Kids Involved In Murder Plot? Blame The Internet And Mobile Phones!
from the say-what-now? dept
What is it with curmudgeonly journalists who jump at any opportunity to blame the internet? JJ sends in a link to a bizarre column by Christie Blatchford in Toronto's Globe and Mail where she appears to simply go off on all of "cyberspace" due to something having to do with a murder... though, the connection isn't clear at all. Perhaps this is par for the course for Blatchford, who we also mentioned last year when she wrote a nasty column slamming blogging and the idea that readers might want to comment on news stories. To her, "journalism is a monologue." Yet, this latest column seems somewhat disconnected from reality. It pieces together a few separate and somewhat unrelated things to effectively try to indict the entire internet and internet culture for the death of a teen.To be honest, Blatchford (the professional) does a pretty poor job even explaining what she's so upset about -- but she seems pretty sure that it's the internet to blame. From what I can gather, a woman (or maybe a teen? it's not clear) was killed by a teen, and another teen was convicted of first degree murder for being the "mastermind." Fair enough.
So why is the internet evil?
From what I can parse out, there are four main complaints:
- Friends of the convicted girl have set up a Facebook group supporting her, despite her conviction.
- They dared to use her real name as you would expect friends to do -- rather than obeying the Youth Criminal Justice Act, which forbids naming such juvenile offenders.
- The messages in support from her friends have terrible spelling and grammar.
- The two teens involved in the murder text messaged each other a lot -- including at least two conversations where they discuss going to the bathroom, and a few conversations where they discuss sexual acts.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: blame, christie blatchford, internet, murder
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Comments and voting: you're doing it wrong.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Comments and voting: you're doing it wrong.
I checked out her bio and she looks like a typical dumb b**ch.
You/we should all email her our comments at her email:
cblatchford@globeandmail.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
guns don't kill people...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: guns don't kill people...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Is this what you're referring to? 'Cause I count four.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Then goes on about a list of four.
I merely pointed out the fact that he at first claimed three, then immediately following was a list of four.
Not that a small discrepancy is worth arguing about, so you're right, I'm wrong, how's that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Heh. It started out as three... but became four on rereading. Fixed now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
credentials schmredentials
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: credentials schmredentials
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: credentials schmredentials
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: credentials schmredentials
And she's not fat.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I propose a one letter change to her last name. Biatchford
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is why newspapers are failing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
School is evil
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Where's Christine Blachford?
I enjoyed her prose. And thought the article was quite informative. I went to read other stories, possibly post a positive comment on her tasteful usage of the words "intercourse orgasm". But alas, she had no additional articles and comments were disabled.
I hope she gets this. Christine, your words are like sweet nectar to my lips. Your style and prose make my heart flutter, and angels sing. I think we could make a great team. Let me be the Man or a Woman with broad shoulders in your life. Please email me!
its.pat@gmail.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Okay, that was worth a chuckle.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Dangers of Paper
Yet if the plan was hatched in the head of one teenager and allegedly carried out at the hands of another, it certainly appears to have been fuelled by, and to have gathered momentum and heft to the participants, through the omnivorous chats they had on the Web.
So, if they had only talked on the phone it would have been alright or is Mr. Graham-Bell's infernal devise yet another tool in the downfall of civilization?
And there's none of that nonsense about respecting statutory publication bans in cyberspace, either....There, the girl's name so scrupulously guarded by the members of the dreaded mainstream press, because her identity is protected by the Youth Criminal Justice Act, is spelled out loud and proud and there's an accompanying full-face photograph, with our heroine showing a fair bit of skin in a low-cut top.
And if this girl's friends had posted fliers in the neighborhood, Blatchford would likely be ranting on the danger's posed by paper.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The Dangers of Paper
> it would have been alright or is Mr.
> Graham-Bell's infernal devise yet another
> tool in the downfall of civilization?
The irony is this silly woman is complaining about how they used text messages to plan the murder when it was those very messages that provided the evidence that convicted them.
If they'd used the phone or met in person, there would have been no record of their conversations and prosecution would have been significantly more difficult.
So the very "web" that this columnist complains about is what resulted in an easy and speedy conviction for this little teenage sociopath.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: School is evil
So short sighted. If there were no KIDS then no kids would have discussed the murder or committed it. I propose an immediate initiative outlawing children. They're a drain on soceities resources anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That is completely understandable. She wouldn't want someone to ruin her top notch objective reporting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh Canada!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Oh Canada!
Stupid doesn't discriminate, it's equal-opportunity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Oh Canada!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Oh Canada!
Don't bother sending her a letter, by the way. I don't think she's really literate; probably just grunts into a tape recorder and forces some staff peon to type it up for her.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
SCUMBAGS!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: SCUMBAGS!!!
So, if you see this, Weird Harold (I'm guessing you probably read SOME of these comments), I just want to commend your character in the matter in at least appropriately addressing the topics discussed, even if I disagree with your opinions most extremely.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It is to be expected that many people are going to look for things and people to blame, whether it makes sense or not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Misunderstimated
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/toronto/story/2009/03/04/rengel-trial.html
A 15-year-old girl pressured her then 17-year-old boyfriend to murder a 14-year-old girl. If nothing else, the case is about two young people with a very skewed sense of reality. As you say, these kids were obviously troubled.
But what of this "free M.T." group? Do we chalk their views up to being troubled as well? Do they have any empathy for the parents whose daughter died bleeding in the snow:
http://register.thestar.com/News/GTA/article/604759
I think the question Blatchford raises is whether the intensity of this couple's relationship was fueled by the over-the-top constant connectivity between the pair.
Like it or not, it is a valid question.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I've read most of her articles on this incident and her journalism skills seems fairly weak. She chooses to blame something she doesn't understand instead of placing it squarely where it belongs. The parents and the cops. Beyond the fact that the girl is a psychopath, her parents obviously have very little involvement in her life or at the very least they do not supervise her at all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]