If The Google-Yahoo Deal Is Bad For Advertisers Or Publishers, Isn't That Just An Opportunity?

from the what's-the-problem? dept

I recognize that in times of financial crisis, it may seem more difficult than ever to imagine unique and innovative opportunities cropping up -- but it's often in such times that the most innovative businesses are formed. How quickly we forget, for instance, that Google's own business model was formed during the barren years following the last dot com bubble burst. Yet, for some reason, people seem to think that today's offerings are the be-all and end-all of innovation. That's why we get these articles worrying about how a Google-Yahoo ad deal will be bad for advertisers and publishers. Yet, there's little evidence to actually support that. The article linked above cites the easily disproved anecdote from the NY Times last month about one guy who had a spammy site that Google punished. That was the guy's own fault, not Google's.

But, really, the most important point ignored in most of these discussions is that if Google really does make ad prices higher and share less with its AdSense publisher partners, that would create a huge opportunity for others, whether large incumbents or small startups, to step into that breach. If I had to bet, I'd say that there are already companies working on solutions that are more interesting and more valuable than Google's advertising plays. There are companies who are recognizing that "advertising" is not necessarily the best model, and they're working on better solutions that won't even seem like advertising at all -- but will start to take advertising dollars away from traditional ad companies. Just as Microsoft couldn't see the threat of Google for many years, Google won't even notice these companies on its radar, and while everyone's fretting a Google "monopoly" in search ads, the next revolution will be bubbling up somewhere else entirely.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: advertising, antitrust, monopolies, search
Companies: google, yahoo


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    ChurchHatesTucker (profile), 7 Oct 2008 @ 12:45pm

    Guess?

    " If I had to bet, I'd say that there are already companies working on solutions that are more interesting and more valuable than Google's advertising plays."

    Have you heard from such companies? Or is your point that it's not really unfair?

    Just curious, as I don't see what the fuss is about, myself.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Mike (profile), 7 Oct 2008 @ 2:07pm

      Re: Guess?

      Have you heard from such companies?

      Well, yes, I know of some companies that are doing some interesting things, but the real point is that it shouldn't matter. The opportunity is there for the taking.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Willton, 7 Oct 2008 @ 4:07pm

        Re: Re: Guess?

        Well, yes, I know of some companies that are doing some interesting things, but the real point is that it shouldn't matter. The opportunity is there for the taking.

        But doesn't that assume that there are no barriers to entry? I certainly don't know much about this field of industry, but I would think that the barriers are significant, given the few players in the field.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          Mike (profile), 7 Oct 2008 @ 9:17pm

          Re: Re: Re: Guess?

          But doesn't that assume that there are no barriers to entry? I certainly don't know much about this field of industry, but I would think that the barriers are significant, given the few players in the field.

          Not at all. The barriers to entering into providing a better solution for ad dollars is quite small indeed.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 7 Oct 2008 @ 2:56pm

      Re: Guess?

      www.ASK.COM is a lot easier than Google with it's plan english approach.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    NeoConBushSupporter, 7 Oct 2008 @ 12:47pm

    Mike is right!

    When god closes a door he opens a window . . .


    VOTE McCain 2008 - Cause real change would be real scary!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Mogilny, 7 Oct 2008 @ 1:11pm

    Very glass half full of you

    But, search ad needs a search engine. So far, attempts at a competitive search engine are pathetic.

    Btw, AdSense is Google's display ad business. I think you are referring to Adwords.

    VOTE McCain 2008 - Cause I want to see more Palin Fey on SNL!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Mike (profile), 7 Oct 2008 @ 2:10pm

      Re: Very glass half full of you

      But, search ad needs a search engine. So far, attempts at a competitive search engine are pathetic.

      It's not really just about search advertising.

      Btw, AdSense is Google's display ad business. I think you are referring to Adwords.

      AdSense isn't display ads, it's contextual ads, which come from its AdWords search ads business. So they're related.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Scott Lithgow, 7 Oct 2008 @ 3:42pm

    options are good

    The less options we have the more we get charged

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.