Court Says It's Not Online Gambling If You Can Renege On A Bet
from the hello-loophole dept
The US has always had this odd hatred for online gambling -- but no state has been more aggressive about the issue than Washington state -- even to the point of threatening people with arrests for even talking about online gambling. So, you can imagine that the state didn't look too favorably on the launch of a person-to-person "wager" site called Betcha.com which claimed it had found a nice loophole that made it legal: you could renege on your bet. Yes, if you lost a wager, you could click a button saying "I refuse to pay." The catch, of course, was that the site had a rating system, and if you reneged, it was likely to harm your rating, and others might refuse to bet against you. Betcha claimed that the presence of the renege button meant that it wasn't actually gambling, because you never actually had to bet any money.The state of Washington not only disagreed, it took a month or so until state authorities raided the company, arrested its founders and seized its computers. That seems pretty extreme for what does seem to be a rather open question in the law. And, in fact, a state appeals court found that the Betcha founder is right: the presence of the renege button means that the site is not a gambling site:
"Accordingly, there is nothing risked, which is the essence of both the common law and statutory definition of 'gambling.'"Of course, that doesn't mean Betcha is coming back into existence. Since its founder (who has a law degree and had carefully researched gambling laws to make sure the loophole was legit) was arrested, thrown in jail, extradited to Louisiana, charged (in Louisiana) with gambling-related felonies finally forcing him to negotiate a plea bargain, dropping the charges if he agreed to certain conditions. With that experience in mind, restarting the site and risking it happening again just doesn't seem that appealing.
So, way to go Washington State -- you tossed a guy in jail for a completely legal web business.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: gambling, online gambling, renege, wagering, washington
Companies: betcha
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Betcha
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Betcha
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
be back with cash
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: be back with cash
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Legalize it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Legalize it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Washington
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Washington
The tribal casinos here in Washington are pretty close to what you'd see in my home town of Reno NV (not near what you'd see in Vegas though).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Washington
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cute
Didn't work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cute
I don't know about you, but stories like this are scary as hell. They had no just cause for arresting him and they went ahead and did it anyway. That's not acceptable by any stretch of the imagination.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cute
Now I don't necessarily agree that gambling should be illegal as long as the society is willing to help those who get addicted and lose everything (which in most cases the government is not) but I do agree that some guy using loopholes to get around the law is still a jerk.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cute
No, it was clearly a violation of neither the spirit nor the letter of the law. However, those who claim otherwise are clearly being dishonest.
Now I don't necessarily agree that gambling should be illegal as long as the society is willing to help those who get addicted and lose everything...
Just exactly how are you going to "lose everything" on a bet that you don't have to pay? Again, such a claim seems to be somewhat dishonest.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cute
If the law says that gambling is illegal, and defines gambling as interactions that meet a set of criteria, then that is the law. Interactions that do not meet that criteria are not covered under law, and should be legal. It should not be the state's prerogative to harass you for their failure to craft laws that outlaw behavior that they feel to be undesirable.
These issues would not be a problem if states did not constantly attempt to criminalize actions that their people want to engage in, that result in no victimization.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Muahahaha
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You're right, you're not understanding the criminal justice system. Whether you are guilty or innocent often makes less difference than how much money you have. This guy probably didn't have enough money to fight. Without money you can either lay down and beg them not to hurt you too badly (plea bargain) or commit "suicide" by standing up and maintaining your innocence. Your choice. Is this a great country or what?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
indian casinos
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm surprised this obvious untruth made it into a court document.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Washington State
God, do I ever hate this state.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
explanation
But you see, they don't LIKE it. And that means they can do pretty much whatever they want. We used to live in a nation of laws and now live in a nation chock full of laws to be manipulated against you in event of personal or moral disagreement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
gambling
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
quesiton?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
poker-du
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
my opion is needed
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Government
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hire him instead
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
game poker online
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
poker357
[ link to this | view in chronology ]