Yet Another Study Shows That Social Networks Are Good For Kids

from the yet-politicians-still-want-them-blocked-in-schools dept

Thu, Nov 20th 2008 4:44am — Mike Masnick

This has been covered before, of course, but it's always good to see more research on the subject. The MacArthur Foundation has just released Mizuko Ito's latest study about online socializing, and found that it's an important and healthy part of youth communications these days, and politicians and parents who freak out over the amount of time kids spend chatting with each other online are overreacting. Hopefully, with more studies like this, we can get politicians to stop trying to ban social networks in school, and recognize that it can be a healthy part of the way kids communicate.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: children, communication, social networks

9 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Gunnar, 20 Nov 2008 @ 6:08am

First you have to convince schools that communication is good for kids.

If it were up to administrators, kids wouldn't be allowed to talk at lunch, let alone in class or the halls.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tony, 20 Nov 2008 @ 6:21am

I can see the point of allowing this - but what's wrong with just talking to the other kids in school/neighborhood? I'm not for kids just hanging out on computers all day - regardless of if they're 'socializing'. I have two young kids and I already don't want to have them on the computer or text messaging all day. Get out and do something!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Typical Techdirt Reader, 20 Nov 2008 @ 7:09am
  
  Re:
  No, you are wrong. Soon we will be hooked up to our computers and live in a matrix type world and the need for personal interaction and socializing will unnecessary. Parents of children are such idiots.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
sam, 20 Nov 2008 @ 8:17am

waht ever
Yea having my kids talk online about sex, drugs, ipods, and being cool is always a good thing.

http://christi.ath.cx/stuff/index.cfm.htm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
SFU Teaching Assistant, 20 Nov 2008 @ 8:25am

Yet another study...
Social netowrking sites CAN be good for kids as a PART of their entire socializing activities, but the danger is in kids avoiding in-person socializing in favour of remaining in front of a computer screen. As a grad student and teaching assistant in a major Canadian university at a "wireless" campus, my problem is in class lectures or tutorials where students are spending more time using Facebook, Twitter, MSN Messenger, and even the lowly cell phone text message during lectures or class time instead of paying attention to the professor. And then what happens? They come to tutorial having not paid attention to the lecture, usually not having read the assignment, and then asking me what happened in a class that they were attending. I would love to have a way to ban social networking sites and MSN in lectures, but so far the only tools I have are threatening to sit in the back of the room to see just who is paying attention and who isn't, public embarassment of students caught actively ignoring the lecture, and using their guilty response as general deterrence to the rest of the population. Given that I'm in the Criminology department, that might suit our lesson plans.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 20 Nov 2008 @ 9:31am

I agree with SFU Teaching Assistant. Online social networking sites have their advantages, but like many other things, can be abused. There is such a thing as "too much of a good thing".

When children spend too much time socializing online, they dissociate from real world activities, as well as real world emotions and thought processes. The internet brings with it a whole new way of understanding human emotions and behaviors, which should not be minimized or neglected in such discussions, such as online social networking.

The nuances of communication via the internet are not the same as that of face-to-face (f2f). Many aspects of f2f communication are altered, or even lost, online. What impact this form of communication has on a whole generation is not widely understood, but some researchers are focusing more and more on understanding it all (see John Suler's Psychology of Cyberspace at http://www-usr.rider.edu/~suler/psycyber/psycyber.html).

While the benefits of online social networking should not be minimized, neither should the disadvantages.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 20 Nov 2008 @ 10:01am

King of the Hill
Reminds me of a recent King of the Hill. Some lady working for stricklan propane puts the company up on facebook. She later gets reprimended for he lack of work and she creates a flash mob of her 'friends', which goes out of control.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jesse, 20 Nov 2008 @ 11:33am

Social Networking should accent communication not become primary...
As stated by SFU Teaching Assistant, and others, there is nothing wrong with online social networking and communication - it is a positive experience when it is a continuation of a healthy "face-to-face" social life. What is happening though is younger people are ignoring face-to-face relationships in many ways and are now supplanting them with far to much online presence - it is kind of sad really. Another problem is that online communication tends to skew to the near retarded side. Punctuation, grammar and style suffer horrendously ( I am a prime example of this :) and I believe that is why reading and writing skills have dropped considerably. So online communication can open up whole new worlds to extend communication - we just have to be careful it is not at the cost of real world relationships and communication.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
tracker1, 20 Nov 2008 @ 1:57pm

heh..
I'd be happy if they lifted the ban on twitter at work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]