Wrongfully Blaming Hackers For Rainforest Deforestation
from the blame-the-actual-logging-companies dept
Here's an odd one. Apparently the folks at Greenpeace are claiming that a move to computerize the permit system for logging companies in the Amazon rainforest allowed hackers employed by the logging companies to issue fake permits allowing them to log well beyond their quota. However, it's difficult to really see how the hackers or computerization really had much to do with this at all. Prior to that, the system was based entirely on paper, where it would seem much easier to forge a piece of paper. By moving it to a computerized system, if anything, it would seem to create a much better system for tracking and catching those that forge the permits. After all, any decent computer system should recognize if extra permits are being issued, or if they're forged completely, then a quick check via the computer should show that the permits being used are faked. An entirely paper-based system would allow for no such simple check.![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: deforestation, greenpeace, hackers, licenses, rain forest
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Think of the Children
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Think of the Children
"Think of the trees!!! Won't someone please THINK OF THE TREES!!!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Trees can grow back
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
man...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hackers?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hackers?
I seriously hope you are trolling. That has to be the most asinine statement I've ever heard. We have alternatives to using wood in the majority of things now, and a cheap means to use them.
We simply don't NEED wood anymore, but due to illegal logging there is so much supply its 'cheap enough' to make it worthwhile (meanwhile for consumers its a 'luxury' item).
And for what purpose? We don't even fully comprehend the atmospheric effects that our logging has, though there is good evidence it isn't good.
Also, you speak as if "nature" is an entity on its own right. News for you: it's *passive*. Nothing will magically show up to stop us from killing ourselves, or killing entire other species.
Relatively speaking, humans are pretty powerful. We're the only species (as far as I know) that can choose if another species lives or dies. With that kind of power comes a certain kind of responsibility. People really need to start growing up and accepting that responsibility, or it won't just be an economic crisis we're facing the next time around.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Huh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Huh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Huh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Huh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Huh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Genocide does solve some problems.
Let's start with all the over consuming Americans, that would be a good start.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Genocide does solve some problems.
That was an intelligent, well thought-out argument.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Genocide does solve some problems.
I didn't say that just the Americans were the only over consuming group of people (or peoples as you would pluralize), I just stated lets START with them.
It would certainly remove a large group of those consumers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
where are the details on the hack?
also, if greenpeace knows that these systems are vulnerable, why not use the vulnerability to prove their point? i would think that flooding the system with millions of permits for single trees would illustrate that point nicely. funny thing about backdoors, there are seldom any controls on who can use them.
not all crime committed with a computer is hacking, not all hacking is crime with a computer. con artists commit crimes all the time with computers and do very little hacking. a corrupt employee abusing his or her position is not hacking either.
this lack of disclosure does no one any good, except those who are committing these crimes. secrecy is a big part of the hacking game: those who exploit vulnerable systems for profit do not want their methods or their targets exposed, and victims do not want their vulnerabilities or their exploitation exposed. this gives the exploiters a tremendous amount of power.
that's the great thing about real hacking: if you share what you know, it takes the power away from the real bad guys that operate in secret.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good thread!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hackers again?
Then again, maybe the yahoos at Greenpeace got confused when they heard about "hackers" and thought about people "hacking" at trees with axes.
When they heard the hackers were going to "log off", well, that was just the last straw. "We need more trees, not logs!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dont follow your reasoning...
The idea that it could be worse if computers didn't exist is quite irrelevant: the fact is, they are there, and if they weren't hacked into, this planet would be a bit better off.
I don't have anything against hackers in general, but getting paid to destroy the planet takes off some glory, don't you think?
Juliette, from Greenpeace International
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
good or evil
In this case, it's the corruption that's the real story, and the hacking is a hook to get people interested.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]