Apple Trying To Patent Not Letting You Use Your Nike+iPod With Non-Nike Shoes
from the this-raises-some-questions dept
I know plenty of folks (including my wife) who have purchased the Nike+iPod device to use with non-Nike sneakers. The device puts a sensor in your shoe, which communicates with a separate dongle connected to your iPod (or built in to the new iPod Touch), and tracks your running stats, which you can then upload. Many Nike sneakers have a little cutout underneath the insoles where you can stick the sensor, but you can buy (or make) a little pouch and connect it to shoelaces on non-Nike shoes. However, not only is Apple thinking about ways to stop this -- it's trying to patent those ways. It's got a patent application in for smart garments which would create basically a DRM for devices -- forceably pairing a device like the Nike+iPod sensor to a specific shoe.This seems odd for a whole variety of reasons. First, it seems positively silly for Apple to do this, as it severely limits the market for the devices, and lessens the value of the iPod. You can see why Nike might ask for it, but it's hard to see why Apple would implement it. Second, however, is that this seems highly questionable as a patent. I mean why would you patent something that makes your product less desirable? Would Apple actually sue someone else (say, Microsoft) for doing the same thing? That would (oh no!) force Microsoft to make its product more useful and more valuable. Finally, as a patent, how is this not "obvious"? It seems like a bad idea to implement, but that doesn't make it non-obvious. If any engineer wanted to create such a system, it wouldn't take much thought at all. The whole thing seems rather pointless.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: drm, ipod, nike+ipod, patents, running, sneakers
Companies: apple, nike
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I might buy the iRak groin protector though.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dumb move
No, I can't actually. Presumably, Nike makes money off every sensor sold. People aren't going to switch shoes to match the sensor. They will happily buy a different fitness product to match their preferred shoes. Making the product less valuable in the market is a dumb move, even for Nike. What they have done now is already the best option: create shoes that are already the "best" for the sensor by having the pocket built-in, but allow anyone to buy it. There are plenty of pedometers out there, and though having it connect to an iPod is convenient, it is not convenient enough to convince someone to wear shoes that don't fit right.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Dumb move
Those folks also tend to be blind supporters of other business restriction mechanisms...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Dumb move
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Dumb move
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Dumb move
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Dumb move...EXACTLY!
Oh how I wished Apple would wake up about this because I know if they would only put their mind to it they could create some INCREDIBLE training equipment that merged with their music products.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Something worth considering.....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Something worth considering.....
Not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
it doesnt matter
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why are you surprised?
They always link their things together, OS and computer, Ipod and Itunes. this is just one more way to do it and getting money from a running shoe manufacturer as a benefit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why?
Just say kNOw
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not odd at all
The funny thing is, Apple will make even more money as the apple faithful will just buy Nikes. Fanboys will buy, and apologists will defend, Jobs will laugh all the way to the bank.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My twelve cents (inflation)
What isn't pointless anymore?
Every day, Corporate America continues to bed each other in hopes consumers are too stupid to catch on what's going on while overcharging them for the simplest of products.
And to think the entire point of advertising is to reduce the cost of the good, not increase it.
I'm expecting legislation to start to begin limiting how companies can advertise.
This is getting beyond frustrating.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nike = Sweatshop
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not so bad
a. Nike+ is definitely not a profit-oriented branch of Nike. It is actually a huge marketing machine for sneakers. Nike definitely does not earn a lot of money by selling the sensor pairs, and has running costs on the web site.
b. Apple does profit from every Nike+ pair sold, since w/o iPod, it simply will not work. Being the tech-savvy partner of the two, Apple is the one who is able to ensure the connection ipod-Nike is solid and does not get sucked up by other shoe manufacturers.
c. Given that Apple has to develop a system to authorize accessories, why shouldn't they at least try to patent it, obviousity aside? Apple has to pay a licence fee for their "visual voicemail" feature, so it would be bordering on misconduct not to patent every single idea that is deemed interesting by more than 2 Apple Engineers. Not only can they pull in licensing fees from every company that tries the same, it can also add a patent imfringement lawsuit to everyone who tries to circumvent the mechanism it implements.
That said, from a consumer standpoint, this is totally useless. If I'd be a runner, I'd rather pay 20 bucks/y. for something like World of Joggercraft, where I can upload my running data from any shoe I like. But I don't see anyone offering the ease-of-use, reliability and market strength on the horizon. In fact, I don't see any competition at all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not so bad..........PLEASE! *rollseyes*
Lemme see Steveo try to market that crap to Michellie Jones or Ryan Hall. Oh, it would be wonderful if I didn't have to use a seperate mp3 player with a heart rate monitor/pace tracking plus watch set of devices. A totally unified system that played music, tracked my heart rate and pace plus had an intelligently designed software package that simplifies the data analysis process and gives you the bottomline how your training is progressing would be ideal. And with Apple's software know how that would be simple for them to do.
But unfortunately, Steve does not seem to be able to make that mental connection.
Again, when Steve wakes up about it and decides to get serious....call me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Indian Giver's
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
they just don't know how to do something else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I run alot
That said, I have one of those lace pouches. I've already gone through three pairs of running shoes since I got it. Each time I got new shoes, I actually looked for a nike+ shoe. All the ones I could find, were absurdly overpriced. I always wound up buying nike shoes, they fit me well, and I can find them cheap.
So Nike is getting my money. Apple is getting my money. So.. exactly what is this patent supposed to do for either of them? Convince a competitor to create a similar product that's not stupidly encumbered? Alright! bring on more competition.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
itunes
Making this product only work with Nike shoes is the equivalent of making your Nike shoes fail if your not wearing a Nike shirt,head band and shorts. (oops maybe I gave them an idea).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's all moot
Even the shoe salesman said that Nike is, er--let's say, not the leader in making running shoes.
If they were to market a GPS Nike/iPod device, then I would definitely buy one. Of course, I would probably adapt it to fit in my New Balances, but that's just me...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh no Apple won't!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You better tell me first
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Other uses
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anticompetitive by definition
[ link to this | view in chronology ]