EU Committee Ignores All The Research; Approves Copyright Extension
from the stealing-from-the-public dept
Who needs evidence when you have bogus emotional appeals? That seems to be the reasoning behind the EU Parliament legal affairs committee's decision to approve a plan to extend performance copyrights from 50 to 95 years. This despite a coalition of intellectual property experts who pointed out that such extension harms innovation and only serves to help the record labels. It also ignored plenty of research on the harm done by copyright extension. There is, once again, simply no good reason to retroactively change the deal that was made between the musicians and the public at the time of creation. This is nothing more than defrauding the public, by going back on a clear deal that was made. And, for what? The money (despite the slick marketing campaign) isn't going to musicians for the most part. It's going directly into the coffers of (you guessed it) the major record labels. None of this appears to have been addressed by the committee -- which seems to have fallen for the "we must keep paying those poor session musicians for a single performance they made 90 years ago" marketing campaign. This still isn't final -- it still needs to be approved by the Council of Ministers, but the fact that it's even gotten this far is troubling.![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I wish it was passed based on emotion, I could live with that and understand it. Unfortunately, the law was passed because the music industry was given the law it bought and paid for.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
There is, once again, simply no good reason to retroactively change the deal that was made between the musicians and the public at the time of creation.
Sure there is, the music industry pays politicians good money for these laws. Now the politician lapdogs must oblige their masters.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He who has the gold makes the rules, after all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Experts? You mean some professors who live solely within the "hallowed halls" of academia?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Innovation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Money its a gas.....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seems some labor is worth more than others.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If you build a house and rent it, instead of selling it, it is possible for you to receive the functional equivalent of a royalty. In fact you might be in a better position since rental contracts are usually for a limited duration, and the rent can be changed at the end of the contract.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not that surprising, but has to pass thru plenary also
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If it passes in plenary, I don't have much faith the Council of Ministers will stop this. Some countries have express reservations, but apparently the bigger countries now support it, so... it will likely be approved there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]