France Requires Online Publication Of Certain Laws To Be Valid
from the seems-like-a-good-thing dept
Laurent GUERBY writes in to point us to some news of a new decree from the French government, supposedly saying that all laws must be published on the prime minister's website to be valid (link in French, Google translation to English). Guerby's reading is that this means if the government does not publish all laws on the prime minister's website by May of next year, any unpublished law is no longer valid. Not knowing much French, it's not clear to me if that's actually the case, but I would love for anyone else to chime in on this. If true, though, it certainly makes sense, and makes you wonder why France hasn't been publishing laws online for years.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
As far as I read it...
The sarcastic comment in the the French post suggests that bureaucrats have four months to gather and sort all the administrative orders ever issued.
The other part of the post mentions how this is a blow to administrative secrecy and how everything needs to be public, able to be examined and findable.
HTH,
Chris.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Still, a step in the right direction.
Now if they were to do the same with all the laws, and have the server hacked...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The benefit of print is that there are multiple duplicate copies which can be verified.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I doubt
Really though, this should be policy everyplace, of course the laws should be written so someone knowledgeable of the field it covers should understand it too. Then lawyer stuff could be impossible for anyone to read, while other laws like health codes (which get wildly thrown out of wack) Would have to be written so a high schooler could understand them.
And please help us for traffic laws vs what really happens.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I doubt
They have their own president and everything. And a big tower that they copied from that hotel in Las Vegas.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I doubt
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I doubt
They have their own president and everything. And a big tower that they copied from that hotel in Las Vegas.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I doubt
a snippet from wiki :
As in 'Secretary of State', get it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Some companies own the copyrights
Doesn't bode well for full transparency in the U.S., but other countries may be able to make good use of the resulting increase in civic participation if they don't face similar roadblocks.
I for one would love to be able to google every law passed by my so-called public servants, who apparently are there to serve someone else's interest and to keep me ignorant about the laws they will then accuse me of breaking, but for which I am supposed to be cognizant of... *sigh*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Journal Officiel
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It is a very positive move. Nobody will have to go to their local city hall (mairie) to know how Government interprets the law for its staff; everything will have to be online.
It is also sensible to have it on the Prime MInister's website rather than on Legifrance which holds the Constitution, all legislation (parliament and government) and all courts' decision, because Legisfrance published documents having binding legal force or highly influencal.
The decree translates as following: "The interpretative documents and instructions addressed by the ministers to all services and governmental organisations will have to be made available to the public on a website linked to the Prime Minister. They will be classified and categorised to ease use. Any document not on the website will be deemed non usable...."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Instead of suing with FOIA-like laws to know what the government told your public servant to do, it's just much simpler to have those on the web in the first place and otherwise you argue they're not valid, end of story.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]