California Schools Not Using $200 Million From The Microsoft Settlement
from the not-a-priority? dept
A few years back, in settling a civil lawsuit against Microsoft for its monopolistic practices, Microsoft agreed to pay out $250 million to California schools, in the form of vouchers. Now, there are some who might point out that this sort of "settlement" makes good business sense, in that many will use the vouchers on PCs with Microsoft software, thereby getting a new generation of kids hooked on Microsoft products (it's worth pointing out that the vouchers can be used on non-Microsoft software as well). However, that's hardly the biggest issue, apparently. Instead, people are realizing that the vast majority of the $250 million is not being used by the schools. Some are pointing out that their budgets are being slashed, and since they have to pay for the equipment upfront and then request money back later, it's just too much trouble. Others are saying it just hasn't been a priority, even though they know the money is available.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: antitrust, california, schools, settlement
Companies: microsoft
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
they're not using the money because....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
they're not using the money because....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Make work school project...
I know who wins when a lawsuit is settled by rebates and coupons to grieved customers, the lawyers who try the case get real money, the best kind of gift certificate.
Now I get mail from lawyers stating: "I may have already won..."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Make work school project...
Wow... So a government job pays $250 million? Where do I sign up? :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There's no excuse for schools not using this money. You can make claims based on hardware purchases alone, not just software.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
to teachers who really need these
equipments for their classes who probably
could find a way to advance the money
and immediately claim reimbursement from
these vouchers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
@Ajax 4Hire
Like I said, those who don't know how to do anything else run schools.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is misleading
It's disappointing to see that, when public officials plan finances responsibly, the press is spinning it to portray it as waste.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This is misleading
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
@Cynic
Max Eissler just made a fool of you. Schools (like businesses) have to work within a budget and life cycles. There's no need to buy stuff when it isn't needed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Open Source?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Open Source?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What an outrage
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What an outrage
If you have $50,000 that can only be spent on software, and you don't have any software expenses this year, do you think that you should just go out and find some expensive software that you don't really need just so you can spend it right now? Or should you save it for when you do have software expenses? When you do the latter, you can take the budget money which would have gone to that software (and doesn't carry the same restrictions) and use it for more needy programs instead.
This story was sensationalist and misleading, and I hope that it doesn't lead to an innapropriate outcry that will force IT leaders to make irresponsible purchases.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Totally Microsoft-ish
http://www.livbit.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]