More People Realizing Broadband Stimulus Is Targeting The Wrong Problem
from the competition,-competition,-competition dept
We've been worried about the details of the broadband stimulus bill, since it has looked mostly like a way to give money to incumbent telcos, rather than to actually stimulate any broadband. Obama advisor Blair Levin insisted this was just part I, and was more about creating jobs than tackling the broadband problem, but it looks like more folks are getting worried, as well. Scott Bradner points out the obvious at Network World: the broadband stimulus package seems focused on getting broadband to people who aren't that interested in broadband, more than it's about improving broadband for those who do want it.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: broadband, broadband policy, stimulus
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Broadband
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Broadband
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Short sighted
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Short sighted
Funny that you call it arrogant. I wrote the post, and my DSL line is capped at 768kbps. But do you see me demanding a gov't handout to increase broadband here? No. I want competition in the marketplace so that it will push companies to actually provide better broadband.
The news agency that supposedly did the poll asking people in rural areas whether or not they wanted broadband was rigged as most people know. It was not explained to those that don't have it what the advantages where.
It was done by the Pew and American Life Project -- a rather respected group, rather than "a news agency."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Short sighted
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They must not want it, or something.
Not just a question of ignorance or of a rural culture that doesn't value connectivity. Its just that everyone who absolutely needs broadband has been forced to move to an area that has it.
And there are LOTS of people that would like to relocate to rural areas but can never consider it. When looking for a house existing broadband service was a top consideration given to our realtor. I have to live where the connectivity is, so guys like me aren't there when the survey folks come by.
This more or less exactly mirrors the surveys that the power companies did when they were told by the government to roll out power to the Tenessee Valley during the great depression. "Nobody there wants it - if they did they moved to the city."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Deja Vu ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If they want
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Try it. You'll like it.
One other thing that is holding back broadband in some cases is the RIAA. I know two families who won't get broadband because they are afraid of the RIAA. One of the families doesn't even have kids.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Let's call it what it is...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Let's call it what it is...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Post is off-track
Competition is not going to get faster internet out to him because the population density is too low to ever justify the infrastructure. While I agree that competition is extremely important to improving the existing services, I don't know what you really expect. A government bill cannot just create competition out of thin air. What it can do use fund a sort of "last mile" requirement for broadband. Spending the money to improve broadband where it already exists is a bit ridiculous when there are plenty of people who can't get it at all. And to say that they don't want it is both arrogant and ignorant. Clearly, you don't live in an area where you have close contact with people to whom broadband is unavailable. All of them that I know complain plenty.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Post is off-track
Your dad has chosen to live where he lives. That's his choice and he must deal with the consequences.
A Government bill cannot create competition, the market does that just fine, what a government bill can do is remove the restrictions that are in place preventing competition and/or prevent actions that block competition.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Plenty of people would like better internet access
These people actually want better connections, but they don't have much choice in the matter. They pay exhorbitant prices for crappy internet connections and think that's normal. Then they get terrible service from their ISP diagnosing their problems. This is quite a turnoff for them - they are used to people waiting hand and foot for them and the horridly rude reps and terrible service they provide is just ridiculous.
I know that there's a little bias from the sense that anyone who is trying to use our service already has something for an internet connection or is at least familiar with it, but...I've never had a phone call where someone had dial-up and found out that our service required broadband...and then said anything to the effect that they didn't want it...if anything it was, "Well, we can't get anything else out here..."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]