Details Emerge On Australian Lawsuit Against ISPs For Failing To Stop Piracy
from the that's-the-best-you-can-do dept
Last month, we wrote about the lawsuit filed by various movie studios, against Australian ISP iiNet for failing to wave a magic wand and wipe out piracy. Apparently, the reason the studios thought they had a slam dunk case was because they hired an "investigator" who signed up with iiNet's service, purposely shared movies, and then had the studios complain to see if iiNet would cut him off. Since it did not, the studios claim that iiNet knew about piracy and did nothing about it. Leaving aside the point that it wasn't actually copyright infringement in the case of the investigator, since he was authorized to distribute the content, and the takedown notice would likely be a false notification, iiNet's response (which we mentioned when the case first came out) seems to still be dead on:They send us a list of IP addresses and say 'this IP address was involved in a breach on this date'. We look at that say 'well what do you want us to do with this? We can't release the person's details to you on the basis of an allegation and we can't go and kick the customer off on the basis of an allegation from someone else'. So we say 'you are alleging the person has broken the law; we're passing it to the police. Let them deal with it'.So, iiNet did take appropriate action. It alerted the police that a company felt laws were being broken. That seems like it should be the extent of any ISP's engagement when sent such flimsy evidence.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: australia, copyright, isp, movie studios
Companies: iinet
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
.....how did you get this job again?
They need to evolve with the changing market. If their business model can not compete then my friend you should go out of business. its the circle of life, from the ashes(prior employees) of your company rises a newer stronger one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: .....how did you get this job again?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: .....how did you get this job again?
When the polluticians are in the pockets of the entertainment industry, it's quite easy. Trim a law here, get rid of a right there and stack the deck in the **AA's favor, and there you have it. hmmm, perhaps I should patent that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Banks sue highway dept for failure to stop bandits escape via roads.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Police?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Police?
I would speculate that it is because very few people these days have the common sense to realize who is to blame for something. They just point the finger anywhere they can.
Or it could be a complete and utter lack of anything resembling intelligence. That theory is backed up somewhat by their lack of and unwillingness to adapt to the markets these days.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
instant classic.
that is what i call FROM THE IN YOUR FACE DEPT,
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
go after the small guys
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If only people did recognise that the ISP responsibility argument is as stupid as those other examples... Anyway, iiNet did take the correct action. They got a valid response from the ISP. They are not legal authorities and not police. They should not be taking action based on unfounded allegations, especially on evidence as flimsy and easily faked as an IP address. Pass the information on to the correct authorities, let them deal with it if a crime has indeed been committed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sort of like...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ISP response
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]