Bell Canada Caught Lying In Advertisements... Continues Advertising Because It Doesn't Believe Ad Review Group
from the hear-no-evil... dept
Bell Canada is taking an interesting approach to being called out for lying in its ads to consumers concerning network performance: it's simply ignoring the whole thing. Advertising Standards Canada (ASC) found that Bell Canada was being quite misleading in claiming that Bell Canada was the "fastest network across North America." Now, there may be different ways to judge the speed of broadband offered on a network, and you would think that a company would respond with some data to support its side. Bell Canada, on the other hand, has said that it simply doesn't recognize ASC as a legitimate organization, and therefore, it can go about its business and advertising.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: advertising, truth in advertising
Companies: bell canada
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
It Happens...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
umm..... ok
"Na-uh!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
must be his new job
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
You're kind of oversensitive eh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
BTW AC, I got a kick out of it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
but what and they do
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
who has better experience.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They know full well
They do not care.
I recall a news item some time ago where a company was in court for something and attempted to declare its right to free speech, like it was to be considered on par with a human. I do not recall the outcome .....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's Bell
If this was an American company, there would be monopoly and antitrust lawsuits galore.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bell Service [Internet DSL]
Bell wanted to charge us $55.00 + taxes to come and clean the terminal block contacts in this apt.bldg. I used to install tel equipment, and if the contacts were not clean, then voice and DSL would always be a problem.
Bell lost over $300.00 per month of business from us, because of this silly charge! Bell will never be any different until there is a wholesale change of the old Bell managers and execs, IMHO.
Rogers service is great and is as promised!
Bye, bye, Bell! And go clean your public pay 'phone once a year would be great too!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bell Service [Internet DSL]
I admit that's interesting. Must be some old screw down terminal because if it's punch down one pair of corroded pins would mean far more of them there. If the it's BIX the problem would be worse. (Yes, I'm familiar with telecom.)
Still, it strikes me that Bell would be much better off to clean the entire problem block and eat the cost for the simple reason that they'd retain customers. I guess not. Doesn't take long on punch down, either. (There's even simple ways to get early corrosion out of BIX though if it's advanced it's impossible. I'd be more concerned about how it got there in the first place.) For an R15 block about 2 minutes a pair.
I guess in Ontario Bell doesn't face as aggressive a competitor as Shaw vs Telus in the West. (To say that Rogers was hated out here is a serious understatement.) So both Shaw and Telus here go out of their way to clean up minor irritants like this.
As for Bell being the fastest broadband available in its service area I'd take that with a huge grain of salt. Every delivery system has it's pluses and minuses right down to the capacity of twisted pair vs cable. Being the fastest in downtown Toronto, again a doubtful claim, doesn't interest me if I want high speed in Wawa.
Oh, and pay stations aren't cleaned because Telcos lose money on them. Lots of it, I'm afraid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bell who?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Does Mike Masnick know how to read?
And the commenters are as clueless.....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How could anyone else be faster... Bell controls the main lines and has said it does regulate the bandwidth... so.... if you control the speed for everyone else you can always guarantee you are faster.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bell
lets be honest on something... all external GWI's are equiped with let's say 1 or 2 100MB net card... standard... and inside a GWI's, you can have arround 2000 client for highspeed. if all 2000 are connected at the same time... they will be dirrected to those 2 network cards.... now make the count!
as a matter of facts, Bell systems, never guarante their speed. they allways says that IF you are under 4 KM of cables between you and the C.O. you are guaranted to have a connection, outside the 4 KM of cable, you are treaded as best effort support.
Bell is loaning their equipment to other companys... behind the wires, if other companies are using difefrent technologies, yes they can become faster than Bell, BUT still, if these cpompanies are using Bell infrastructure, they still are limited of 4 KM of wires before having a signal loss...
so in my opinion, even tho i could had a bell highspeed (well, suposed to be highspeed) at half price, due to me working at CGI, i ALWAYS been with VIDEOTRON. CABLE POWER!!! coaxial is the best for signal quality, and the network is sisco based, mac filtered cells, so if someone steel my cable modem, he cant use it...
thats why Bell had to create their connectivity software, they couldnt control who was logged in... so if someone stole the HS modem, in the past, they just had to connect it to a phone line somewhere else, just praying that the GWI's had network card in it... and BOOM, internet access free... isnt it AMAZING! i love uncle TOM (tete a claques)
and im not talking about internet technical support of Bell...
the main trouble, is Bell relied too long on their current equipment... regular RJ11 Cables are outdated... their old equipment is failling, there is not much upgradability for better speed, so they need a bigger bandwith, and knowing the current Bell position, they wont do that for a long period of time... resession hit hards on big companies, and videotron stroke hard on bell too, they had to cut a lot of staff, and cgi too had to. so before that bell is gonna change all their infra, they will still use RJ11 for a long time...
they where the only phone companies for too long, and they just sit down on their customers/clients without taking care of them, now that there is other competitors, they have to rethink everything... and lovely, they do it by sending support outside to india!
live long and prosper VIDEOTRON...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Canada has its Corporate embarassements too!
Can't wait for the expiration of my contract. Bye Bye...dish, modum and ringer. An over-priced package of false pretenses.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
bell incompatance and theivery
[ link to this | view in chronology ]