Disney Used Anonymous Online Quotes In Ads
from the as-good-as-made-up dept
You've all seen movie advertisements that include snippets of glowing quotes from critics. "Marvelous!" "Best Movie of the Year!" etc. There's been some controversy about these quotes in the past. There was an investigation into studios taking movie critic quotes completely out of context, and even a lawsuit against Sony Pictures for making up a critic and his quotes for movie ads. It appears that Disney has now been caught trying out a new tactic: using quotes from anonymous internet commenters on IMDB. These "commenters" could be, for example, Disney employees, but go under usernames like "Theedge-4" and "Mjavfc1." Apparently, that's good enough for Disney to quote them in their ads. While there's something to be said for tapping into a wider group of folks than just the big name "professional" movie critics and reviewers, this one seems pretty questionable and open to abuse -- especially given the industry's documented history of made up reviews.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: ads, critics, online reviews, quotes, reviewers
Companies: disney
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Fair Use
Associated Press
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Fair Use
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Fair Use
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous versus no attribution
"Disney attacked for promoting The Boy In The Striped Pyjamas with blog quotes
Disney has come under attack for promoting a film using favourable reviews from online bloggers instead of recognised film critics."
Were the glowing quotes attributed to "Theedge-4" and "Mjavfc1" who were clearly identified as users on IMDB? If so, then not only don't I see a problem with this, but the headline is accurate (albeit wrongheaded). We may not know the legal name of "Theedge-4", however, that person does have an identity in the context of the IMDB community.
But if by "anonymous" they really mean that the quotes appeared without any kind of attribution, then the headline is misleading. There's a big difference between using quotes from bloggers and commentors (as log as they're clearly identified as such) and using a quote without any indication of who the author is. Just because professional movie reviewers feel threatened by blogs and commenters, doesn't mean that this "threat" is wrong or worthy of attack.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
From what I can see
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: From what I can see
How do you know? As far as I can tell from the original article, this was never clearly spelled out. Did you see one of the actual ads?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: From what I can see
"The praise included "Simply stunning" from a blogger called Theedge-4, and "Please please see this film", written by Mjavfc1."
That sounds to me like they at least put the names of the people who they were quoting. I could be mistaken, douse anyone have a link so we can see this ad?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: From what I can see
Perhaps I'm being too literal, but the quote above doesn't actually say that the screen names were included in the ad. Based on the fact that IMDB gave their permission to use the quote, obviously they knew the screen names of the commentors. They could have passed this information along to the people who created the add. And it could have been discovered by the author of the original article. But none of this necessarily means that this information was included in the article. Besides, how ridiculous would it looks to have those screen names in a movie ad?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who cares?
I remember the poster for "Alien Resurrection" had a rave review that said "Best 'Alien' yet!" I have a tough time believing they found ANY legitimate critic willing to say that, and I laughed when I saw the quote. No rational person chooses a movie to see based on an unattributed quote in the ad.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Who cares?
1.) The line between professional critic and Joe Movie-goer is blurred by Web 2.0lolol. Netflix, IMDB, and plenty of other sites let any old person become a critic by writing their opinion and having people vote it to the top of the list.
2.) "Professional critics" generally don't have a clue. They're so deep in the technicalities of a movie that they forget that most of us aren't professional critics and judge a movie based on whether it was entertaining or not. I almost always disagree with the general critic consensus.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fictional
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Fictional
+1 insightful
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Otherwise, it's kind of like Mazda quoting the janitor who sweeps the floors at Car and Driver magazine.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
my two bits
FTFA:
A Ha. The correct response here is, "So what?"
Presumably the opinion expressed, regardless of the screen name or the person behind it, reflects the writer's actual opinion. So what if it's the producer?
I'm pretty certain that anybody reading the attribution, including my Grandmother who knows squat about the internet, would recognize "Pinkboy1983", "angry dude", or "Dosquatch" as something other than the person's given name and treat it with the appropriate skepticism.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: my two bits
And just for the record - and also my opinion - but I treat "professional" critics with the same skepticism. Most of them are too preoccupied with "Art" over "Watchability". This is how things like "Brokeback Mountain" are released to "critical acclaim".
Sure, spectacular filmography, bold story, emotion, love, loss... it would be fabulous except that it's just a solid chore to actually watch it.
Hmm. On second thought, maybe I should give even MORE credence to theedge-4.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Unimpressed
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wait.....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
BEST!
-BlowURmindBowel
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Movie theater managers' comment
-RegencyManager3710
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
you people are funny
the general idea is that disney employees can simply make accounts and quote their own bs, making it just some pride issue with a real blogger/critic who feel "well that means MY little wittle quote didnt have a chance to be used! grrrr".
im not saying we should believe these "quotes" but seriously, it just shows how stupid companies are and how bad they are marketing their product.
its just plain comedy to see
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not that any one person's opinion is more valid than another, but if someone is on the fence about seeing a movie and sees the ad and comes away thinking, "well, if all those critics liked it maybe it's worth seeing" then Disney is intentionally misleading the public.
They aren't doing anything necessarily illegal, but it's still a case of capitalizing on and abusing people's natural expectations.
If they wanted to be above board about this, they would at least attribute the quotes to "IMDB member." But that would defeat the whole point of what they're trying to do.
What it comes down to is yet another reason the studios shouldn't be surprised when people get fed up with being cheated and download movies!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Two points
But, again, what are movie companies supposed to do, use the quote that says "That was two hours of my life I'll never get back" or "That was a complete waste of $10".
Second, like the other posters are saying, does anyone even believe quotes shown during commercials? From the ads for "Spider-Man 2", I could have sworn it was the greatest movie ever made. In fact, I think one quote even said it was better than "Citizen Kane", which ranks as the best movie of all-time. I was disappointed when it was just a "very good" movie and not the best movie ever made, of all time, in the history of cinema, like the commercials said it was.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ha!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Disney "product"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]