Yet Another 'Savior For The Music Industry' Shuts Down
from the down-down-down dept
Over the last few years, as the recording industry has finally started to at least come to terms with the idea that its market is changing, industry insiders keep looking for "a savior." That's a new tech-focused company that will somehow come up with the magic model that revitalizes the recording industry's revenue stream. You begin to notice a pattern with every one of these: the hype is never based on users flocking to the service. They're always based on a big PR campaign and quotes from recording industry insiders. In the early days, there was PressPlay and MusicNet. Then, there was the "new Napster" and Rhapsody. More recently, there's been SnoCap, TotalMusic, Qtrax and plenty of others. They get buzz, with the stories reporting how the industry is "supporting" these innovative new startups. But they never seem to go anywhere. The latest is SpiralFrog, which got some buzz for being "ad supported" music, which has never made much sense to us. It's now shutting down, just as pretty much all of the other "saviors" have done.And yet... file sharing sites are thriving.
It all comes down to the same thing: you don't compete with free by being lame. And, all of these "saviors" have focused on paying the record labels first, and giving users a reason to use them second (or sometimes even further down the list). The record labels are desperate for new revenue, so when they make these agreements, they're so costly that it's impossible for any of these startups to make money -- and since they're bound by all sorts of restrictions, the services tend to not be very compelling anyway. That's a recipe for disaster. Perhaps before the press declares the next major label-backed music startup the "savior" for the industry, the reporters should take a look at the littered path of failures.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: ad-supported music, ads, music, music industry, recording industry, savior
Companies: spiralfrog
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Duh. few expenses, plenty of ads, little bandwidth, no content costs. Of course they are thriving.
Take away the content, and well, they wouldn't thrive either.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If your sales and customer service revolves around our company and not the customer, you're not going to survive long unless you have government backing your business model.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Give us examples, or processes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
IS there is one? Anybody with a heartbeat can learn to reason. You really should learn to reason, it'll make a world of difference in your life.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I support eMusic and AmieStreet (both successful sites, one of which has been running for over a decade) because of their lack of DRM and reasonable prices, but they'll never be mainstream because they concentrate on independent rather than mainstream music.
Surely even your tiny brain can comprehend that there's a hole in the market between "OMG piracy!" and "let's overcharge customers and/or restrict them to use music the way WE want"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
So, Harold, I would say to you: please learn to think for yourself. "Think" being the operative word because it's quite clear you don't do much of it. Your comment here has absolutely nothing to do with the point of the article.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
My comments have everything to do exactly with the INTENT of the aricle, another attempt for Mike to bootstrap the idea that free music downloads is the only business model that is valid.
As was shown in this http://techdirt.com/articles/20090313/0115054106.shtml - the numbers show that all the free music in Canada has at best a 4-5% change in actual CD purchases and concert attendance, nothing more. The marginal increases in sales come nowhere near to supporting the idea that music should be free online. If anything, it suggests that the most fevered music fans may in fact be buying and attending LESS.
So yes, it is remarkably relevant to Mike's blog entry here. Agian, I am thinking, not just reading and nodding like a techdirt dittohead.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
File downloaders were only 23% of the total. So while they are 7% and 13% higher inside their group, in a sample of 100 people they are only 4 and 5% more likely to do either act.
Nice rant, too bad you can't read the numbers, which I think in part is what Mike is hoping for here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
from-the-well-duh-department
This wins the tautology of the year award...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: from-the-well-duh-department
Nice...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not all is lost!
TurnItUp Media has legally licensed mp3s from all 4 major labels and 1000's of independent labels/artists.
No need to worry about your music terminating. It is 100% DRM-Free.
Come at least check it out and see for yourself. TurnItUp Media - http://www.turnitupmedia.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not all is lost!
Mike said it well. These services will not work until they focus on providing what the customer wants (quick, easy, cheap music) first and then building a business model around that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Not all is lost!
The fact is nothing can really compete against P2P "Illegal" downloading. Nothing in life is truly free unless you are stealing it. Someone in the background pays for.
What Mike says is ignorance... I want a to buy a Porsche really easy, cheap and quickly.... that doesn't mean I will get it for free.
TurnItUp Media provides a user platform where people can hang out with their friends in a music community getting media points by purchasing them or earning them. They can even use the two and get discounted songs.
Instead of thinking of ways to rip off artists using P2P illegally why not trying to support them. I wonder what the would would be like if all the artist/labels decided to not do a single concert, create new music, and just fade away. I think people would begin to change their tune.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Not all is lost!
To address your issues:
>>What Mike says is ignorance... I want a to buy a Porsche really easy, cheap and quickly.... that doesn't mean I will get it for free.
There is a difference between stealing a porsche and infringing a copyright. In the first case you are stealing property but in the second you are violating a government defined right. This does not mean that people should violate copyright but you do everyone a disservice to perpetuate this myth.
Here are a couple of posts I would recommend reading on this topic:
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20030922/027245.shtml
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/2 0080219/014250290.shtml
>>the fact is nothing can really compete against P2P "Illegal" downloading. Nothing in life is truly free unless you are stealing it. Someone in the background pays for.
>>Instead of thinking of ways to rip off artists using P2P illegally why not trying to support them. I wonder what the would would be like if all the artist/labels decided to not do a single concert, create new music, and just fade away. I think people would begin to change their tune.
This is an issue of business model. Musicians' and labels will probably need to find a new way to pay for music creation. Mike has been publishing many examples of bands big and small that have adapted to this new model.
I wish you the best of luck in your new venture but realize that P2P (legal or not) is your competition. Think of the music consumer first and deliver a reason for them to use your site over the competition.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Or perhaps...
"Duh. few expenses, plenty of ads, little bandwidth, no content costs. Of course they are thriving."
Ok and why cant the labels USE this? They have EXACTLY THE SAME ability as the "pirate" sites to deliver WHAT PEOPLE WANT and HOW they want it. Just because it isnt overpriced shiny plastic discs doesnt mean its an invalid method. Nothing is stopping them but greed and control.
Oh and mankind has been making music (and stories art and everything related) since the beginning of time, and they did it without label support or expensive middlemen. Seems that all worked just fine through all that time and "art" survived and even flourished.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Or perhaps...
Why? Because they are actually PAYING to produce the content, to have the music made, to have the producers work, the writers, and all those other people required to make an actual commercial record.
Unlike the file sharing sites, they actually have significant costs involved in their operations. So expecting them do give it all away for free is just not logical.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ah yes...
Ever think that maybe the reason people have similar opinions is because they AGREE on them? Or that they come together BECAUSE they have similar points of view? Just because you agree with someone's opinion doesnt mean you are devoid of your own, or that its dependent on their opinion, or that you are brainwashed by them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just not getting it
ok...and? How does that prevent them from using the exact same MECHANISMS as the "pirates" to leverage their content AND provide a BETTER user experience? Just like EVERYONE else who hears the word "free" you assume it means the advocation of making EVERYTHING free. That is not the case. again, iTunes has PROVEN you CAN make money with these mechanisms.
"Unlike the file sharing sites, they actually have significant costs involved in their operations. So expecting them do give it all away for free is just not logical."
Only on the front end. The distribution end IS THE SAME as the "pirates." Why should someone pay $15 for a download-only copy of something when there are minimal (especially compared to a CD/DVD) costs in getting that to the customer? And then laden with DRM restrictions and poorer quality audio/video, no extra features, etc?
This is one of the big reasons why "piracy" is so popular: no restrictions. Free is a part of that, as there are always people who will take something for nothing when its offered of course, but a big chunk of this has to do with CHOICE. Just look at the Gordon Brown/Obama DVD debacle to see EXACTLY why people turn to "pirate" sites (even beyond cost issues). AVAILABILITY in a way that people WANT to use.
This isnt all about "free." Its about giving the customer what THEY want, and how, not what the PRODUCER wants. And if you say "so, the producer/studio can do whatever they want" we again get back to "yes, they CAN but that doesnt mean they SHOULD." The customer is always right, the customer is the one who spends the money, and the customer, by using "piracy" to get what they want and get around all these imposed restrictions, is TELLING them what they want. Those who dont listen and adapt will lose, and even you cant deny that. Or maybe you can, being so far up the industry's ass, you cant see anything else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pirates used to copy CDs and sell them at flea markets for pennies (and they still do in many places of the world). The distribution method is the same, but in the end, only one group is paying to make the product, the pirates just steal it. It isn't exactly the same, so the distribution methods aren't key here.
Itunes shows you can make some money, but possibly not enough for most. In fact, 99 cents is just a number now, with songs priced as low as 69 cents but most of the popular stuff priced at $1.29 and more. Also, there is a move towards bundling:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/music/news/article.cfm?c_id=264&objectid=10552045&pnu m=2
"In Mraz's case, Atlantic offered four singles and two EPs - groups of four songs or more - in the three months before the May launch of Mraz's album "We Sing. We Dance. We Steal Things." People who had already bought those were more likely to upgrade their purchases to the full album with the extras included, for $19.99 minus what they had paid already. In the first week of release, the bonus-laden album outsold the standard $9.99 one by a 3-to-1 ratio."
This reflects the true reality, that selling singles is nice (the music industry always sold singles through history, as 78s, 45's and as cd singles), but the real money is made when an album sized chunk is sold. I wouldn't be shocked to see Itunes end up with fewer singles from top acts, replaces by EPs and groupings that seperate the fans from $5 - $20 at a shot.
Why? 99 cents is nice - but there isn't enough money there.
Go look on the torrent sites, and you will see the trend. Less and less single songs getting passed around, more and more compilations, full catalogs, and full albums. It's incredibly odd to think that what the public apparently wants is what the record companies have been offering all along, they just don't want to pay for it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: WH
Good luck with that attitude.
You are going to have them right where you want them.
Not
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The customer
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
is free distribution real?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]