Finland Certifies Election, Despite 2% Of Votes Lost Due To Computer Issues
from the what's-1%-here-or-there? dept
In the latest sad saga concerning e-voting mishaps, it appears that Finland's courts have agreed to certify a recent election, despite approximately 2% of the votes not being counted (found via Slashdot). Also, there were additional problems as it's been discovered that despite the requirement for an "anonymous election" the voting software stored identifying information, along with how each voter voted. Oops. Once again, we're left wondering why various governments keep trusting such questionable equipment?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Except a lot of them just don't care. As long as they've got a party to go to this weekend, they're happy. I'm surprised at the number of commenters over on slashdot that see nothing wrong with these kind of election results.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Finland's elections
Maybe the uncounted votes would have changed the local councils by one person but very probably would not have affected the seats for the parties.
Also I think the equipment is not the only thing to blame. People can't use them!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Finland's elections @ Leena
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
a reason why governments might like e-voting
this may be a tin-foil hat thought but
... perhaps because they know something we don't about how they might make use of the equipment and its vagaries for their own ends?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Naa, that's my suspicion too - really. How can a company that makes ATM's that almost never, ever miscount cash - not be able to count votes properly? At least in a lot of cases, that is true.
It seems that the system required the voter to insert a smart card to identify the voter, type in their selected candidate number, then press "ok", check the candidate details on the screen, and then press "ok" again. Some voters did not press "ok" for the second time, but instead removed their smart card from the voting terminal prematurely, causing their ballots not to be cast.
On an ATM for instance - on the last part; it will ask you to confirm too - but it's nice and clear.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Look at the debacle that happened in Minnesota. How many paper ballots did they find under someone's seat? How long did it take to get that election settled? (oh, that's right, it still isn't)
On a national note, I was happy to see Obama nominate a republican for his cabinet. I guess in 3 weeks, we will learn that Republicans don't pay their taxes either.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]