German Court Bans VoIP On The iPhone; Says It's Unfair

from the felony-interference-with-a-business-model dept

Thu, Sep 18th 2008 10:44am — Mike Masnick

We've pointed to a bunch of stories that involved Apple somewhat arbitrarily forbidding or banning iPhone apps, but now it appears that the courts are getting in on the game as well. A German court has banned a VoIP iPhone app after T-Mobile, the mobile operator who offers the iPhone in Germany, complained. The court says that this VoIP app "makes use of unfair business practices," though it's difficult to see how. VoIP is a perfectly acceptable application, so why is it unfair? The court's explanation here seems a bit stretched as well. Apparently, the only way to run this particular VoIP app is on a jailbroken iPhone, and T-Mobile's contract forbids jailbreaking the phone. Of course, if that's true, isn't it an issue between T-Mobile and its customers who broke the contract? Why should the app maker be blamed? All it did was build a useful app? This seems like yet another case where a company is arguing that interference with a business model should be illegal.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: ban, germany, iphone, voip
Companies: apple

27 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Yosi, 18 Sep 2008 @ 11:05am

You don't see anything unfaire?
You don't see anything unfaire? Really? Data connection is more expansive from network resources point of view. So, VoIP over UMTS is clear waste of bandwidth.

If data connection is provided on "unlimited" basis, but voice calls are billed per-minute, be sure that company not intend that you will waste it's network resources for free. Sorry, but voice on mobile phone going through GSM, not Skype. That's what mobile phone exists for.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 18 Sep 2008 @ 11:14am
  
  Re: You don't see anything unfaire?
  Why is this a legal issue?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 18 Sep 2008 @ 12:56pm
    
    Re: Re: You don't see anything unfaire?
    It's not - it happened in Germany so why would US users care? Germany, like much of Europe, still runs a socialist style of government that over-regulates business.
    
    US businesses aren't perfect, but they operate in a better environment than most businesses elsewhere.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- CastorTroy-Libertarian, Lover, General Annoyance f, 18 Sep 2008 @ 11:15am
  
  Re: You don't see anything unfaire?
  Are you Seriously this deranged and mis-guided...
  
  I was going to go into one of my famous and long diatribes but you just are not worth the time or effort if you seriously think the GOVERNMENT should step in on a Contract Dispute between consumer and phone company...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 18 Sep 2008 @ 11:17am
  
  Re: You don't see anything unfaire?
  The contract might well preclude VoIP over UMTS, but that's between the user and T-Mobile - you've failed to explain why the app maker should take the blame.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- AudibleNod, 18 Sep 2008 @ 11:19am
  
  Re: You don't see anything unfaire?
  Unfair doesn't always mean illegal.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 18 Sep 2008 @ 11:20am
  
  Re: You don't see anything unfaire?
  Your misspellings aside, did you really mean expansive or expensive? In either case, could you please define why you believe it is either more expensive or more expansive? I question the facts behind the logic you appear to provide.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- mrops, 18 Sep 2008 @ 1:23pm
  
  Re: You don't see anything unfaire?
  You must be speaking out of your ass, cause your write up sounds and smells like a fart.
  
  Make up your mind, is it a waste of bandwidth or unfair. The issue is not waste of bandwidth, its voice, it directly competes with their offering. Youtube uses 10 times more bandwidth than VoIP does (if not more), yet its ok to watch videos on UMTS.
  
  If I wanted a mobile phone that just did talking i wouldn't have spent the kind of money i do on an iphone. If they don't want VoIP, fine, that is between t-mobile and its customer. Write that in a contract and go after the customer. There are carriers perfectly ok with using VoIP over UMTS, I do so regularly. be bringing down the towers.
  
  It is not t-mobile business interfering with a 3rd party offering. Next Shell will sue Toyota for making the Prius, its robbing us out of revenue, please oh judge, help us.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 18 Sep 2008 @ 2:09pm
    
    Re: Re: You don't see anything unfaire?
    "Next Shell will sue Toyota for making the
    Prius, its robbing us out of revenue, please oh judge, help us."
    
    Read the story of Nicola Tesla at all? Tesla's electric car drove J.P. Morgan, Rockefeller, and Henry Ford crazy!!
    
    http://www.reformation.org/nikola-tesla.html
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 18 Sep 2008 @ 11:14am

VoIP where you are
VOIP is "unfair" to the landline companies who have to maintain all the early 1900s copper that's buried in the ground-- they are unable to collect per-minute revenue for.

In Gaermany, DT's T-Com, is the monopoly wireline provider, and has the unfortunate task of this. The German wireline business has been hemmoraging money for as long as I started watching it (~8 years?). So it comes as no surprise that it seems easier to fight it in court than try to develop a decade-long migration strategy and compelling customer-focused products which can only be brought to market with a full TCP-IP network.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- moe, 18 Sep 2008 @ 11:24am
  
  Re: VoIP where you are
  That may very well be true, but this doesn't have anything to do with landlines. It's about using VOIP apps on the iPhone, a mobile telephone -- even without the VOIP app, the landline company isn't involved.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 18 Sep 2008 @ 11:42am
    
    Re: Re: VoIP where you are
    I think he's saying they are involved behind the scenes, but it would probably never be proven.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 18 Sep 2008 @ 12:39pm
  
  Re: VoIP where you are
  Don't forget that T-Mobile is also the provider offing its own VoIP service called HotSpot@Home in the US allowing unlimted VoIP calling when using T-Mobile HotSpot access points.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
bobbknight, 18 Sep 2008 @ 11:14am

I Don't Like It
I like expansive connections.
I don't like expensive ones.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lame Duck, 18 Sep 2008 @ 11:21am

Is Yosi for real?
If I pay the OUTRAGEOUS amount for the unlimited data plan, who the heck is anyone to tell me what I should or should not use it for?

If I want to download porn 24-hours a day, 7-days a week, that's what I'm paying for.

If I want to surf the web every second of everyday, that's what I'm paying for.

If I want to download or stream music all day long, that's what I'm paying for.

If I want to use VOIP instead of the regular plan, that's what I'm paying for.

I MAY or I MAY NOT use the iPhone for calling. So that's NOT what mobile phones exist for. Maybe... back in the 90's, when cell phones could just do voice and play monotonic ringtones.

Wake up, smell the coffee and join us here in 2008 when we can do all kinds of fun things with our cellphones... only one of which is calling.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 18 Sep 2008 @ 12:58pm
  
  Re: Is Yosi for real?
  If I pay the OUTRAGEOUS amount for the unlimited data plan, who the heck is anyone to tell me what I should or should not use it for?
  Because you agreed to it when you signed up. If you don't like the conditions, don't buy it.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Overcast, 18 Sep 2008 @ 11:22am

be sure that company not intend that you will waste it's network resources for free.

The users are paying for the service. The Company provides 'unlimited' data. The users are using the 'unlimited' data connection, the company is whining.

It seems it's really 'limited' in spite of the fact they say it's 'unlimited' then, correct? To most people 'unlimited' means - without limits, for one to use in a manner that's without some sort of 'limit'. At least - that's the normal definition of the word, it seems they may not agree.

That's false advertising, anyway you spin it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Chronno S. Trigger, 18 Sep 2008 @ 12:03pm
  
  Re:
  It shouldn't matter even if they don't have the unlimited plan. These people are paying for the bits, they should be able to use them in any way they see fit short of illegal activities. And it's not like you can get an iPhone and a data plan without the voice plan. Why are they worried if someone uses VoIP?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - moe, 18 Sep 2008 @ 1:26pm
    
    Re: Re:
    Except that in every mobile phone data plan I've seen, including the unlimited plans and pay-for-bits plans, the terms of service specifically state the allowed uses. Only those uses are allowed (typically web, email, and IM) and any others are forbidden. They even provide some example of forbidden activities, including P2P and streaming media.
    
    So, when you sign up for the service you're signing up for the restrictions, too. You're paying the price set for acceptable use of the connection (as determined by the provider), not for using it any way that you want.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 18 Sep 2008 @ 11:24am

In the US there is a species of tort known as "intentional inteference with prospective economic advantage", one of many torts (civil actions) that are generally proscribed by state unfair competition laws. Perhaps there is a somewhat similar counterpart under German law.

In such instances where this tort applies, the legal action is lodged against the third party associated with such interference, and not the parties to an economic relationship (e.g., contract).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 18 Sep 2008 @ 11:26am

VoIP over WiFi or UMTS?
In linked story at The Register, it mentioned that the app used VoIP over a WiFi connection. Is it possible to have reliable VoIP over UMTS?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Consider The Lobster, 18 Sep 2008 @ 11:46am
  
  Re: VoIP over WiFi or UMTS?
  Yep, VoIP can work over UMTS/WCDMA networks as well as WLAN. But as traffic goes up, there may be trouble with packet loss, latency, and jitter.
  
  Have fun: Nokia Resources
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
You never know, 18 Sep 2008 @ 12:26pm

God forbid VoIP be more efficient!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You never know, 18 Sep 2008 @ 12:26pm

God forbid VoIP be more efficient!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
erica, 18 Sep 2008 @ 7:36pm

Like when AOL's unlimited plan was really limited?
8-12 years ago, when AOL was dialup for most everyone, they offered an unlimited plan. THEN they came back and said 'well, we don't REALLY mean unlimited, so we are going to limit the unlimited.'

So, now if I buy an unlimited data plan and use VOIP, then the provider is going to limit what I USE on that 'un'limited data plan?

Not to mention, I buy the phone, I own the phone, yet the provider is going to tell me what I can and can not to do / install on My Phone after I bought it?

So, does that mean I really do not own my phone I bought - that it is still the providers? Then pay me to act like I am really USING it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Steve, 26 Sep 2008 @ 4:02pm

When the fuck did COMPETITION become unfair?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ryan, 7 Jul 2011 @ 9:44pm

Just let it happen
People are going to find ways to make VoIP work even if there is no app for it. The technology is here just let it happen already.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]