Ding Dong, COPA Is Dead

from the dead,-dead,-dead dept

Wed, Jan 21st 2009 2:03pm — Mike Masnick

The federal government has been trying to pass a law to "protect the children" online for ages. First there was the CDA, the Communications Decency Act, which was struck down as unconstitutional. Then, there was COPA -- the Child Online Protection Act. It tried to be more narrow... but was still a very questionable law, with rather vague wording. It bounced around the courts for years, including hitting the Supreme Court twice -- which sent it back to lower courts both times. Last summer, the appeals court knocked it down again, and today the Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal... meaning that COPA is about as dead as can be. This is definitely a big win for free speech online.

But, of course, just as COPA followed the CDA, have no fear that politicians looking for headlines and photo ops about how they "protect the children" are working hard on new legislation -- such as DOPA -- the Deleting Online Predators Act -- and will continue to push the boundaries of what sort of speech is allowed online. All this really does is waste taxpayer money on unconstitutional attempts to restrict free speech. And, for what? Recent studies have shown time and time again that the threat to children online is relatively small compared to the hype -- and the best response is educating children, rather than restricting speech for all. Somehow, though, I doubt politicians will recognize that any time soon -- especially when lobbyists for companies that sell filtering tools keep beating down their doors with stories of the horrors of online content.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: appeals court, cda, copa, dopa, first amendment, free speech, supreme court

13 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

:Lobo Santo, 21 Jan 2009 @ 2:22pm

Idiota
Indecent
Denizens
I
O
Terrorists
Act
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- :Lobo Santo, 21 Jan 2009 @ 2:22pm
  
  Re: Idiota
  Crap! Stupid enter key... maybe somebody else can do better.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
James, 21 Jan 2009 @ 2:39pm

Morans
When our illustrious congress gets their head out of their ass and cures our real problems.. then I might be willing to listen to morality laws.

Until then.....PARENTS....keep your ****ing kids off the net if you're so worried.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Jan 2009 @ 2:59pm

Parental controls, every browser has it and so do most operating systems. Use them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 21 Jan 2009 @ 3:15pm
  
  Re:
  In addition to measures like browser filtering and such, a very effective tactic is to simply put the computer in a high traffic area of your home, such as the living room. Password protect it and designate times your children can use the computer. It's not that hard.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
joe, 21 Jan 2009 @ 3:26pm

Child predators are in schools and churches. I think kids are a lot safer online than in either of those places.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- William, 21 Jan 2009 @ 10:04pm
  
  Re:
  I think sterotyping where they may not be correct no matter where you state. I've read somewhere (so not necessarily true) that most kids that are molested or violated are done by those that they know, not by random strangers. So if thats true then schools, churches, online, whatever. It's all safer then with a step-dad/mom or with family friends.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Free Speech, 21 Jan 2009 @ 3:29pm

Hoooooooray!!!!!
It's about fucking time!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Aidantheawesome, 21 Jan 2009 @ 4:52pm

RE: Ding Dong, COPA Is Dead
Quote: joe "Child predators are in schools and churches. I think kids are a lot safer online than in either of those places."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Alex, 21 Jan 2009 @ 5:22pm

Good
I think this is a good thing. It shows that our government at least semi-cares about anti-censorship ideals. It's the parents responsibility to censor based on the families morals.

Glad to hear it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
babarum, 21 Jan 2009 @ 9:26pm

Unfortunately in the
current political climate, wasting taxpayer money is not an issue any more. In addition, compared to other wastes, these issues going through the courts and the money it wastes it miniscule.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Neverhood, 22 Jan 2009 @ 4:07am

Protect the children!
I love these laws that supposedly protects the children, but has a whole other purpose in reality, be it a politicians ego or otherwise.

Why haven't the RIAA proposed a law yet to ban all competition in their marked, and set up a mandatory tax to cover executives cocaine usage? You know, "for the children".

Hehe, "DOPA -- the Deleting Online Predators Act" sounds like a sentence made up by a soccer-mom who just finished reading a Computer-lingo-for-dummies book.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
lindsay, 22 Jan 2009 @ 8:40am

Porn? Harmful? No, it's not.
Porn is not nor has ever been "harmful" to anyone... those insignificant, belittled, lesser section of society dubbed as "minors" included.

Why? Because they're gonna find out about porn eventually they might as well start young. And hey unless they're being FORCED to do something... there is no "harm" of any kind.

"EGAD! I did NOT want to see that" *click* and window closes or they can press the backspace button to if they want.

See, that wasn't so hard.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]