Will The DOJ's Interpretation Of Email Privacy Make It Difficult To Prosecute Palin Email Hacker?

Turkey Bans Richard Dawkins' Website, Because It Offends A Creationist

from the why-not-just-ban-the-internet? dept

Fri, Sep 19th 2008 9:35am — Mike Masnick

We already know that Turkish officials have a pretty quick trigger finger when it comes to banning certain websites. They've banned YouTube multiple times due to videos they found offensive, and then banned Slide, a multimedia hosting company as well. Still, it's a bit surprising to discover that now they've banned the website of Richard Dawkins after a Turkish creationist complained that the site had insulted him. Apparently, this guy, Adnan Oktar, has become quite successful at getting sites blocked in Turkey. In the past, he also got Wordpress.com and Google Groups blocked after he became upset at content found on both of those sites. And, even better, he claims he's not against free speech, he's just against insults. And, apparently, anyone who disagrees with him is insulting.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: adnan oktar, creationism, darwinism, richard dawkins, turkey

53 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

mike allen, 19 Sep 2008 @ 9:39am

wonder
Can you now get techdirt in Turkey He is in the right country Turkey for Turkeys.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- WarOtter (profile), 19 Sep 2008 @ 1:00pm
  
  Re: wonder
  Dude, make like my wife and get a period or two.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- DS, 20 Sep 2008 @ 9:18pm
  
  Re: wonder
  Well, you can't get techdirt in Turkey anymore. At least once this dolt sees this page.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Sep 2008 @ 9:53am

i will never understand this pacification bullshit. Just because one person has a "belief" doesn't mean that everyone else that is interested in a subject has to suffer.

How bout this fucking buy STOPS SEEKING OUT SITES THAT HAVE INFORMATION THAT "OFFENDS" HIM.

IT'S PERSONAL FUCKING RESPONSIBILITY, IF YOU DON'T LIKE SOMETHING, IGNORE IT, DON'T READ, WATCH, or LISTEN to IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

STOP RUINING IT FOR EVERYONE ELSE.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- rfburnhertz, 19 Sep 2008 @ 3:01pm
  
  Re:
  I happen to be a creationist and find this persons crying over Dawkins website to be beyond stupid and silly.
  
  I suspect this creationist is unable to defend his creationist beliefs and that is why he fears sites such as Dawkins or he simply has a dictators mindset.
  
  I am able and willing to defend my beliefs I see websites/information defending evolution as an opportunity to learn what and why the 'other side' believes.
  
  I believe this person would be better served if he too looked at it in that way.
  
  While I believe my worldview (Christianity) is the correct/true worldview I do not believe it my place to force others to reject differing worldviews.
  
  I often make attempts to convince others to reject their worldview and adopt a Christian worldview, but I see no sense in trying to force someone in such a direction.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 19 Sep 2008 @ 6:46pm
    
    Re: Re:
    A good debate can often be fun... But evolution is a fact not a belief. It's as much a theory as gravity is.
    
    Still, just 'cause evolution happened doesn't mean god doesn't exist.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Dawger, 20 Sep 2008 @ 11:38pm
    
    Re: Re:
    Well you are an idiot, but a nice idiot.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Dawger, 20 Sep 2008 @ 11:42pm
    
    Re: Re:
    Well you are an idiot, but a nice idiot.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
deathbychichi, 19 Sep 2008 @ 10:04am

Wondering how all this banning of stuff will affect Turkey's attempt to join the EU.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Jillian, 19 Sep 2008 @ 11:24am
  
  Won't make a big difference - the rest of the EU filters the Internet too - how about Germany's ban on Holocaust denial sites?
  
  Forget the difference in subject matter, clearly the EU isn't all that big on freedom of speech.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tweenybobber, 19 Sep 2008 @ 10:29am

Huh?
Why does Turkey hate the guy from Family Fued?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
eXistenZ, 19 Sep 2008 @ 10:32am

You think EU countries will let turkey get in? Come on you are talking about a nation who is %99 muslim they will never let us in. Even after giving up north Cyprus.
About the block it is stupid but hey, atleast over there ISP are listening to what people has to say...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Sep 2008 @ 10:34am

One person doesn't equal the opinion of everyone. it's complete and utter bullshit that any ISP would do this for any one person.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Sep 2008 @ 10:46am

Adnan Oktar is a moron!

oops....I guess I just got Techdirt blocked in Turkey.

Oh well, who the hell cares?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Sep 2008 @ 10:51am

Not about Creationism
Get it straight! This is about offending Muslims, not creationists in general. You go against Islam in Turkey, you're done. When you talk about Islamic countries, you're not just talking about the popular religon there, you're talking about the government. Islamic law is just that... the law!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Bear, 19 Sep 2008 @ 10:59am
  
  Re: Not about Creationism
  I could be wrong but I think I remember reading that Turkey was the only country in that region that has a deliberately secular gov't. Can anyone else confirm?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - TX CHL Instructor (profile), 19 Sep 2008 @ 11:03am
    
    Re: Re: Not about Creationism
    So far, the government there is nominally secular. However, since the muslim superstition claims over half of the population of Turkey, that won't last much longer.
    --
    www.chl-tx.com
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Jillian, 19 Sep 2008 @ 11:26am
    
    Re: Re: Not about Creationism
    No, wrong. Syria's government is notably secular as well. A dictatorship, but a secular one.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Jillian, 19 Sep 2008 @ 11:26am
    
    Re: Re: Not about Creationism
    No, wrong. Syria's government is notably secular as well. A dictatorship, but a secular one.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Jillian, 19 Sep 2008 @ 11:26am
  
  Re: Not about Creationism
  Um, Turkey is a secular country. What you just said could very well apply to the U.S. as well. We've got politicians trying to integrate law and religion as well, we just veil it under the more precarious abortion debate.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - mobiGeek, 19 Sep 2008 @ 1:05pm
    
    Re: Re: Not about Creationism
    And the marriage debate. And the "science education" debate. And the "freedom of prayer in public schools" debate. And...
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- AJ, 19 Sep 2008 @ 7:41pm
  
  Re: Not about Creationism
  Every "believer" is a creationist or supporter of one. By believe I mean person following a religion. Christians are no better dude. Islam is not any worse than any other religion on the planet. To every person, his or her religion seem better.
  
  Now you will definitely reply back, that Christianity (or whatever is your religion) is better. I'd answer, bingo! I am right in the above statement :)
  
  Just be rational. Before criticizing others, look at yourself and your "faith". Having a faith is bad, no matter which one.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dosquatch, 19 Sep 2008 @ 10:58am

and the cheap shot award is sent out
Well, I mean, Damn. It's Richard Fucking Dawkins. This is just good policy, isn't it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
TX CHL Instructor (profile), 19 Sep 2008 @ 10:59am

Islam
Islam, the bronze-age superstition started by a pedophile, is currently the most dangerous superstition on the planet.

I'm all for tolerance, but a superstition that preaches "submit, pay a special tax, or die" is not something I'm willing to tolerate. It does not merit tolerating, and its followers have no legitimate place in a world of decent people.
--
www.chl-tx.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 19 Sep 2008 @ 12:19pm
  
  Re: Islam
  "Islam, the bronze-age superstition started by a pedophile, is currently the most dangerous superstition on the planet.
  
  I'm all for tolerance, but a superstition that preaches "submit, pay a special tax, or die" is not something I'm willing to tolerate. It does not merit tolerating, and its followers have no legitimate place in a world of decent people."
  
  Dude I know, why cant they be Christians like decent people. Anyway nice to see another quality American on these forums finally.
  
  Vote McCain 2008 - For change without a difference.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- mobiGeek, 19 Sep 2008 @ 1:08pm
  
  Re: Islam
  You know, Bill O'Reilly is not a scholar on religious studies. Quit taking his word on what Islam means. Quit taking the CNN footage of three scarved freaks as representative footage of the billion normal people who subscribe to the philosophies prescribed by the religion.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
eXistenZ, 19 Sep 2008 @ 11:03am

You idiot Turkey is a Republic not ruled by islam. And there are thousands of Jewish and Christian people live in Turkey.
Nothing will happen to you if you don't insult people because of what they believe...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Saturn, 19 Sep 2008 @ 11:22am
  
  Re:
  But that's the rub, eXistenZ - it doesn't matter what someone says, it only matters how someone else takes it (and possibly twists it out of context).
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 19 Sep 2008 @ 12:20pm
  
  Re:
  "Nothing will happen to you if you don't insult people because of what they believe..."
  
  What happens if you do insult people for what they believe? Free speech is not a highly valued doctrine I assume?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
another mike, 19 Sep 2008 @ 11:39am

godwin in 15. nice.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- DarkDancer, 19 Sep 2008 @ 1:12pm
  
  Re: Godwin's Law
  I don't think I would call Godwin's on that as no one was being compared to Hitler or the Nazi's.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
interval, 19 Sep 2008 @ 11:46am

I'm still waiting for some one to be insulted by an islamic website and try to get it banned. Why doesn't that happen? I'm not talking about blocking a site that displays the Koran. But I'm insulted by violence. How about blocking a site that advocates murder by suicide car bombing?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 19 Sep 2008 @ 12:21pm
  
  Re:
  "How about blocking a site that advocates murder by suicide car bombing?"
  
  Well there goes most of the best video game sites . . . thanks!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- mobiGeek, 19 Sep 2008 @ 1:10pm
  
  Re:
  Who is it you want blocking these sites? The governments of the Western world who mostly subscribe to the rights of free speech???
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
John (profile), 19 Sep 2008 @ 12:03pm

Who is this guy
Who is this guy in Turkey and how did he get so much power? I'll admit that I'm not up on Turkish politics, but is this guy the President/ Premier/ Prime Minister/ Lord Over the Country?

So any time he thinks a site is offensive, the government will block it?? Not even President Bush or Bill Gates has that kind of power.

And I worry about a country where ONE person complains about a site and government will block it. Or is there more to this story? Did the guy take the case before a review board? Was there any kind of "court hearing" about the offensiveness of the site?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Adnan Oktar, 19 Sep 2008 @ 12:37pm

Adnan Oktar sounds like a wonderful person
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
J.Locke, 19 Sep 2008 @ 12:55pm

its the opiate of asses
If you believe something is a moral affront to the very word of GOD, don’t you have a responsibility to stop it? This is of course one of the many things wrong with organized religion (and one of the many things that make Iran and Israel very similar). I can’t wait until the world is free of the old prejudices, hatreds and superstitions called religion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- mobiGeek, 19 Sep 2008 @ 1:18pm
  
  Re: its the opiate of asses
  Not when your religion prescribes that every practitioner should question everything and seek their own answers. If they do not accept criticisms, then they are not true followers.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- bobety Boberanna, 19 Sep 2008 @ 1:29pm
  
  Re: its the opiate of asses
  You seem full of hate Brohm and prejudice yourself. The world may be a better place without people like you too.
  
  NoBamma 2008
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ferd, 19 Sep 2008 @ 12:57pm

Network Solutions banned a Dutch web site that contained little more than the words "Fitna" (which is an Arabic word meaning a test of faith) along with a picture of the Qur'an and "Coming Soon." which was being used to promote a Dutch movie critical of the Qur'an... from pressure from Dutch govt.

YouTube in England banned educational cancer screening video cause it showed nekkid stuff.

Thailand blocked access to YouTube after a video critical to its king was posted (and commonly bans similar websites... as well as recently imprisoned a man for 10 years for writing graffiti on a poster of the king)

England has banned all YouTube videos glamorizing weapons and/or their use.

Over 853 major websites are banned in Turkey (including the aforementioned Dawkins "we evolved from the DNA of advanced aliens" website).

China blocks thousands of websites, including such radical locations as harvard.edu, mit.edu, and google.com.

and on and on and on...

Count your blessings while you still can in this country. Fight tooth and nail to not give up the rights endowed by your Creator that government meddlers, politically correct feel-gooders, and lazy thinkers seem determined to take away from you, bit by bit.

God bless America :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- mobiGeek, 19 Sep 2008 @ 1:22pm
  
  Re:
  God bless America
  You are kidding, right?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
eu, 19 Sep 2008 @ 1:46pm

What do we expect from a country that every party in the Parliament are more or less a nationalist one.
And women are treated like pets also...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RD, 20 Sep 2008 @ 6:16am

AC
Quote: "A good debate can often be fun... But evolution is a fact not a belief. It's as much a theory as gravity is."

hahahaha. heh, whew, thanks, good one, havent had that good a laugh in quite a while on this subject.

Evolution is a theory. Theories by their very nature are yet to be proven. Things not proven (or not provable) are not facts. Accepting such things is FAITH. Sorry, but thats just how it is.

There is NO CONCRETE PROOF of life as we know it deriving from some primordial soup (or whatever mechanism evolution believes in this week). Zero. Zip. Nada. FAIL.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Oh My Goodness, 20 Sep 2008 @ 8:23am
  
  Re: AC
  Granted, and some theories might never be "proven" although they are accepted as being the prevailing most accurate model.
  
  Here is some light reading you may find interesting.
  http://www.theonion.com/content/node/39512
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 20 Sep 2008 @ 9:06am

religion is for people who don't think.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jeff, 20 Sep 2008 @ 7:37pm

Wait....
Hold on a second...who gives a fuck what Turkey does?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Another Planet, 21 Sep 2008 @ 3:21am

"Religion" is what happens when Spirituality fails.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
spanners the wonder panda, 21 Sep 2008 @ 2:46pm

"Religion" and "Spirituality" are what happen when weak minds are infected by similarly weak minds ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yagmur, 21 Sep 2008 @ 6:17pm

It's not about religion... It is law abuse.
I'm from Turkey and living in Germany.

I think the whole mess about banning sites is a good example of legal abuse. The law which allows (even local) courts to ban websites was actually intended for matters like terrorism and child porn. At that stage a lot of people including me and most of the civil rights groups in Turkey were not happy with the law. People complaining about it were marked as terror preachers and child-porn-downloaders by the populist media. For a while courts with overprotective (or conservative) judges used it to ban porn sites (even some manga sites were blacklisted under the child-abuse assumption).

Then came the abuse of law by the media by pointing to sites which they don't like. Very popular newspapers like Hurriyet started pointing a site (like youtube) by actually talking about one file or link or some media and than targeting the whole site. The rest of the media, liberals and conservatives all alike followed the example. Politicians did not miss the move, so they also started complaning about bad content in the tubes. In Turkey it is not very hard to find a judge which has the free time for listening complaints and not the guts to dismiss a case coming from popular media or politicians. And there is still the authority of judges to self-initiate cases if seen fit as in "good for people".

As this whole abuse of law was not enough, we have people like Adnan Oktar. He is the turkish version of the Church of Scientology, but think of him as Xenu himself leading the church. He and his followers are using any possible means of law to make life miserable for other people. On a given day you can find a few thousand court invitations in your mailbox for just blogging about him. His cult was famous with their polygamic lifestyle and orgies they were organizing at 90's. On the gossip pages one can always find something to read about him and his concubines from fashion industry. One sure thing is that they have nothing to do with any kind of semitic religion.

So here my two cents, now i have to go check my mailbox. ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jake, 22 Sep 2008 @ 6:50am

In the Turkish creationist's defence, Richard Dawkins has displayed an unfortunate tendency towards... tactlessness, shall we say?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous, 23 Sep 2008 @ 6:52am

Website banned but book on sale
They might have banned the website, but you can still buy the book (in English and Turkish) in major bookstores all over Turkey. See: http://www.dr.com.tr/FO/ProductDetailForBook.aspx?work_no=0000000227732

Additionally, while Turkey has a strictly secular constitution, the current government (democratically elected by a landslide) has strong Islamic roots and this inevitably emerges in some of it's policies. There is already plenty of public and media attention on the anti-secular policies of the government. It's just a matter of time before they are forced to backtrack on these.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Victor, 7 Nov 2008 @ 10:01pm

Dawkins
Maybe its wrong for Turkey to ban his website, but this guy he boldly goes to debate the most ignorant fundamentalist preachers in the Bible belt he can find and makes a video program about it, but gives the lamest excuses to avoid debates with Christian Philosophers or Apologists such as JP Moreland, Willam L Craig, or Dinesh D'souza. The fact of the matter is, is this individual is not interested in people to think for themselves. He makes some legitime issues and makes some points, but his temper and lack of objectivity concerning philosophical and theological issues, and in the end, his critique of religion in general is a straw man argument based on a distorted view of science, a series of straw man arguments against Christianity and other religions, and pseudo explanations based on a very speculative psychological theory (his meme-ology). I don't like censorship, but censoring Dawkins isn't exactly the most outrageous thing one can censor.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Carole Heath Wallington Surrey, 20 Feb 2009 @ 8:50am

Richard Dawkin's
Hasn't Richard Dawkins a right to his opinions can't a free thinker voice his views, I am a member of the British humanist society and also a non-religious person like Richard I agree with much of what he says. What would Turkey like to do ban all free thinkers, people who do not agree with religion have aways been on earth since humankind first started it, I think these people who object to us non-religious are small minded and can't except other's views, ie evolution and Darwinism, I don't object to their beliefs. I think Richard has many people who agree with him ride on Richard that's what I say.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]