Details On The FTC's DRM Workshop
from the don't-miss-it dept
At the beginning of January we noted -- with some amount of surprise -- that it appeared that the FTC was preparing a workshop on DRM. When I was in Washington, DC recently, I had the chance to meet some of the folks putting that workshop together, and now they've sent over a more detailed list of topics up for discussion at the session, and it does seem like a pretty good list -- covering pretty much the entire range of questions concerning DRM, specifically from a consumer perspective. It's definitely an encouraging sign that folks at the FTC are recognizing that DRM can be used to do harm, rather than just (as the industry would have you believe) to "open up new business models."
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: drm, ftc, protection
Companies: ftc
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
That's it. The one and only purpose of DRM is to restrict what a person can do. Stop trying to restrict those who have actually paid good money for what is meant to be indefinite usage, and most people will stop seeing it as objectionable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Of course...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
only.....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Screw it, you know what it is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DRM is GOOD
What bollocks.
Enlighted yourself with my previous comment here:
http://www.techdirt.com/article.php?sid=20090123/0742383503#c158
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: DRM is GOOD
Meanwhile, we can at least hope that things won't get worse from this, we'll see anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: DRM is GOOD
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: DRM is GOOD
DRM is like the time-honored accident of picking up a tranny hooker. Things look fine in low light, and you think your getting a 30% off deal, but once you get it home, you find it just doesn't work quite right with anything you got. So you toss it out and just wished you wouldn't have been so foolish.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: DRM is GOOD
So, if you install DRM on to your product, you don't get that money. Explain how this is "good" for anyone except the makers of non-DRMed goods, who do get my money instead?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: DRM is GOOD
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Missing Topic
-DOES IT WORK?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: DRM is GOOD
Reason this: There are thousands of consumers who have been burned by DRM, in my case, DRM on cellphone ringtones. My daughter was dismayed that she couldn't move her ringtones from her old cellphone to her new one because of DRM.
This DRM was put in place to keep 'consumers' from buying one ringtone and sharing it amongst their friends, but in this case prevented a LAWFUL use.
My solution? I went and downloaded the songs, cut them up into clips and put them on her new phone. I had to hack around the DRM on the new phone to get it to recognize the clips as ringtones as well.
Does that sound fair to you? It probably would sound fair to the Voice of Reason whose object is to get customers to pay for the same thing over and over again.
IT DOES NOT sound fair to a customer who has to buy the same thing over and over again.
I saved $60.00 and got a lesson about how in bed the cell-phone companies are with the Industry.
Final words? Take your reasoning and shove it where the sun don't shine.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: DRM is GOOD
Exactly right. Well done skyrider. Being an infinite good it can be charged for over and over again! Remember that I explained that the most money must be made in the shortest possible time by whatever means possible. This is right and proper, as you know. Period.
"IT DOES NOT sound fair to a customer who has to buy the same thing over and over again."
The consumer's views are irrelevant. The rights holders know best. Even the artist that created the content doesn't know squat if they don't still hold the rights, remember.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DRM should have managed "responsibilities" - equitably
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Errata
keyed content like fairplay & "drm free" still associate formatting with a key ... uniqueness, receipts, accounting, double entry accounting matter
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]