All Fear The Mobile Phone Botnets... That Don't Actually Exist

from the this-again? dept

Fri, Oct 17th 2008 4:20pm — Mike Masnick

For many years, we saw stories, usually pushed by security software companies, about how mobile phone viruses were some huge threat that had to be dealt with quickly before they spread around the world. Of course, that hasn't actually happened -- and there are some good reasons why it's unlikely. In fact, it seemed like such stories had been decreasing lately, perhaps in part due to some security firms scolding competitors for mobile virus FUD.

So, we were a bit surprised to see yet another story on the subject, this time suggesting that we're on the verge of (I'm not making this up) a "Cell Phone Zombie Uprising." Some researchers are predicting that mobile phones would be perfect for botnets, though, again it's not clear how that would actually happen, given the limitations of phones. While it is true that phones have become more powerful (and open) over the past few years, there still hasn't been much evidence that viruses and such are a real threat. Most phones are designed well enough to not make it easy for apps to just install themselves -- so consider us skeptical until there's real evidence of a mobile botnet rising.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: botnet, fud, mobile, virus

11 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

TX CHL Instructor (profile), 17 Oct 2008 @ 5:06pm

Android
The new Google phone isn't going to be all that limited. In fact, a "jailbroken" iPhone will do a pretty good job of running a wide variety of *nix applications.

In fact, either of those phones has substantially more computing power than the desktop PC of 15 years ago. It's only a matter of time before somebody unleashes all that power via some malware.
--
www.chl-tx.com Nothing deters violent crime as effectively as the possibility of getting shot by your intended victim. Nothing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- jED, 18 Oct 2008 @ 4:08pm
  
  Re: Android
  You have not factored in a number of issues. Have you ever seen a zombie botnet consisting of security conscious Linux distros? Not to mention how locked down the Android operating system is compared to normal Linux distros.
  
  If an open source OS become the general standard for mobile phones the longer it exists the smaller this threat becomes. It's the beauty of open source.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Xanius, 17 Oct 2008 @ 5:36pm

RE:Android
The problem with them trying to convince people that their phone will become a zombie is the same problem with cell phone anti-virus software. Any malware on the phone is going to suck up my battery forcing me to take a look through it or at least contact my carrier for support. 90% of the carrier solutions involve a hard reset of the phone, boom virus gone because you can't write to rom while in the OS and my battery life is better.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Matt Bennett, 17 Oct 2008 @ 6:36pm

just the same, as phones become more like mini-comps, this problem WILL increase.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Joseph Durnal, 17 Oct 2008 @ 8:05pm

It is something to think about
Just like windows & word. The more features they put into anything, the more exploitable it will become. Remember when Microsoft Word Macros could start running Visual Basic code, it opened up tons of awesome features, but turned into a malware writer's dream. Even after that, Microsoft decided to tie the browser to the OS, opening up a whole new can of worms. There will be a big mobile phone worm, it is only a matter of time, but it doesn't bother me much, I actually prefer a simple phone for making phone calls, not a development platform for any type of application someone can dream up!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Np Six Pack, 17 Oct 2008 @ 8:13pm
  
  Re: It is something to think about
  How do you know the "bugs" were not intentional ?
  
  .... Something to think about
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Joseph Durnal, 17 Oct 2008 @ 8:19pm
    
    Re: Re: It is something to think about
    Word macro viruses from back in the late 90's kept WordPerfect and Ami/WordPro afloat longer than they should have been afloat. Hmm, maybe M$ wanted to keep those products with some market share to avoid the antitrust suits!
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Allen (profile), 20 Oct 2008 @ 1:51am

It's about critical mass
So far WinTel's overwhelming user base has negated the need for non-WinTel viruses and botnets.

So far we do not have a mobile device (or family of devices) that is/are widely enough deployed to make it worth the effort. Sure mobile devices are getting more powerful. No doubt they could find exploitable security holes if they wanted to. Certainly they could try "CLICK NOW HERE FOR VIRUS REMOVE" social exploits. But why bother when there are more than enough WinTel marks out there to exploit?

That's not to say that the situation wont ever change. But it's too early to be doing the chicken little act just yet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- mobiGeek, 20 Oct 2008 @ 11:22am
  
  Re: It's about critical mass
  o far we do not have a mobile device (or family of devices) that is/are widely enough deployed to make it worth the effort.
  I'd bet that Nokia/Symbian would argue quite differently.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Brian, 20 Oct 2008 @ 2:06am

One also consider that most machines in "traditional" botnets don't run on batteries that are unlikely to last more than a couple hours in the face of heavy network traffic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anthony, 27 Oct 2009 @ 10:08pm

mobile virus
WARNING

Do not be caught with your pants down,
As cell phone use becomes more of a need rather then a want.
The hackers will find a way to make your life miserable.
Goto www.phoneguard.com
NOW and get your mobile anti-virus before you wish you did.

REGARDS.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]