Facebook Sued For Patent Infringement
from the welcome-to-the-big-time dept
It's pretty much a rite of passage for any tech company these days, as you get larger and more recognized, some company that has an overly broad and probably obvious patent will sue you for patent infringement. For the company in question, the lawsuit is as much a publicity event as it is an attempt to squeeze revenue from an actual innovator. The latest example of this is with an Ohio company no one's heard of called Leader Technologies, who is suing Facebook for patent infringement, and was kind enough to send out a press release announcing this before Facebook even got to see the lawsuit. Clearly, this is a publicity stunt.As for the patent itself, it basically describes the rather obvious process of associating a piece of data with multiple categories. It's almost surprising that the company is suing Facebook instead of Google. While I'm not a heavy Facebook user, I'm not sure where Facebook uses such a system. Google, however, has made widespread use of a similar idea with its Gmail "labels." The idea is that rather than sorting data into a specific folder or category, it can be associated with multiple categories. If that seems rather obvious and ridiculously broad, well, that's the patent system for you these days.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: associations, data, patents, publicity stunt
Companies: facebook, leader technologies
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
come on, "associating a piece of data with multiple categories"?? we all do that at least a million times a day! these frivolous litigators should really just shut the fuck up and stick their "patent" up there ass where it came from.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Tech behavior
Also, everyone want something for free like music so I recommend that you create it and give it away. What's is your is your and you have a right to do what you want to do with it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sue EVERYONE!!
Not only is this idea obvious, the chances of someone ELSE owning such a patent is likely given the widespread use of such a broad patent years before the Internet was handed over to the public domain.
FAIL
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Seconded.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seriously, Mr. Masnick, are you such an expert in the technology field that you can make such a statement without even having reviewed the application as originally filed, together with the file wrapper history associated with its prosecution before the patent office?
I urge you to stick with your economic arguments and view that patents and copyrights are "monopolies", and resist the urge to dip your feet into "legal waters in which you have no substantive experience. The former is within your area of expertise. The latter most certainly is not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
He knows nothing about real economy and even less about tech
His degree is in PR
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Unless I'm mistaken, this patent is on the definition of database.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
acdc
I didn't realize you were being ironic until I got to this bit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RDBMS
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
?
Visit P2P Tech Time http://www.p2ptechtime.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The patent defines almost any trivial web application today.
I should patent the process of requiring users to click on links for site navigation. Now that is novel!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
i'm going to patent chewing and make billions
Refers to previous patent #100,230,994,202,451 for process called "Sense of Taste".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Trolls
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What Next? a Lawsuit for breathing oxygen, maybe?
Has someone patented the 'process of breathing in and breathing out', yet? Must check out right away!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Labels...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Never heard of them before, eh?
Now there's something to hang your hat on... If my business had anything whatsoever to do with the government's response to that disaster, I'd be doing everything in my power NOT to publicize it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Many-Many Joins..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Many-Many Joins..
As SCO learned, going up against IBM in a patent battle is anything but trivial.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I like this bit
How does this have anything to do with the design of the system???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I like this bit
It likely doesn't, but nothing says that an infringing article must infringe every claim of a patent. It only needs to infringe one claim.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Quicker is keeper
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pat
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It is extremely common for a small company to release a press release just before doing something extreme, like filing a lawsuit against a major corperation, because they need some real and factual information out in the media so that when someone searches the topic they don't just end up with a bullshit, unresearched article from Techdirt.
Do you really think that a small business, like Leader, would invest an unimaginable amount of time and money into a lawsuit that they thought or knew was bullshit? Also, if the patent and the lawsuit are indeed a load of shit, as you make clear is your opinion, why was it not tossed out? Why did it make it all the way to trial?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]