Comedian Smashes Mobile Phone; Fearing 'Joke Stealing'
from the ok,-this-is-going-too-far dept
The concept of stealing jokes seems pretty ridiculous to us. Jokes are something that people pass around, and the real challenge is in how well you tell the joke -- not in the joke itself. Yet, it's no secret that some comedians have been going on tirades about joke stealing recently -- with one comedian in the UK, Lee Hurst, going so far as to smash someone's cameraphone during a show, after he accused the phone's owner of filming him to steal jokes (thanks to everyone that sent this in).Talk about paranoid. It seems equally likely that whoever was filming it just wanted to show some friends. Besides, if you want to "steal" jokes, can't you do so simply by remembering them. Smashing someone's phone isn't going to stop that. Unless they invent one of those science fiction devices that erase short-term memory, no comedian will ever be able to fully stop others from making use of their jokes (and, in that case, I'd bet the comedian wouldn't do too well, since no one remembers his act).
In this case, Hurst plead guilty and paid a fine for destroying the camera... but says he'll do it again. Then he demanded stronger copyright protection over jokes and said he thinks YouTube should be banned:
"I don't regret what I did because the police wouldn't turn up to defend me, would they? It was in anger, but it is like having your tools stolen if your material is taken. We just need the same protection that is afforded to the cinema on copyright theft.... Ban YouTube -- it is the biggest piece of c*** ever."Perhaps he really doesn't like that up-and-coming competing comedians are using YouTube to their advantage, while he's stuck wallowing in the past. It must suck not to be able to compete with upstarts who know how to embrace modern technology, but that's no excuse for getting violent.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: comedians, copyright, jokes, lee hurst, mobile phones
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Hardly surprising
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Copyright culture is becoming a joke
an audience member during a stand-up gig."
...
"Mr Hurst said he had broken the handset at The Stoke pub in Guildford,
Surrey because he was angry that someone might be stealing his material."
Theft of a comedian's material could only occur if he was practising in front of the mirror in the privacy of his own home, and someone had installed a hidden camera.
People passing jokes on to each other by word of mouth is one of the oldest folk traditions. Having a monopoly on the telling of a particular joke may well be lucrative, but it is not ethical. Why must all other comedians be denied a particular joke so that one comedian may enjoy a higher ticket price?
They'll be banning video cameras in cinemas and theatres next.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
whoa!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: whoa!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: whoa!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: whoa!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Imagine that...not only would he feel like he's been robbed, he might even get his ass kicked too...I actually feel sorry for him...not because I agree with him but because he's a bleedin' idiot!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article2068000.ece
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
A year from now, he will be as forgotten as yesterday's lunch.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Copyright Culture
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hurst admits copyright does not cover his material.
So he claims that he was forced to take the law into his own hands. However, as he just admitted, the law is not on his side. He's not protecting his rights. He has none. He's not enforcing any law. There is none.
Exactly why anyone would feel sympathy for this psychopath is beyond me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lee Hurst
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Actually, it's Lee Hurst
Lee Hurst used to be fairly famous in the mid 1990s, having a regular gig on BBC TV's They Think It's All Over, but he quit that show in a huff. He had a few minor shows on regional TV, but is now almost forgotten. Given his attitudes, I can certainly see why.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Clueless
I searched on google just for a bit to see if he had a website or a blog, just to see how much backlash he'd been getting. I didn't find one, but nearly all the links on the first two pages of google's results are about this or his wikipedia entry - which mentions this as well and has a better quote which should go down in history with him. Quoted from WikiPedia:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There's an easy fix for this
Stupidity should not be allowed to prosper.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: There's an easy fix for this
There's where you went wrong. ;-)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Arsticrats?
A real comedian would have been able to spin the situation and made the guy feel like a tool.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Stealing
To the person who mentioned Monty Python, they put their stuff up there so that THEY could actually get credit for it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Stealing
You're absolutely right, a joke writer would receive the exact same protection as someone who wrote a poem or story. However, the idea behind the story or poem is not protected. So even though the author of the Harry Potter books has a copyright covering her books, she does not own the idea of a boy with magical powers.
Thus, if you can tell the joke a different way, you are not violating the joke writer's copyright.
Just to make this clear, ideas cannot be copyrighted.
"There was probably even a sign as you went into the club saying "no video recording allowed"."
You cannot expand copyrights through the use of a sign. Sure the club had a sign. And the owner or agent of the club could have enforced the sign. However, that does not give the performer any rights to enforce the sign through the use of theft and violence.
"How is that different?"
Copyrights protect a work of art. A sign on the wall prohibiting conduct would constitute a contract between the owner and his customers.
"To the person who mentioned Monty Python, they put their stuff up there so that THEY could actually get credit for it."
Actually who were taking credit for Monty Python's material? That's complete nonsense.
The reason I put that link up there was to show what an idiot Hurst is. Hurst claims that Youtube is crap. But yet, Monty Python is using it to make a lot more money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Stealing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Stealing
And what I'm saying, yet again, is that Monty Python's use and success with Youtube proves that if used correctly it is not crap and can make a lot of money for copyright holders.
All of which proves my point that Hurst is an idiot.
Look at it this way, if you're a copyright holder, you can either spend the rest of your life and a lot of money on attorney fees fighting your fans (literally in this instance) who put stuff on youtube, or you can embrace it and find ways to make money off of it. Like what Monty Python did.
If you and Hurst honestly believe that physically and legally attacking your fans is the best way to build a fan base and earn money as an entertainer, you're both idiots.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Stealing
Go ahead. People will quickly realize that you copied it from here, and it will destroy your reputation and credibility, while boosting ours.
That would be great.
Please. Go ahead.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Stealing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Stealing
Yes. I have that much confidence. If you do a better job with my content, then it will only provide more incentives for me to do a better job.
But, on the whole, I trust my readers to be relatively smart. They can figure out that you are lying when you claim my content as yours, and your reputation will be severely damaged.
And, while my content may be infinitely copyable, your reputation is a scarce resource that you probably won't want to damage.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Stealing
Techdirt has posted about this on several occasions and has said that they ultimately don't care. If people try to repost techdirt stories as their own, it ends up giving them more traffic from that site once people find out where the articles are coming from. So go ahead repost away. People will find out you stole it from techdirt and call you a thieving b*st*rd and stop coming to your site. Have fun. Most people would rather come by a story honestly if it is available. You trying to draw a parallel between jokes that can't be proved as being original and printed media is pointless and nonfunctional.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Stealing
How the hell is someone going to post a video on youtube of a comedian telling a joke on stage and then take credit for it? "Look at me when I used to do stand-up....before all my plastic surgery."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No it's not
No, if my tools are stolen I don't have them anymore, therefore I can not work. What it's like is saying other people shouldn't be allowed to own the same tools I have so I won't have to compete with them. On second thought that's not a bad idea, from now on only professional mechanics will be allowed to own wrenches.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No it's not
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: No it's not
My guess is the reason he is so upset about this is that he cant create himself and is forced to purchase original material from others.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Sarcasm aside, this is a good thing. It will force comedians to continue to come up with new material and use that instead. For the good comedians, it'll even mean more ticket sales, because they can tour the same places with new material and have more repeat audience members.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Did Bill Cosby settle with the original Fat Albert, street football, dentist or childbirth jokes? Nope, he's been making new comedy all these years. Sure, he still performs his old faves but he sees the comedy in life and doesn't slow down on the creativity drawn from it.
Song writers, authors, poets, etc. need to do the same. Stop treating copyright as a be-all-end-all of money making and start actually working for your keep. We'll respect you more for it to be certain.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Talent
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Talent
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Stealing Jokes
What a knob?!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Stealing Jokes
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not funny. Next time he's in the area, I'll be sure to stay away, just in case I happen to remember one of his jokes - I wouldn't want to offend him.
That and I prefer comedians with a SENSE OF HUMOR.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
See - it doesn't matter. That's what some people don't get. I'll forget why on the specifics soon enough, because it's petty...
But I'll remember that there's a reason to avoid "Lee Hurst".
See, it really doesn't matter what you copyright and don't copyright - what you copy and don't copy... if you don't appeal to consumers or suck - then you don't make a profit.
You could be like many people in history who didn't patent a dang thing and are still much richer than most of us will ever be.
If not for people being able to 'copy' VHS machines, they would have never, ever won out over Beta machines. Beta machines were FULL OF FAIL; because Sony kept such a tight grip on them.
So hoard your content, hoard your ideas - keep them to yourself forever; that's fine - but don't expect anyone else to care about them either.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yeah, that thinking has really hurt Apple.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Steve Martin and Eddie Murphy's current output, it's really shaming Ricky Gervais, you know.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
joke
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Guess
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not surprising
How much trouble do people go through because of piracy? This is exactly the same thing but on a smaller scale.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lost it!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
hmmm Carlin anyone?
Over and over again we see the people who are truly the geniuses of these intellectual property fields never seem to worry too much about IP or others "borrowing" thier ideas . . . I think it says something about the truly creative thinkers of society.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]