Turkey Bans Richard Dawkins' Website, Because It Offends A Creationist
from the why-not-just-ban-the-internet? dept
We already know that Turkish officials have a pretty quick trigger finger when it comes to banning certain websites. They've banned YouTube multiple times due to videos they found offensive, and then banned Slide, a multimedia hosting company as well. Still, it's a bit surprising to discover that now they've banned the website of Richard Dawkins after a Turkish creationist complained that the site had insulted him. Apparently, this guy, Adnan Oktar, has become quite successful at getting sites blocked in Turkey. In the past, he also got Wordpress.com and Google Groups blocked after he became upset at content found on both of those sites. And, even better, he claims he's not against free speech, he's just against insults. And, apparently, anyone who disagrees with him is insulting.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: adnan oktar, creationism, darwinism, richard dawkins, turkey
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
wonder
[ link to this | view in thread ]
How bout this fucking buy STOPS SEEKING OUT SITES THAT HAVE INFORMATION THAT "OFFENDS" HIM.
IT'S PERSONAL FUCKING RESPONSIBILITY, IF YOU DON'T LIKE SOMETHING, IGNORE IT, DON'T READ, WATCH, or LISTEN to IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
STOP RUINING IT FOR EVERYONE ELSE.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Huh?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
About the block it is stupid but hey, atleast over there ISP are listening to what people has to say...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
oops....I guess I just got Techdirt blocked in Turkey.
Oh well, who the hell cares?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Not about Creationism
[ link to this | view in thread ]
and the cheap shot award is sent out
Well, I mean, Damn. It's Richard Fucking Dawkins. This is just good policy, isn't it?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Not about Creationism
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Islam
I'm all for tolerance, but a superstition that preaches "submit, pay a special tax, or die" is not something I'm willing to tolerate. It does not merit tolerating, and its followers have no legitimate place in a world of decent people.
--
www.chl-tx.com
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Not about Creationism
--
www.chl-tx.com
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Nothing will happen to you if you don't insult people because of what they believe...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Forget the difference in subject matter, clearly the EU isn't all that big on freedom of speech.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Not about Creationism
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Not about Creationism
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Not about Creationism
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Who is this guy
So any time he thinks a site is offensive, the government will block it?? Not even President Bush or Bill Gates has that kind of power.
And I worry about a country where ONE person complains about a site and government will block it. Or is there more to this story? Did the guy take the case before a review board? Was there any kind of "court hearing" about the offensiveness of the site?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Islam
I'm all for tolerance, but a superstition that preaches "submit, pay a special tax, or die" is not something I'm willing to tolerate. It does not merit tolerating, and its followers have no legitimate place in a world of decent people."
Dude I know, why cant they be Christians like decent people. Anyway nice to see another quality American on these forums finally.
Vote McCain 2008 - For change without a difference.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
What happens if you do insult people for what they believe? Free speech is not a highly valued doctrine I assume?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Well there goes most of the best video game sites . . . thanks!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
its the opiate of asses
[ link to this | view in thread ]
YouTube in England banned educational cancer screening video cause it showed nekkid stuff.
Thailand blocked access to YouTube after a video critical to its king was posted (and commonly bans similar websites... as well as recently imprisoned a man for 10 years for writing graffiti on a poster of the king)
England has banned all YouTube videos glamorizing weapons and/or their use.
Over 853 major websites are banned in Turkey (including the aforementioned Dawkins "we evolved from the DNA of advanced aliens" website).
China blocks thousands of websites, including such radical locations as harvard.edu, mit.edu, and google.com.
and on and on and on...
Count your blessings while you still can in this country. Fight tooth and nail to not give up the rights endowed by your Creator that government meddlers, politically correct feel-gooders, and lazy thinkers seem determined to take away from you, bit by bit.
God bless America :)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: wonder
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Not about Creationism
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Islam
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Godwin's Law
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: its the opiate of asses
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
You are kidding, right?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: its the opiate of asses
NoBamma 2008
[ link to this | view in thread ]
And women are treated like pets also...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I suspect this creationist is unable to defend his creationist beliefs and that is why he fears sites such as Dawkins or he simply has a dictators mindset.
I am able and willing to defend my beliefs I see websites/information defending evolution as an opportunity to learn what and why the 'other side' believes.
I believe this person would be better served if he too looked at it in that way.
While I believe my worldview (Christianity) is the correct/true worldview I do not believe it my place to force others to reject differing worldviews.
I often make attempts to convince others to reject their worldview and adopt a Christian worldview, but I see no sense in trying to force someone in such a direction.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Still, just 'cause evolution happened doesn't mean god doesn't exist.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Not about Creationism
Now you will definitely reply back, that Christianity (or whatever is your religion) is better. I'd answer, bingo! I am right in the above statement :)
Just be rational. Before criticizing others, look at yourself and your "faith". Having a faith is bad, no matter which one.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
AC
hahahaha. heh, whew, thanks, good one, havent had that good a laugh in quite a while on this subject.
Evolution is a theory. Theories by their very nature are yet to be proven. Things not proven (or not provable) are not facts. Accepting such things is FAITH. Sorry, but thats just how it is.
There is NO CONCRETE PROOF of life as we know it deriving from some primordial soup (or whatever mechanism evolution believes in this week). Zero. Zip. Nada. FAIL.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: AC
Here is some light reading you may find interesting.
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/39512
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Wait....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: wonder
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It's not about religion... It is law abuse.
I think the whole mess about banning sites is a good example of legal abuse. The law which allows (even local) courts to ban websites was actually intended for matters like terrorism and child porn. At that stage a lot of people including me and most of the civil rights groups in Turkey were not happy with the law. People complaining about it were marked as terror preachers and child-porn-downloaders by the populist media. For a while courts with overprotective (or conservative) judges used it to ban porn sites (even some manga sites were blacklisted under the child-abuse assumption).
Then came the abuse of law by the media by pointing to sites which they don't like. Very popular newspapers like Hurriyet started pointing a site (like youtube) by actually talking about one file or link or some media and than targeting the whole site. The rest of the media, liberals and conservatives all alike followed the example. Politicians did not miss the move, so they also started complaning about bad content in the tubes. In Turkey it is not very hard to find a judge which has the free time for listening complaints and not the guts to dismiss a case coming from popular media or politicians. And there is still the authority of judges to self-initiate cases if seen fit as in "good for people".
As this whole abuse of law was not enough, we have people like Adnan Oktar. He is the turkish version of the Church of Scientology, but think of him as Xenu himself leading the church. He and his followers are using any possible means of law to make life miserable for other people. On a given day you can find a few thousand court invitations in your mailbox for just blogging about him. His cult was famous with their polygamic lifestyle and orgies they were organizing at 90's. On the gossip pages one can always find something to read about him and his concubines from fashion industry. One sure thing is that they have nothing to do with any kind of semitic religion.
So here my two cents, now i have to go check my mailbox. ;)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Website banned but book on sale
Additionally, while Turkey has a strictly secular constitution, the current government (democratically elected by a landslide) has strong Islamic roots and this inevitably emerges in some of it's policies. There is already plenty of public and media attention on the anti-secular policies of the government. It's just a matter of time before they are forced to backtrack on these.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Dawkins
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Richard Dawkin's
[ link to this | view in thread ]