How Do You Ban Someone From Posessing A 'Recording Device'?
from the seems-to-rule-out-a-lot... dept
Michael Geist points out that a guy in Canada has been convicted under an anti-camcording law for recording a showing of the movie Dan in Real Life (I'm sure it was big on all the torrent sites). However, what struck me as interesting was the punishment handed out. The guy is on 24 months of probation, has to perform 120 hours of community service, is barred from entering a movie theater or associating with anyone involved in movie piracy. And... he is barred from owning any recording device.That seems a bit broad. After all, most mobile phones these days are recording devices. Any computer is a recording device. An iPod can be a recording device. I can understand the thought process that went into such a ban, but it seems to overreach in its intended impact.
![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: camcording, canada, punishment
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That'll make his life tough for awhile.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just think of all the lost movie revenue now that they've stopped piracy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Forever
No, just during the length of his parole/probation. At least that's how it would work in the USA. Placing those conditions on a person who has served his sentence free and clear would be unconstitutional.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Forever
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Forever
> of the severity of their crime. So, no, not
> just for the length of his parole/probation,
> at least not in the US.
Actually, there are several cases coming up from varous states that challange the constitutionality of many aspects of those lifetime sex offender punishments-- especially with defendants where there isn't any real "sickness", like a high school kid having sex with his girlfriend, who is only a year or so younger than he is. It will be interesting to see how these cases come out. Based on past precedent, a lot of these restrictions would seem to be in danger of being invalidated.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Forever
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Let the punishment fit the crime
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Move
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Move
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Move
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Move
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Move
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A copy of the decision, which I am not able to locate, would help in any discussions of the phrase.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
All recording devices
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So...
He'd better start vetting all his friends pretty carefully...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dumb..
What a waste of everyone involved's time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Dumb..
Too true. You can 'borrow' something you don't 'own.' (There seems to be a copyfight meme in there, but I must be too tired...)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
(not to mention that you can copy a book with that technology)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
WTF Canada!?
Hey buddy, move to Mexico...you will probably have a better standard of living and it's warmer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: WTF Canada!?
Yuh seem to hate the northern neighbors, eh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: WTF Canada!?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Banned?
So let me get this straight, he can't own a pencil and paper, VCR, PC, camera, tape recorder, or brain. Now that should be appealed under the 8th amendment!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Banned?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The judge is a cretian
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]