going to be long before everyone's embedded with an RFID tracking chip.
Might explain the headaches I've been getting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cover up: +2 Fans: 0
Didnt Mitt Romney say he wanted to embed his children with chips? . . . I thought it was a morman thing, like the magic underware? Of course he changes day to day, i dont even think he IS morman anymore (hows that polling?).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cover up: +2 Fans: 0
The trouble is, for us on the outside, there's no way to tell the difference between 1) the candid statement that's now been censored and 2) the idiot who said something wrong and has now corrected it.
So what happens is, for us on the outside, we just let our own biases and prejudices decide if it was (1) or (2).
--
Furry cows moo and decompress.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]