Swedish Indie Band Release Only One Copy Of Their Latest Song Via eBay Art Project

from the it's-the-souvenir dept

Tue, Mar 10th 2009 1:03pm — Mike Masnick

Sweden is home, of course, to the folks who run The Pirate Bay, but it's also the home of numerous indie bands and indie labels that are doing some really interesting experiments that focus on embracing the opportunities and possibilities presented by technology, rather than fighting against it all. Dan Sellberg writes in to alert us to an amusing experiment by the band Bob Hund, who is releasing a new song, called Fantastiskt, but they're doing so by selling the only copy in existence of the song on eBay as an art project:

"Fantastiskt" will be sold and delivered as an art piece comprising; the original master dubplate vinyl (the only existing copy) mounted on a real working turntable with cover art, song lyrics and monogram etched onto the lid by the artist Martin Kann.

The publisher insists that this will be the only release of this single. Talk about taking "scarcity" to a different level... Obviously, this is something of a publicity stunt, but it's not a bad one.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: bob hund, indie, music, sweden
Companies: ebay

21 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 10 Mar 2009 @ 1:13pm

As of 1:10 Pacific Time on 3/10/2009
the price is $1775

not bad and still some days left
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
some old guy, 10 Mar 2009 @ 1:14pm

Thats pretty awesome but...
But.. they should offer a free replacement cover for the record player. That nasty ass scribbling is *NOT* art. It's just nasty.

Other than that one minor detail, this is a pretty neat experiment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
David T, 10 Mar 2009 @ 1:29pm

Goodwill
Stuff like this do more than just bring in a few bucks on the side and generate buzz (which is does quite well). It also makes people *like* the band. You hear their name and smile.

This is opposed to, say, Metallica whom I loved but now curse. They hate me, a former fan, and am happy to hate them right back (and skip their concerts and CDs).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
curious george (profile), 10 Mar 2009 @ 1:56pm

Is that a USB turntable, so the buyer can easily rip the songe and make it available online? It would be interesting to see how far/fast it spreads via P2P, since it is literally starting with only one copy!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Haired Weirald, 10 Mar 2009 @ 2:00pm

This would never work for a big artist ..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Alex, 25 Oct 2009 @ 2:15pm
  
  Re: never work.
  I STRONGLY disagree. Think about how much someone would pay for the ONLY EXISTING COPY of a song by Madonna or some other huge superstar. Its the equivalent of Michael Jackson's glove, or Elvis's glasses or something. Scarcity and Supply and Demand.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
uhmno, 10 Mar 2009 @ 2:55pm

so original...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Music_for_Supermarkets

Hey Swedish band Bob Hund, 1983 called and said hello...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ehrichweiss, 10 Mar 2009 @ 3:21pm

been done..
An artist by the name of Robert Hampson(formerly of Loop, Main and several other indie bands) has been doing this for years. He sells exactly 1 copy of the song and that's all there is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 10 Mar 2009 @ 3:54pm

It will be interesting to see how fast the song becomes available online for free.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
MeMeMe, 10 Mar 2009 @ 4:21pm

Look closely at the handwritten label.... "All Rights Reversed" :-)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Matt T, 10 Mar 2009 @ 5:10pm

What if...
What if the person who bought it just destroyed it once it arrived?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
bob, 10 Mar 2009 @ 5:26pm

lol
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- bob, 10 Mar 2009 @ 5:27pm
  
  Re: lol
  All rights reserved not reversed.
  
  LOL @ MeMeMe
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
RD, 10 Mar 2009 @ 7:37pm

Radical
But check this out. Here is where you can use "free" to make money. Buy this. Then rip it. Post the rip to all the free/torrent/whatever places you can. Wait a while. Then offer the ONLY EXISTING COPY OF THE MASTER of this song. You've (hopefully) created interest by giving away a digital copy (lower quality, get it anywhere) of a scarce item (the original, and only, master copy). If you feel particularly charitable, share some of the profits back with the band. There can be no copyright violations since you own the original, and there are no "reproduction rights" as there is only a single copy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- hegemon13, 11 Mar 2009 @ 8:46am
  
  Re: Radical
  Owning the vinyl master does not imply ownership of the copyright. Copyright still belongs to the band.
  
  Now, if they were smart, they would officially grant the buyer the right to rip the track and give it away, as that would further increase interest in the band.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Weird Harold, 11 Mar 2009 @ 11:13am
    
    Re: Re: Radical
    Nice to see someone understand the difference between owning the only copy of a song and owning the rights. You must have missed the last cup of the koolaid ;)
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Alex, 25 Oct 2009 @ 2:20pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: Radical
      The only problem with this is that if they gave the rights to the person that bought it that person could make a profit by selling it... or is that a problem? Now you're not only selling the only recording in existence, but also the rights to reproduce it and sell it. Now its a potential cash cow. The whole time you're getting free publicity on top of whatever outrageous price you sold the original for. BRILLIANT!
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 11 Mar 2009 @ 6:08am

If we find this song on the torrents I suppose the band pretty much knows who to blame.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Weird Harold, 11 Mar 2009 @ 8:14am

It won't be hard to figure out who shared the song when it shows up in torrentland.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RD, 11 Mar 2009 @ 8:45am

Yeah and?
"If we find this song on the torrents I suppose the band pretty much knows who to blame."

"It won't be hard to figure out who shared the song when it shows up in torrentland."

And so? You bought AN ORIGINAL. You can do whatever you want with it. There ARE no reproduction rights. What are you going to sue over? Lost revenue? Copy infringement? THERE ARE NO OTHER COPIES! You cant infringe on a right that doesnt exist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RD, 11 Mar 2009 @ 11:54am

WRONG!
Sure but since there IS NO OTHER COPIES of the song, it is effectively a moot point. If the band were to release the song in ANY other way then sure, they have the "right" to that. Creating one singular unique copy of something, and selling it on THAT basis, is essentially creating that work FOR the buyer. Anything else is fraud. You cant have it both ways. Copyright and first-sale law does not allow you to misrepresent the conditions of the creation for sale (IE I am creating a unique, one-off item for YOU (the buyer)) and then turn around later and say "I have rights! we are making new copies available of this!" It either is or it isnt, you cant smoke-and-mirrors one way, then retract it all later on.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]