White House Gives Banks One Year To Stop Online Gambling Transactions, Despite Protests
from the pushing-through-bad-rules dept
Despite significant questions from other elected officials about the plan, the White House has, in fact, approved new regulations requiring banks to stop any financial transactions dealing with online gambling. They've given banks one year to figure out a way to deal with it -- which hopefully gives Congress enough time to change the law.The regulations make little sense for a variety of reasons:
- It's still not clear why online gambling should be made totally illegal, rather than simply regulated, like in many countries.
- It makes no sense to put the burden and liability on financial institutions to figure out what transactions involve online gambling.
- It makes even less sense to dump this on banks right now, especially as many are struggling merely to survive in this financial climate. Adding an extra burden of making them figure out if every transaction involves online gambling seems unnecessary (and perhaps unusual).
- Congress had asked the White House for more time to explore the impact of these regulations, but the White House used a lobbyist to aggressively push for these regulations to be put in place as quickly as possible.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: enforcement, online gambling
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Online Gambling
According to Bush, the poker sites are all funding terrorism, maybe some are, but I won't go there, I'll just stick to the offshore... And target a particular industry, horse racing.
Offshore sites have almost 0 overhead, so they can afford to only take 5-10% out of every dollar that gets bet. They pay a couple people in a call center, a janitor, some admin, and a few IT people to maintain servers/code, the rest, is a nice big profit. Also of note, some of these offshore gambling sites do not even pay for the product, instead rebroadcasting an effectively stolen product for profit.
Now compare this to a racetrack. Racetracks have takeouts anywhere from 7-30%, but the money is re-distributed a little more. Half of the take-out goes to pay for the physical building, the teller/cashier, admin staff, maintanence staff, janitorial staff, cooks, servers, etc, etc, with a bit of profit left over. The other half goes to the horseman for racing in the form of a purse, this goes to pay for the stabling, the training, the feeding, the grooming, breeding, etc of the horse. In any given state/province, a racetrack can directly or indirectly create 30000 jobs, or even much more than that. These jobs are currently in trouble at MANY different race-tracks.
Now you tell me, would you, as a government, want to support a technology that creates dozens of jobs but destroys a business that creates 10s of thousands?
Oh, and if you think 10-30% is a high takeout, check your local lotteries and casinos, 30% will seem low after that...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Burden?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Burden?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Burden?
This is not as cut and dry as a list, you have to remember how often this list would need to be updated as these sites can simply re-incorporate under whatever name they want whenever they want.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
WTO
You have even posted comments from the WTO, about the USA NOT having ONLINE gambling..
to the POINT the WTo has FINED the USA for not allowing ONLINE gambling..And those other countries can STILL bring case against the USA for NOT allowing it..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If they don't go after things like on line gambling then they might not have any accomplishments to thrust at an impatient electorate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RE: Anonymous Coward
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
help
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
last gasp of the dying neocons
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Online Gambling
Let's pretend I'm Joe Schmoe, and I make my living by ripping people off.
That bieng said...I just found a texas hold'em site that will give me a 100.00 dollar credit just for signing up. The only thing I need is a valid checking account. So I run down to my closest bank and open up a checking account. With my new checking account, I go online and sign up for a new account, and recieve my 100.00 free US dollars to gamble with however I see fit.
If I win big, I don't bother the checking account that I just opened up the day before.
But if I LOSE, I go down to the bank the very next day and close the account. When the collecting party tries to get COLLECT the debt....bad news.....no such account exists.
Online gambling should be illegal (in my opinion), simply because the internet makes it far too easy for dishonest people to be dishonest.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Online Gambling
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Online Gambling
There are 100's of ways to get your money to/from the websites. And no one is going to be able to maintain a list of all the different ways to do it. For one reason. They don't all fall under the umbrella of control of one country or one set of laws.
For every one that has been stopped in the last year, another two have replaced it. And the poker sites aren't stupid. They switch their providers just as fast.
I don't have to touch my bank account (except my local ATM machine) in order to put money on any number online poker sites. Once it's in cash form, you can't track it without implementing some new functionality in the system. What are they going to do, require me to tell them what I'm using the cash for before they allow me to have it?
Cash -> Money Order -> any 1 of 1000's of online payment processing sites that are used for a million things besides poker as well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Online Gambling
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
it is not illegal
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
privacy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It makes little sense for a country but plenty of sense for a political party who is bitter to try and sabotage the incoming POTUS by undermining the banking system.
I know it sounds conspiratorial, but it really DOES make sense that, after loosing both House and Senate, and now the Presidency, the GOP is doing what it can to ensure that it will be fighting fit in 4 years.
No matter the cost.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seriously, quite a few decisions are still made in American with regard to religion. Not necessarily _controlled_ by religion, but definitely made with the religious voting block in mind.
You see, Iran and the US have more in common than everyone thought!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RE: #15
Bush has been trying to ban online gambling for a long time, in fact gambling has always been a social issue for the GOP. The Republicans are morally opposed to gambling and fight any expansion of gambling at every opportunity. This isn't Bush trying to harm, control or otherwise regulate the banking industry, this is Bush trying to shrink the gambling industry.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: RE: #15
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
UIGEA what a joke
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: UIGEA what a joke
The US is run by control freaks and those with a holier-than-thou mentality. If my wife didn't insist that we live here to be closer to relatives, I'd have left a long time ago.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
internet gambling
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
bank gambling
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Stop Internet Gambling!!
CHARGEBACK THE HELL OUT OF THEM UNTIL THEY GO OUT OF BUSINESS! GEORGE BUSH WAS PROTECTING AMERICANS BY SIGNING THE LAW! YOU DON'T WIN IN ONLINE CASINOS AND IF YOU DO ITS JUST A MATTER OF TIME BEFORE THE BANKRUPT YOU!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]