Dear ISPs: When Launching Value Added Services, How About Actually Adding Value?
from the just-a-suggestion dept
At the beginning of January, I thought it was amusing that Verizon was launching its own backup service for a stunning $31/month (with a limit of 50GB of backup storage). That seemed fairly ridiculous, given that you could get an unlimited backup service from Carbonite or Mozy for $5/month, or using JungleDisk with Amazon's S3 for exceptionally low prices as well (depending on how much you use -- but 50GB comes in at way less than $31). Now comes the news that Comcast is also launching its own backup service, with a few different price points, but starting at $5/month for only 10GB and going up from there. It's not a bad service to offer -- and, surely, Verizon and Comcast see these as ways to lock in consumers, since it now has possession of their backup data -- but it seems quite odd that these companies would offer "value added services" where the prices are more expensive than rolling your own, which doesn't come with the lock-in. And, as noted, with Comcast, using the service counts against their new broadband caps, so there isn't even a benefit there. These ISPs seem to be missing the point of these value added services. If you want to get people to use them, they should actually add value.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: backup, isps
Companies: carbonite, comcast, jungledisk, mozy, verizon
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
For the techno-illiterate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: For the techno-illiterate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: For the techno-illiterate
There are many alternatives which would cost much less and not put your data in the hands of those who are not to be trusted.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: For the techno-illiterate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: For the techno-illiterate
When you're paying for a data backup service you're paying for a service with various failsafes. Such a service would have redundant disks, possibly an additional backup (on magnetic tape), and data security. The backup data is most likely encrypted. No need to worry about someone just stealing your external hard drive and poking through your files.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: For the techno-illiterate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: For the techno-illiterate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: For the techno-illiterate
I guess it's so they don't get branded as being anti-competitive (offering preferential treatment to their own service), but it's not like that stops them from doing the same with their VOIP or video-on-demand services. *eyeroll*
Depending on the frequency and size of your backups, you could hit that 250GB limit pretty darn quickly....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
rolling your own...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just Asking ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Even Microsoft Gives Some for Free
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Comcast vs. Verizon
End of line.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Comcast!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Overkill?
Burn a DVD (or 12) with your "important" data.
Who really has 1TB of "critical" data at home?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
*facepalm*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As usual...
Yes, it IS cheaper to handle your own backups, or to use a different service. Verizon KNOWS this.
But they also know something that the typical techie tends to forget: MOST PEOPLE DON'T KNOW ANY BETTER.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
value pricing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sell consumers unfiltered, uncapped fiber-to-home at a reasonable price.
That is all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
What he said.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The suspense would kill me...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
and do we really
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Backup
AND, it is free.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Beware of Carbonite
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Different values to add
Of course, in many cases you can fix it yourself - or hire some local guy to do the same work for much less.
Still, people buy the service. Why? Because it's simple, convenient, looks trustworthy - and when there's a problem with the phone, it's nice to know that you only need to call the phone company and they'll fix it; you don't have to go search for a local fix-it guy.
Is it "worth it"? That's something that each consumer should decide for himself! For the typical reader of this list, who can probably fix most problems himself, certainly not. For a non-mechanical 75-year-old retiree who depends on his phone service - quite likely.
There are many people who can't "roll their own" backup. I have no problem with ISP's offering such a service. I don't even have a problem with them asking "exorbitant" rates! It's the market that's supposed to determine the *appropriate* costs for things.
That's not to say there can't be problems here. Is Verizon's advertising fraudulent or misleading? Are they abusing their near-monopoly position to gain advantages? (If, for example, the data cap did *not* apply to backups to their servers, I'd say that was an abuse.) Are they charging the advertising and marketing costs for this non-regulated service against their regulated services? All of these things need to be watched for dealt with. Absent that, if you believe in the market - go out there and sell a competing product! (Oh, you think you don't have enough money to get started? How about a service helping people who find "roll your own" too difficult? The world probably doesn't need more backup services - but it certainly has room for easier to use ones!)
-- Jerry
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mozy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]