European Parliament Study Finds Video Games Are Good For Kids

from the put-away-your-moral-panic dept

For the past decade or so, the press and certain politicians have been somewhat successful in building a moral panic about video games and the supposed harm they do to children. The problem is that there's almost no evidence that this is true -- and almost all of the evidence that claims this is true doesn't hold up to scrutiny. Often, the moral panic-inducing results are actually either the researcher or (more likely) the press coming up with a conclusion that does not match with the actual study results.

However, in just the last year, we've finally been seeing prominent researchers and politicians start to push back on this notion of video games causing harm. Last year, two Harvard professors came out with a book reviewing all of the research and adding some of their own, all of which showed no evidence that video games made kids violent (in fact, it found that it was the kids who didn't participate in video games that you should be worried about.

Perhaps even more surprising, though, is that some politicians are now pushing back, as well. A study done in the EU Parliament is now noting that video games are actually good for kids, noting that they can help "stimulate learning of facts and skills such as strategic thinking, creativity, cooperation and innovative thinking, which are important skills in the information society." The report does, unfortunately, still claim that in some cases violent video games may stimulate violence (though, without much proof), but it's still surprising to see a political report on video games that sees them as being useful.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: eu, eu parliament, kids, studies, video games


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Michael Smith, 12 Feb 2009 @ 5:51pm

    How valid is this report?

    I'm confused. If we are to devalue a part of the study showing the possible correlation between violent games and actual violence due to a lack of proof, should we not assume the entire report followed those same mistakes?

    If the report is accurate, I'm comfortable accepting reality, if that is the case. It would not be a leap of logic to assume violence, through any format, would stimulate at least some violence. The difference lies in proper parenting and communication.

    I am, however, encouraged to see pushback on such an official and political level.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Simon, 12 Feb 2009 @ 6:25pm

    ?If Video Games Are Actually Good For My Kids Then Why Are They Given A Rating?

    So am I to conclude that violent video games are going to be good for my kids? Sounds to me like someone has been very selective in their use of data.
    As to the observations about non-participants, the conclusions drawn about the need to be worried about this group of kids can be applied generally right across every social activity in society, not just to kids who fail to participate in playing video games.
    From personal observations amongst kids I feel you see a polarization of character development, some kids become more anti-social, others become more cooperative due to increased social networking etc.
    Given the increased expression of extreme violence amongst kids these days I fail to see how video games can be a solely positive influence on their growth and development.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 12 Feb 2009 @ 6:51pm

    Its the work of the devil

    Just like rock and roll.
    It will only lead to damnation and depavity.
    It should be banned along with dancing and singing.
    You are all sinnerz

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Danielle, 12 Feb 2009 @ 7:21pm

    Video Games

    Yippee! At last a study that shows I'm not an idiot after all those years spent on my Sega as a child. My kids now enjoy the Nintendo wii and it provided great family time together... yes we all shoot Zombies as a family and are proud of it!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    DracoJJ, 20 Feb 2009 @ 7:12am

    Common sense

    I would hope most people would use common sense as to what games a child should be playing or not be playing. Younger children shouldn't be exposed to a game like F.E.A.R because of its extremely violent scenes, but there is nothing wrong with a child playing a game like, Leap Frog Reader, or Math Blaster, which are in fact designed to help teach children better learning skills.

    As a kid gets older and more understanding on how the world works why not allow them to play more broad games, again though keeping them away form the very violent games, but not being to strict on the games that the child can play.

    and as the child hits teen they should be able to tell the difference between reality and fiction, and if necessary you should sit your child down and explain to them the difference so that they can play the slightly more violent games and not be in any danger.

    and of course finally once the child reaches the ages of 17 or 18 then obviously they should be allowed to make their own decisions on the games they play, I would even say a 16 year old or 15 could as well. That particular age group has reasoning abilities far better than a younger child and can use their moral standards that you have set for them to understand that these games are just for fun and nothing more.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    devin, 21 Mar 2009 @ 2:44pm

    lol hate it but get an A!!!!!!!!!!!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Nov 2009 @ 11:54am

    I agree, games are the best. There is one thing though... WOW maniacs... They are not normal. It's not normal to spend an entire day/week/month running between two 'cities' carrying the same items every time. That's retarded. Quit WOW and start playing free games.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.