Dr. Horrible Gives People A Reason To Buy The DVD
from the such-a-concept dept
One of the issues we regularly discuss around here when it comes to business models is the fact that anyone producing content needs to give consumers a real reason to actually buy something scarce. If it's just the same thing they can get elsewhere for free, there's not much incentive. It looks like Joss Whedon has taken at least some of that to heart. Earlier this year, Whedon got a lot of attention for the release of Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog, an online three-part video musical. While it seemed like some of the attention paid to it was overblown (oh my! TV people can make videos on the internet just like regular people!), that shouldn't take away from the fact that the video, itself was really, really good.From the beginning, the plan was always to then sell a DVD of the video, but some questioned if that would make sense, since the video was available for free online. Originally, the announced plan had been to only show the video online for free for a few short weeks, and then make people pay to see it -- but it looks like Whedon changed his mind on that one, as the video has stayed available. However, as Tom writes in to point out, it looks like Whedon and the others involved in the production have realized how to give people a reason to buy the DVD: by providing a ton of useful extras that even those who watched the original obsessively will find worthwhile to pay for. It includes behind the scenes stuff, and apparently a commentary track that is as amusing as the original video itself (and, apparently, includes new musical numbers). It's good to see folks realizing that to get people to buy stuff it helps to add value, not try to diminish it.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: dr. horrible, dvd, joss whedon, reason to buy
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
ELE entries
Fury of Solace
Doing evil so you don't have to
Somewhere in Los Angeles
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
btw, is anyone else hoping there is an option for bouncing ball style subtitles for the sung parts? I think it would be freakin awesome to have that. gather a group and everyone can sing along
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Instead of putting digital collectables, which are for practical purposes infinite, Whedon should sell scarce collectables. Maybe a miniature freeze ray. Maybe a few strands of that girl's hair. Maybe a golden ticket for an hour long man-date with NPH and a cameo in the next series.
Who knows what sort of things would work? But the concept of digital bonus isn't going to insulate Whedon against the economics of infinite supply.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Which girl? Felicia? 'Cause I would totally clone that.
(Oh wait, was that out loud?)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Apparently, it's you who is new here:
http://techdirt.com/articles/20080819/0314402026.shtml
We actually think content has tremendous value.
Now it says you can post a free video and still make money. Yet they are making money selling digital content that has no value
Wrong again. The DVD is a scarce good, and it provides convenience (another scarcity) over pure web content.
You can critique us if you like, but at least get your facts straight.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Sure I COULD go download all the extra content and burn copies for Yule Time, but that would take up my time and effort. I would have bought the DVD for $10 with no additional content.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Actually, my brother did exactly that for me, for my birthday a few months ago, with a nice disc label, and printouts of the online Captain Hammer comic. Oh, and a T-shirt. I, then, made copies of the DVD, to share with friends, to maximize the convenience for them (while wearing my T-shirt, of course). Now, guess how many copies of the published DVD my circle of friends will be buying.
I also pirated the soundtrack. And then promptly bought it as soon as it was available in a DRM-free format from Amazon.
What Dr. Horrible has is essentially a reverse patronage model. We buy because we want to support the creators, but more importantly, because we want them to create more.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
All the incentive people need...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't Forget...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Economics of infinite supply != no sales
Really, you guys take the cake.
Care to show any evidence to support your assertions regarding the "ecenomics of infinite supply"? And that is all they are: Assertions. Piracy often increases demand for the infinite goods which are being sold. Guess what? Time and again, publishers have found that by giving content away, they end up selling, more, not less. Techdirt has published many examples of this principle at work.
Why don't you get your facts straight.
Kind of makes me wonder if the MPAA/RIAA is playing the sock puppet game here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Economics of infinite supply != no sales
An object with infinite supply has value, however, due to the decreasing cost of reproduction it's cash value (or price) is limited. This concept is lost because people so quickly equate the two.
In this case, an additional infinite product is offered as an incentive. In other words, it can be reproduced infinitely.
That leaves me with a choice: violate copyright law designed to produce artificial scarcity OR pay for an infinite good.
I think Whedon is doing great by giving some incentive. However, I'd rather see something I can't reproduce. Sell me that with the DVD.
Also, the assertion that giving things away produces more sales is pretty interesting. Record sales may be falling. I don't know if that's due to the net or not (or even if sales have declined).
Are you suggesting that if the RIAA abandoned copyright and gave music away for free that record sales would magically increase?
I don't think it would. I think that the RIAA needs to offer something concrete with CD's to increase sales. Something scarce.
Like that girl's hair (is it extra creepy, the second time?). Or a chance at backstage passes to a concert. Heck you can even direct them to your RIAA website to enter info to check to see if they won.
It doesn't matter what they offer, just sweeten the deal. That's all I'm saying. Giving stuff away cannot magically generate money. You must develop a business plan that creates value for your product.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Economics of infinite supply != no sales
While I see your point about the infinite good being bundled with another infinite good, you fail to properly evaluate the fan base for Dr. Horrible. Many of those fans are willing to pay $10 for the DVD, because they want to support it. This is, I believe, what Mike calls "True Fans."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is the world finally growing wise?
'Cause it's plain to see, some kind of harmony
Is on the rise.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Small wonder why DRM first reared its ugly head, with other much more surreptitious schemes likely to follow. How sad that law abiding customers are paying the price because a few feel it is their "duty" to share the wealth...and the law be damned.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That being said, I won't pay more than seven dollars for a DVD, and I'd rather pay five. I don't care about the case, the liner notes, or even the special features. I just want the disc. If DVDs were cheaper, I would buy more of them. Since they're expensive, I'll watch television online.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
But just as important to me, the money goes to the creators. Whedon did this on his own dime and no studios are getting a cut. That pleases me immensely.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]