Focus On Attention First, And The Money Will Follow

from the indeed dept

Wed, Oct 1st 2008 4:58pm — Mike Masnick

Kevin Kelly's latest post tackles a pretty common subject around here, about how the most important thing in a business model is getting attention, and from there, the money will follow. It's a response to those who insist that everything needs to be paid for up front. The problem is that that doesn't work when no one understands why they should give you any money. In some ways, it's just another way of saying the phrase that obscurity is a much bigger threat than piracy. As with most of Kelly's writings, it's a worthwhile read. I'm hopeful that he'll take this further and start to note how attention is very much a part of the economic equation as well, because attention is a very important scarce good.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: attention, business models, kevin kelly

4 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Eric Goldman (profile), 1 Oct 2008 @ 5:19pm

True, but...
The importance of attention is unquestionable, but wasn't this clearly articulated almost 10 years ago in Goldhaber's article *in Wired*? Eric.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mike (profile), 1 Oct 2008 @ 10:48pm
  
  Re: True, but...
  The importance of attention is unquestionable, but wasn't this clearly articulated almost 10 years ago in Goldhaber's article *in Wired*? Eric.
  
  Hell, it goes back even further than that. But, it's one of those things that's worth reminding people about, because they often forget. :)
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Derek Kerton (profile), 2 Oct 2008 @ 11:05am

Eyeballs
The term "eyeballs" was the scourge of the dot-bomb era. However, it was never entirely stupid. Eyeballs are necessary, important, and very often a precursor to profitability. The problem with the late 90s was that eyeballs were seen as an end in themselves.

Today, VCs and smart start-ups still value eyeballs, since they represent poof of real demand, traction, an useful product or service, product maturity, and a marketable customer base. But good start-ups usually have a "phase 2" that can explain how to monetize the eyeballs to be profitable in the medium term.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 15 Dec 2009 @ 9:40am

BUS
[ link to this | view in chronology ]