Company Reinvents BountyQuest In Attempt To Bust Bogus Patents
from the if-it-works... dept
Many of you probably remember BountyQuest, the company set up by Tim O'Reilly and Jeff Bezos as an attempt to bust bogus patents by reaching out to the "wisdom of the crowd" to dig up prior art. The initiative got plenty of attention, thanks to Bezos' and O'Reilly's involvement, but the project faded out and eventually just shut down after it failed in its high profile attempt to invalidate Bezos' own infamous "one-click patent" (which has since run into troubles on prior art found by others).Apparently, though, there's a new startup that's attempting to do pretty much the same thing. The Associated Press has an article about Article One Partners, whose business plan sounds like a photocopy of BountyQuest's original plan. Apparently the AP reporters weren't aware of BountyQuest, because it's not mentioned in the article. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but considering the striking similarities between the two operations, you'd think it would at least merit a mention. Hopefully Article One can survive where BountyQuest flopped, but I'm not that hopeful, honestly. It could potentially work for a few high profile patents, but on average, it's tough to get random people to get excited about digging up prior art on patents.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: crowdsourcing, patents, prior art
Companies: article one, bountyquest
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
ironic monthly
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The value of the historical record
I'm actually more baffled by the fact that the memory of BountyQuest effort seems to have been lost so rapidly. I suppose in the internet age, historical cycles are much shorter than us "old folks" are accustomed to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Are we sure this is a good thing?
I don't know which it is, but I'd say let's not be too hasty at celebrating the appearance of this new organization. They might not be anything we want to see.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's about patent validity
And as for BountyQuest, I saw one article mentioned the founder used to be part of the earlier company, so that covers reaching out to them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
stop the shilling!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
another horseshit from Mikey
or "the hive mind of slashbot"...
or "the combined intelligence of techdirt lemming-punks"
I woudn't trust you guys to clean my toilets, much less to dig up prior art on patents...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]