TV Stations Say Thanks, But No Thanks To Analog Switch Delay
from the anarchy-on-the-airwaves! dept
As was widely expected, Congress voted last week to delay the switch-off of analog TV signals, sort of. It did move the hard deadline of February 17 until June 12, but it is also allowing TV stations to switch off their analog broadcasts any time before then, and many stations say they'll do so as soon as they can, beginning next week. Over a third of the nation's TV stations plan to move ahead with the switch, as planned, eager to shed the additional cost of broadcasting both in digital and in analog. So instead of a hard deadline, some stations will drop off of the analog air next week, others not until June, and others somewhere in between -- a situation that hardly seems easier to understand for the confused and lost among us that the delay was supposed to help. Furthermore, how does this sort of staggered transition help sort out the converter box coupon mess?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: confusion, congress, delay, digital tv
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
noses up boys
Congress - "Hey you guys can wait if you want. We'll spend
time deciding to give you guys some room. And also make us look concerned."
The Market - "Screw that, this is happening as planned."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
i meant...basically playing out
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
TV Stations Say Thanks, But No Thanks To Analog Switch Delay
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: TV Stations Say Thanks, But No Thanks To Analog Switch Delay
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The FCC is genius
At least we get to see exactly how many people still have problems when it happens. And maybe this will still push people to finally get off their asses and make the switch.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Phhttt...
Our local market is covered by stations for each of the major networks, pbs, and a couple smaller networks. None, and I mean NONE, of those stations have anywhere near the same coverage area with their digital signal as their analog. Hell, even their analog signals don't cover everyone. I grew up 35 miles from where I live, atop a hill at that, and we had to have a 45ft tower to recieve more than one station clear enough to watch. You have to go another 35 miles or more before you start picking up the more powerful stations in the next nearest market.
Cable helps a small percentage of those, but in rural areas it goes down often during incliment weather. It only takes one fallen tree to cut out the signal to thousands in storm. Satellite helps a few more, but it goes out in bad weather when it's needed most, it requires line of sight that doesn't work reliably in heavily wooded areas. Not only that, but both of these cost money that many rural customers can't afford, and with satellite you're stuck paying extra for "local" channels and you're forced to take the channels that the satellite company determines are your local channels - which for fringe users may not carry the stations that truly cover your news and weather.
Can this be addressed by increasing power output on digital? Yes. Will it? Probably, eventually. Will large numbers of people lose access to needed news and weather for extended periods while this happens? I'd bet on it.
On the coupon mess... I'm waiting for news that the system has been gamed. Someone has bought or stolen the list of consumers who received coupons and didn't redeem them, or they just guessed or otherwise forged the needed paperwork, and they've been repaid huge sums by our government for faked sales. They will have have long past absconded with the money before the fraud is detected... and it'll probably turn out that a 5yr old could have looked at the paperwork and determined something was wrong.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Phhttt...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Phhttt...
I should know, most of our region just suffered an ice storm. We were without power for a week, as were tens of thousands, with temps so cold that the toilet water was freezing. Others still don't have power after more than two weeks. All we had was an AM radio and the information largely sucked compared to what we normally get on television. The only advantage was the occassional live caller reporting a store where they'd just taken delivery of more heaters, generators, or kerosene.
I rather suspect you haven't listened to AM radio in the past decade and that you don't live anywhere that sees severe storms roll through.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Phhttt...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Phhttt...
Also all that needed info that you claim is only on TV during a storm is available over radio waives usually via regular radio stations or weather radio. I know when I lived in the country and got one TV station in, (our only TV option was satellite and we couldn't afford it) we had two weather radios to get the needed info during storms.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Phhttt...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Phhttt...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Phhttt...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Phhttt...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Phhttt...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Phhttt...
And I'll say this yet again, the very worst that will happen is that some people won't be able to watch broadcast TV. Big fricken deal.
Have you watched broadcast news recently? Please tell me what you've learned from Katie Couric and your local Action 7 News team? And you honestly think we need TV weather broadcasts to tell us when dangerous storms are coming?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Phhttt...
You may live in an area where you can see storms coming for miles. I don't. We have hills. Even on days where thunderstorms have been forecast as likely a storm can hit within minutes of the storm clounds becoming visible. We rural folk have fields we have to work in, not all of us work in factories, office buildings, or homes. We can't sit inside in leisure on a day that it might storm. I've been in the field working, seen the storm clouds over the trees, and not had time to walk to the house 150yds away before I was pelted by hail.
Local tv, with it's radar, let us know where the storms are, how bad, which ones will likely hit and likely miss, where the hail is, what the track of the tornado is, where the lightening is bad, when we need to take cover, how long we can stay out, and so on. Radio rarely does any of that. It's too general or too automated.
Get outta your pond mr fish, you'll learn that a vast number of people have different needs than you do.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Phhttt...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Phhttt...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not all bad
At least those who, incredibly, haven't heard about the switch yet may now realise they need to do something when they start losing some networks. To me, it's preferable to them losing everything in one go on a hard deadline.
On another note, I wonder how the staggered switch off will effect the ratings and consequent advertising rates?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not all bad
Yet you still expect the same coverage as those in more populated areas?
You sound like a big whinning complainer, and if that's the best you argument you have, good luck.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Not all bad
ok, I'll bite on this one (from the perspective of my folks who live in more-rural area than I do). They do not expect the same coverage as those in more populated areas. They expect the same coverage as previously available to them. In this case, this means over-the-air access of the Big-Four networks (ABC/NBC/CBS/FOX, plus the local PBS station). The digital-broadcast coverage map for this area doesn't match today's analog-broadcast coverage map so they basically lose programming through no fault of their own (they have the converter boxes).
second (and this is my opinion)... most broadcast licenses for OTA broadcasters includes some sort of verbiage along the lines of "required by law to operate its station in the 'public interest, convenience and necessity.'" (embedded quote present in cite) So, how is shrinking your coverage area serving the public interest? I understand there is no guarantee in coverage area or level of service.. but let's not be to willing to simply blame the consumer for being frustrated they had 5 stations today and 3 stations tomorrow.
-r
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Not all bad
Like somebody said earlier, if they aren't ready by Feb, then they won't be ready by June.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Not all bad
Next time read.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Not all bad
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not all bad
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Not all bad
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tired of hearing about it
It's even more frustrating when you are viewing DTV and you have to watch them...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How typical...
Government is here to fix all your problems! Even the ones it creates!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
TV Stations Say Thanks, But No Thanks To Analog Switch Delay
Thom; I don't see more time solving your issue. The US has one of the worst TV broadcast systems in the world, but only because it was the first. Finally some sort of upgrade to improve the system and we're hollering about an inconvenience. Rural areas will ALWAYS have that issue. Hell, I live in the San Fernando Valley, in a rural area. I look down on 1.6 MILLION people, and I don't have cable or DSL available to me. We had to opt for satellite TV and satellite Internet. Our "secondary" TV's not on Sat we got the converter boxes for. A $10 antenna at Target and *poof* we were in business with now about 60 channels in place of the 20 we had, and of those 20, only about 12 were watchable due to poor quality. Now, all are clear as a bell. PEOPLE NEED TO START TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEMSELVES.. Get off your Ass, get the converter, hook it up and shut up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Lazy Unwashed Masses
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The reason is simple: It's already been budgeted for the 17th.
To delay the switch means to allocate money that does not exist, or to reallocate money from somewhere else. So unless the broadcaster has money laying around to burn, they'll make the switch.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I have an idea, lets give the government more power
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think that this 'mess' in entirely government created. It is only because of government interference that converter boxes cost $50 - $60. If it weren't for the $40 coupon, these boxes would be available for $10 and up. Essentially the end cost to the consumer is the same, but the government has created a situation where consumers are dependent on government handouts to get the product. I would bet money that if the government would just let the coupon program die out, then after the products which are currently in the pipeline get sold, you would see the price of converter boxes drop by $40. However, in that case the government would not get the credit for 'helping' out consumers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And they want our Government to manage our health care??
They can't even manage a $40 coupon. Scary.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Waiting for the slackers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
not for the broadcasters
The FCC and congress severely underestimated how many homes might be effected. They also didn't account for how many cable customers would be duped into getting a coupon and a box that they didn't even need.
The problem is that the consumer is beyond broke, and no one in government wants to give the appearance of forcing the consumer to spend.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And this is important enough to budget congresses time why?
I think their time would better be put to use dealing with creating jobs.
I know here in Michigan, a lot of us would just be happy to have a job to afford the TV or converter box to watch these stations.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: And this is important enough to budget congresses time why?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: And this is important enough to budget congresses time why?
Can anyone explain why something as trivial as discussing a delay over this issue that will only affect maybe 6% of a population?
I mean if you have not heard about the transition yet, you do not watch enough TV to be concerned about it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Scared
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Scared
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Scared
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They can't even manage a $40 coupon. Scary.
I have found that few; if any, of the people that support 'Government Health Care' have ever had to use Medicaid or Medicare or have ever been to a government run clinic.
Now; I'm not bashing the doctors, they have some very fine medical professionals in the system. But, the 'system' itself sucks and sucks bad. Long waits; insistence on doing the 'cheapest' medical tests first - even if there is a suspicion that the more expensive one will provide an answer faster. Cold, uncaring administration staff, waiting rooms packed with out of control children, not much flexibility on appointment times.. I could go on.
I've been there, done that; and private insurance, with all of it's greed is still quite a step up from Government care.
Government care will remove just about any incentive for competition because you lower the bar to the lowest common denominator.
I guess the saying stands true: "You get what you pay for."
There's a reason economies flourish under a free-market system and falter badly under a socialist system. The only reason some socialist economies even do marginally well is because they are latching onto the back of free-market systems. China and the US are fantastic examples of just that - heck, keep it even closer and just compare China's mainland with Taiwan.
If history isn't enough to convince people, I can't say anything is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If it is the case that they will (for a small time window), not get the same digital coverage as had under analog coverage, then they need to bring it to the attention of local government, state government, and federal government officials. I'm not saying spend a lot of time on it.
I'm saying go to the local library, and fire off three e-mails (they do have libraries right, and cars to drive to them in?). The point is, it doesn't take a lot of effort. Also a lot of people are putting the blame on government, when they are completely uninvolved in their own elderly, poor person's life. Instead of helping our fellow human (your parents for example only), we hide behind it being the "government's" job. Should the government have to send someone out to hook up the converter box? Is it really their fault? The point is, you have to draw the line somewhere. Complaining only gets you so far. Take action, or tough luck. That's how life always has, and always will be.End rant.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lazy...
And to all the rural folks arguing their needs- what difference does it make? The four-month delay just delays the inevitable, and doesn't help your situation at all.
One thing to keep in mind- many stations will be operating at a reduced signal strength until the final cutoff date, because they can't operate at full power at their assigned frequency until then. So- you might have less trouble once the actual cutoff happens.
The problem now is- since a lot of stations are switching before the "real" cutoff time- their coverage area will be reduced until June. So- potentially the whiners that wanted a delay screwed themselves for four months.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I am REALLY Annoyed
There are 5 channels available in our area. CBS and FOX both have digital signals I can receive. NBC and ABC do not, as there are hills blocking the signal. They do have an alternative tower that wouyld be able to get a signbal to me, but it is being used for their analog signal - and now it will continue to be used until June for that analog signal.
Where is my anlaog to digital convertor box? Oh, they don't exist - screw me!
F U Congress!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
@Rick: Shut up. You're a completely foolish if you actually bought a digital set without access to cable. Just my opinion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Everyone here has a better tool
TV and radio are, in general, poor to mediocre at predicting a majority of weather.
I stopped watching tv after I was told by 3 friendly neighborhood weathermen that there was gonna be a light rain; within hours there had been 6 inches of rain, a flash flood, and winds that prevented me from stopping my car from floating into a bridge.
I have since figured out that the internet (which I assume many of you have used before) has access to the same if not better equipment than that of my local weather swami.
I won't be making the switch over to digital. No need.
There is nothing on tv ANYONE requires to live.
Provided you live in an area that isn't riddled with god's love.(tornadoes, hurricanes, floods, deadly winter storms)
If you do live in those areas, not only is that what you get...but the internet could have told you that better than your local news anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Everyone here has a better tool
So you have one of those boat cars, eh! =)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Info on DTV Options
Anyone with a TV that uses rabbit ears or a roof top antenna to get reception and isn’t sure about what to do might want to check out www.comcast.com/dtv. The site has helpful information on all three DTV solutions - signing up for cable, buying a new TV or getting a converter box.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
To make matters worse
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-7A1.pdf
Unless this is an EXTREMELY elaborate hoax, the government is standing in the way of business "for the children" aka stupid people of America. Those that can't be bothered to go get a box or couldn't go out of the way to get internet access. or a weather radio...
I believe that may be a tad out of the governments legitimate reach. If I want to broadcast information I am required by the FCC to get a license...then if they don't like what I am airing they can fine/revoke me.
Telling me I cannot upgrade MY equipment...that my friends is fascism. (or totalitarianism, whichever makes the hair on your neck stand up)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Isaac said it well!
Market -- screw you, we're heading ahead with "situation normal"
What is there to loose anyway -- a little less news coverage on how bad our lives are supposed to be. Good grief.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
govt will never fix ANYTHING
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Can be bad!!!
I will probably on get 2-3 stations and they aren't even good stations... I'm just waiting to see what happens.. I have an outside antenna and can now get NBC,ABC,CBS, and Fox but may loose those when they go digital.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]