Tracking Sex Offenders With GPS Isn't A Bulletproof Solution

from the panacea? dept

Thu, Mar 12th 2009 8:34pm — Carlo Longino

A 13-year-old girl in Washington was killed last month by a registered sex offender who was being monitored with a GPS tracking device. The tragedy illustrates how such tracking devices -- whether fitted to criminals or children -- aren't magic bullets that offer total protection. In this case, the GPS device helped police corroborate the killer's confession, but it didn't stop the crime. He was being tracked passively, not in real-time, but even if he were, the fact that he was in a field wouldn't have helped anyone notice that he was trying to rape, and then killing, the girl. The devices may prove useful from an evidence standpoint, but that's only after a crime is committed. Perhaps part of the intention is that they'll also act as a deterrent, though sadly that wasn't any help in this case. Whatever the intention, it's important to remember that the devices themselves really don't offer much protection, and shouldn't be viewed as standalone solutions to preventing crime.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: crime, gps

27 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 12 Mar 2009 @ 9:51pm

Maybe if he had been locked up ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 12 Mar 2009 @ 10:48pm
  
  Re:
  That's too simple and it would be highly effective. Also, it would take away a favorite vote getter, "protecting" children from sex offenders.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Jesse McNelis, 12 Mar 2009 @ 11:24pm
  
  Re:
  "Maybe if he had been locked up ..."
  
  ...queue Minority report.
  
  The fact that this person was a sex offender and wasn't locked up means that the judge involved in his previous case thought that he was low risk enough. That judge was wrong in this particular case. But hindsight is always 20/20.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 13 Mar 2009 @ 9:16am
    
    Re: Re:
    he was a level 3 sex offender, considered the most likely to reoffend
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Wyn, 14 Mar 2009 @ 9:26am
  
  Re:
  Forget locking them up. Just kill them. Psychologists know there's no way to cure these people.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
GeneralEmergency (profile), 12 Mar 2009 @ 11:29pm

The problem with this technology is...
...that it is only half of a solution.

Had the GPS bracelet had a bluetooth receiver and the child's clothing had a bluetooth chirper sewn in, then the Sex offender's bracelet could have called the police once the child chirper had been in proximity for two solid minutes. The police could know the offender's name and address, the child's name and address and the location of where they we both together in seconds.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Reality, 13 Mar 2009 @ 12:04am
  
  Re: The problem with this technology is...
  So your solution is to tag every child with Bluetooth?
  
  Good idea, but realistically speaking? Not the best solution. I'm thinking "Helicopter mother" syndrom.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - GeneralEmergency (profile), 13 Mar 2009 @ 7:38am
    
    Re: Re: The problem with this technology is...
    No. Just the children who have parents that actually care.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - LK, 13 Mar 2009 @ 8:42am
      
      Re: Re: Re: The problem with this technology is...
      With your logic, the next step should be implanting the Bluetooth chip under skin, so the kids would be protected even if they're naked. That's a ridiculous idea!
      
      From the technological point of view, i think the better thing would be to use some bodyheat, heartbeat, brainwave sensors on the criminal's body, which are connected to this GPS-detector, so that they would react on a physiological pattern indicating that the guy is probably doing something wrong. It's obvious, that if you're raping and killing someone, your pulse would go high and some other detectable body parameters would change. And with technology like polygraphs and lie-detectors it is absolutely possible to create a "killer pattern", that would activate panic button at the police station, when the guy is involved in some suspicious action. The polygraph detectors works with much more subtle body reactions, and they're known to be quite accurate. And even if there would be some false reactions, i think it's better for a known sex-offender to be disturbed by police than for hundreds of kids to be wired with Bluetooth collars and living in a permanent fear to be raped and molested.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 Mar 2009 @ 5:52am

Gesh
Apparently the girl had a habit of risky behavior and put herself into a situation where she was exposing herself to unacceptable risk. If it wasn't this guy, it would have been someone else, and the end result would have been the same. The GPS-tracking issue is a total non-starter: the real point is to teach and train kids not to be completely utterly oblivious to the world around them and thing nothing will ever happen and that everything exists to serve them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 13 Mar 2009 @ 8:07am
  
  Re: Gesh
  "Apparently the girl had a habit of risky behavior and put herself into a situation where she was exposing herself to unacceptable risk"
  
  So, you are saying that it was her fault.
  
  Nice.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - DS, 15 Mar 2009 @ 11:31am
    
    Re: Re: Gesh
    "Her family thinks her free-spirited nature may be the reason she walked through a field popular with transients -- a field she'd been warned to stay away from and where her body was found February 22."
    
    Her fault? Not exactally, but she DID put herself in danger, a danger that she was warned about.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Man from Atlanta, 13 Mar 2009 @ 6:38am

The disconnect is instructive
There's an awful lot of back and forth over the years about the deterrent effect of punishment. The GPS makes punishment a lot more likely; the offender ignored that and the criminal justice community should take note and explore this type of data further. This might help prove once and for all that most criminals are flat out stupid and cannot think past the (very) short term.

#6 - not sure if you are writing tongue in cheek, but I am a fan of the concept that criminal justice should focus on "guardians," things that reduce propensity toward crime when they are near. A "mom" can be a guardian, as can a streetlight. People also ought to understand the concept too, as a means of staying safer.

Regardless, it's a horrible crime and wrong to blame the victim. How many of us weren't reckless teenagers?

I worry that #2 is right and sex crimes are too caught up in election politics and ill-fitting constitutional jurisprudence. More behavioral science and common sense is needed to begin to prevent them more effectively.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
n00b, 13 Mar 2009 @ 7:45am

Panacea?
Who the hell ever claimed that GPS tracking was a magic bullet that offered total protection?

Nobody. Nice fucking straw man.

Does Mike Masnick require that anyone writing for Techdirt make as comically bad arguments as he does?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased), 13 Mar 2009 @ 9:12am
  
  Re: Panacea?
  Have to agree. The GPS tracker is a deterrent for some who would rather not have to spend the rest of their lives in prison. Apparently this guy felt he needed the rape more than his freedom. Without the tracker would they have been able to pin the crime on him as easily?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - cindly, 20 May 2009 @ 11:47pm
    
    Re: Re: Panacea?
    dear sir ,
    good day .
    
    this is cindy from oxiang international limited ,in shenzhen china .Our company mainly focus on gps tracker.
    
    this kind of product is used for keep your car secure, defend your car from thief, and manage your car , also can control fleet.
    
    i am a manufacturer , our tracker is the head market .last week i have update my tracker , we have new solution now . also the price is very good .
    
    now it has more excitiong functions than before , like you can talk with the tracker , and also tracker will feedback
    
    we have Vehicle Tracker ,Motorbike Tracker ,Personal Tracker .
    
    let me give you a simple introduce of my tracker
    
    basic function is like this :
    
    1) GSM 900/1800MHZ or 850/1900 MHZ
    2) Remote Setting
    3) Three authorized number
    4) Alarm report to cell phone
    5) Locate with SMS
    6) Track by time
    7) Inquiry status
    8) Listening in
    9) Fuel control
    10) SOS alarm
    11) Anti-steal alarm
    12) Overspeed alarm
    13) Towing alarm
    14) Parking alarm
    15) Power off alarm
    16) Inquiry SIM card account balance
    17) Forward Msg
    
    and we have our own software for tracker , with the software you can get more exciting function like
    mileage report , alarm report and gas consumption report .alarm autokinetic and so on
    with my software you can control many cars(1-5000).
    
    you can set many people to control it , and a person also can control 1-5000 cars at the same time
    every body know tracker is a new prodcuts in the market , with a high end technology . so if you want to the head of the world market , pls catch time to pay more attention to it . also i am glad to help you to achieve it .
    if you intrested in it pls contact with me asap.
    If this is not in your business line,pls kindly forward it to your relative friends,thanks.
    looking forward to your reply
    best wishes to you
    cindy
    Email: sales1@oxiang.com.cn website: www.oxiang.com.cn
    MSN: oxiang1@hotmail.com Yahoo: oxiang01@yahoo.com
    Tel: 0086-755-27043175 Mob: 0086-13427952064
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 Mar 2009 @ 8:00am

castration? maybe coupled with advanced lobotomy?
low-tech, but bulletproof
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- TheStuipdOne, 13 Mar 2009 @ 9:22am
  
  Re:
  EXACTLY! Violent sex offenders should be considered to have given up the right to keep their balls. They should be imprisoned, castrated, and be required to spend some amount of time in counseling.
  
  Someone is going to cry cruel and unusual punishment at that, but I say it fits the crime perfectly, is less cruel than rape, and isn't the unusual for guys to lose their balls in accidents, because of cancer, or from a rather effective kick from the rape victim.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 13 Mar 2009 @ 10:03am
    
    Re: Re:
    "Violent sex offenders should be considered to have given up the right to keep their balls"
    
    Ummm, are there any female violent sex offenders ?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 26 Oct 2009 @ 4:35pm
  
  Re:
  Just because someone is castrated doesn't prevent them from possibly harming another child or abruptly stop their sexual desires. It lowers them, yes but doesn't make men suddenly oblivious to sex. The desire can still be there, along with the option to take testosterone to up sexual cravings.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 Mar 2009 @ 8:55am

Here is the most interesting part of this entire subject.

"Licy's family had reason to be cautious. Hager was raped twice as a teen and Licy's grandmother was kidnapped as a child, Hager said, so the family was extra vigilant with Licy and Hager's young daughters."

someone should study them to find out why they attract predators.

As far as Pedifiles go they either need to be killed or locked up for life. I perfer killed... This whole okay you've done your time but we are going to make the rest of your life a living hell by pinning a scarlet letter on you, that just waste my tax money is crap.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Eric, 13 Mar 2009 @ 8:59am

Tracking in Probation...
I work for a probation department. We've looked into these systems before. The only thing they are really for is to see if a sex offender has gone places he shouldn't. They are supposed to stay so far away from schools and playgrounds and places that serve alcohol or strip joints. You can setup zones so that if he goes into one of these areas, then you will be alerted right away.

The GPS units are pretty much only for that. So that if he is going places he shouldn't be, you can revoke his probation and put him back into jail. They are also very expensive systems and a pain in the butt to keep up w/, that's why we never went to it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gene Cavanaugh, 13 Mar 2009 @ 7:48pm

GPS tracking of criminals
While I agree overall, I object to the highly inductive reasoning used!
The quote I object to is: "Whatever the intention, it's important to remember that the devices themselves really don't offer much protection, and shouldn't be viewed as standalone solutions to preventing crime."
Hello! It failed ONE time, and we are to make a final judgement? Give me a BREAK! Devices such as this MAY OR MAY NOT "offer much protection"; we can't tell from a single case! Certainly they don't offer absolute protection, but implying that we should discard the technology because it failed once is like getting rid of autos because they sometimes are involved in fatalities! OOPS! With global warming maybe getting rid of autos IS a good idea!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
cindly li, 27 May 2009 @ 1:27am

gps tracker
we have new 2009 gps trakcer , very different from the old one in 2008 . we have our web system to show your car on map and tracker real-time if you also interested pls tell cindy sales1@oxiang.com.cn
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
icu (profile), 23 Mar 2010 @ 9:59am

priorities
After reading all the comments, it appears to me that most are impulsive reactive conclusions. Not much thought in the long view of things. In regards to sex offenders, the issue is sex deviance of the norm which falls under the laws of our communities. In this case of the little girl, it sounds more like a murder than a sex offence. In sex offences the trauma lies in the therapy following the act. In most cases life is adjusted and one can move on. Murder on the other hand is permanent, forever and cannot be unchanged in anyway. This ideology (what can we do so this doesn’t happen again), is fine for the Corporations environment. But, it doesn’t work in the human dynamics and social net works. One cannot control another’s thoughts, feelings, or behavior.
Some were alone the way this time in history has place more importance on sex offenders than on murder. Examples: drug dealer, gangs, drunk drivers, risky employers, medical field, and manufactures. The focus on the child is beginning to make me sick. My opinion, this allows one to focus on someone else rather than themselves. Personal responsibility is fading and being replaced with coherency and delusional thinking. In hard times the population needs a common fear, what is more sensitive than ones children, and how any of us don’t even think before we say, I’ll kill him if anything happens to my child? Response or reaction?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lassen County resident, 23 Sep 2010 @ 12:31pm

convicted murderer
I am a resident of Lassen County, CA and the state of CA just paroled a serial killer who got off on a technicality here. They claim we will be safe because they put a GPS ankle bracelet on him!!! Do you really think this is going to keep ANYONE safe? Well we don't! This is a very rural community and some places in the county don't even have 24/7 patrol. They have moved a fifth wheel in on state prison grounds for him & have a Correctional Officer supposedly with him at all times.

We have 2 state prisons & a Federal prison in the county so we entertain prison families & released felons as it is... but now the state wants to use us as a dumping ground for a convicted serial killer and tell us it's safe because he's wearing a GPS?? I think NOT!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 4 Apr 2014 @ 5:13am

I was gona say that no, gps trackers are not essential in deterrence as they give out limited information on the criminal except for their location. This could play as a positive or a negative attribute but will depend on the situation and/or claim against the offender. For example, that rapist was tracked in the place of the rape & murder. Was it beneficial at the time, no, but down the road when solving a case yea except it didn't help to save that child's life. However, false statements and or claims against this ex serial killer, rapist, or murder such as "oh I seen him at a school playground watching the little kids during recess" or, "he tried to attack me in the park" could be tracked using the gps monitor that this offender will have on him to pinpoint his whereabouts during the times of these reported "crimes".Yes, serial killers also need protection from the general public that is. However, the general public also needs protection from these serial killers and by having gps monitoring are we actually safe?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]