American Airlines Cuts & Pastes Its Keyword Ad Lawsuit; Tries Again With Yahoo
from the search-and-replace dept
Last year, we were surprised to see American Airlines sue Google over the fact that competitors were buying keyword-based ads on American Airlines' trademarks. Plenty of similar lawsuits had been brought, but for the most part (in the US at least), search engines are on the right side of the law. First of all, simply buying keywords based on trademarks isn't considered a violation of the trademark. Trademark law doesn't give you total control over the mark, but it is designed to prevent confusing uses. Advertising against a competitor isn't a confusing use by itself, so long as it's clear that the advertiser is different from the trademark holder. Second, and more importantly, even if it was a violation of trademark, the liability should fall on the advertiser, not the search engine. Since the search engine is just a platform, the real claim should be against whoever created and paid for the advertisement.Given that the search engines have come out on top in many such cases, we were surprised this past summer to see Google and American Airlines settle the case, while keeping the actual details secret. Initially, it appeared that Google had won the settlement, as it was still possible to find those competing ads. However, it's possible that the terms of the settlement hadn't taken effect yet, as a more recent search no longer finds those ads. Even more damning is the news that American Airlines has now basically done a copy & paste and search & replace on the original lawsuit and re-filed it against Yahoo. It even includes the same mistakes as the first lawsuit. As Eric Goldman notes, this is strange for a variety of reasons, including the fact that Yahoo is known to be much more friendly to trademark holders in such cases. However, this certainly suggests that Google may have caved in its settlement, rather than the other way around. If so, that would have been an unfortunate decision by Google, and Google's settlement may only lead to more trademark holders taking their chances on suing as well.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: search ads, trademark
Companies: american airlines, google, yahoo
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is a lawsuit a first or last resort?
I wonder how many of these lawsuits wouldn't even need to be filed if people just asked for the practice to stop.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is there anyone they haven't caved into yet, from newspapers to the Chinese govt.?
Google has become a whore, unable to keep their legs closed. They're the battered wife, completely incapable of standing up for themselves, desperately willing to pay off their tormentor with complacency (and dollars).
I have no respect for them at all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Leave Yahoo alone
Funny how having a good service or product can trump petty issues where you're in the wrong in the first place.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
previous comments
Crystalattice has the candor and decency to use the word "wonder". The answer is that in high-stakes fields it will not usually get us very far to write a letter -- but it's a good way to start off on a civilized footing, and in some cases will produce a favorable result.
Anonymous Coward has good reason to want anonymity. He or she understands how to be vulgar but not how to present substantiated facts. Tch!
Nathania has some good points, in an abstract sense -- but is in the wrong forum. This is about trademarks, not legitimate complaints against the company.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]