Google Tries To Patent Least Cost Routing?
from the er...-that's-old dept
First off, we should point out that there's a tendency in the press to discover a patent app (or even a granted patent) from a company and immediately write up an article claiming that the company is planning to implement what's in said patent -- as if the patent gives a glimpse into that company's future plans. The truth is that plenty of companies patent stuff that never amount to anything. So, reading the tea leaves via patent application is unlikely to be very accurate. So, it's difficult to put much weight into the claims from Wired that Google is planning to "kill off cellphone contracts" based on a recently revealed patent application on a flexible communications system, that would effectively bid out to various telco providers for the best possible rate before initiating a connection.The real question shouldn't be about whether or not this will kill off mobile contracts, but why anyone should think this is patentable material. Least cost routing techniques have been around for ages, and you could buy a fax machine that would do it automatically for you years ago (I think I bought mine at least five years ago). It's hard to see what's all that different here, other than that it would be for data instead of voice or fax (which are really data in their own way) and that it could include mobile lines or alternative broadband options like WiFi. But that hardly seems worthy of a patent. Even odder? Google was sued about three years ago for apparently infringing on a least cost routing patent held by RTI, a patent holding company that recently had its tactics exposed.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: least cost routing, patents
Companies: google, rti
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
The point I am making is simply that I would not casually dismiss his work and that of his co-inventors/colleagues simply because LCR techniques have previously been developed. What matters here is to identify the technique he and his colleagues have created, and to then compare that technique to prior art techniques to determine if it is new, useful and nonobvious.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I wouldn't take what Mike has said as a personal criticism of either the good Doctor or similarly qualified persons. Take rather as a frustrated howl that the system encourages obvious applications for reasons that have little to do with innovation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
again - it's not what they are doing but how.
Just because you can travel from here to there already by bicycle doesn't mean that traveling the same route by car isn't a different thing altogether.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Example of how IP Owner gets screwed
here is an article where a man makes a HUGE contribution to the medical profession, and through the same types of theft y'all seem to promote the man gets screwed into poverty.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Example of how IP Owner gets screwed
Theft? Please explain what was "stolen"? All I see in the article is competition that drove the medical industry forward, and one guy who was unable to compete.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anti-lawsuit patent
Still, it is disheartening to see so many patents in the hands of one company, where a change in ownership or corporate philosophy could really harm tech innovation. And, certainly, this should not be patentable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How is that odd?
Why do you think it's odd that Google would try to protect itself from similar law suits in the future by obtaining a patent for its method of least cost routing?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
patent the solution, not the problem
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just One MVNO Could Make Wireless a Utility
[ link to this | view in chronology ]