White House Opens Up For Questions About The Economy

from the but-what-about-answers? dept

Wed, Mar 25th 2009 4:16pm — Mike Masnick

I've been a bit critical for the Obama administration's lack of transparency and inclusion on certain issues -- or rather, their claims of being "transparent" and "inclusive" by simply asking their mailing list to "sell" the packages put together in backrooms. I was hoping for a much more participatory process whereby citizens actually could take part a bit earlier in the process. So, it's good to see a step in the right direction, as the White House has announced its Open For Questions initiatives (thanks to everyone who sent this in). The site lets people ask questions of the president, and lets people see and vote on each other's questions. The President will then answer a few of the "top" questions.

This is definitely a nice thing to add, but I'm hopeful that it ends up going further. At this point, it seems like nothing much more than a glorified suggestion/Q&A box. Rather than involving the community to tackle the questions raised, it simply gives them to the President to answer back. Real participation is about allowing the community to help out -- not just pass big questions up to the top. Obviously, it's still quite early in the administration, so hopefully we'll see more participatory tools on the way as well. This is definitely a good step -- and I don't mean to take away from it. But, I'm going to keep pushing for further participation and further transparency because I think it could be quite powerful and transformative.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: obama, participation, q&a, transparency

22 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Weird Harold's former #5 fan, 25 Mar 2009 @ 4:50pm

Question 1 - When did "trillion" become the new "billion"?

A trillion here, a trillion there, and pretty soon you're talking about real money
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not Impressed, 25 Mar 2009 @ 4:52pm

More rhetoric...
You have a better chance of getting struck by lightning than to have him answer your question.

Unless you manage to hack into his teleprompter...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Weird Harold's former #5 fan, 25 Mar 2009 @ 4:54pm

Since he can't seem to do even a simple news conference without his trusty teleprompter, that would be an infamous hack indeed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Mar 2009 @ 4:57pm

No matter how you cut the cheese, it is better than having Palin in there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 25 Mar 2009 @ 8:00pm
  
  Re:
  Palin 2012. Get used to it foo...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anyonymous Douchebag, 26 Mar 2009 @ 10:21am
  
  Sure
  Yep, we certainly wouldn't want Palin around Washington. Why would we ever want an executive level politician who has actually had a balanced budget anywhere near that cesspool known as DC.
  
  How many trillions in debt will it take for you to wake up Coward?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Matt, 25 Mar 2009 @ 5:27pm

sham
I'll bet anything its a complete sham, mostly because there's no way to verify how many people "legitimately" wanted a question to be up top.

I sadly wouldn't be surprised if we find a giant amount of sock puppeting going onto lower questions they don't want to talk about, etc.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Steve P., 25 Mar 2009 @ 5:29pm

Question 2
Dear President,

Is "The Obama Deception" Movie true?

Sincerely,

America
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yakko Warner, 25 Mar 2009 @ 5:34pm

Operators are standing by
If you have any ideas about how to fix the economy, just call. I'll be here all day. If we use your idea, you'll get ten million dollars. If two of you come up with the same idea, you'll get five million dollars each...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Art, 25 Mar 2009 @ 5:44pm

10 questions at a time
This is as bad as that stupid google product, sorry I forget the name, that only lets you move through questions ten at a time. No go to first. No go to last. No go to page. Where's they find their developers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Manny, 25 Mar 2009 @ 10:11pm

the mewling of girly men
Whine whine whine. He used a teleprompter for his opening statement! He's so arrogant he answers questions in complete paragraphs instead of in sound bites I can understand! He's priming the pump to avoid a depression after my heroic marketworshippers concocted a $50 trillion unregulated credit default swap market that brought the financial system to its knees! He won't answer my question about why he's stoopid! He's a socialist! He's not angry enough about the bonuses! He's too angry! His wife has big arms! Whine whine whine.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
col, 26 Mar 2009 @ 4:20am

When this was tried in the UK
the top questions were simply ignored if the incumbent didn't feel like addressing them. It'll be interesting to see if Pres-O actually has the courage of his convictions, or if he'll apply the Blair method and torpedo any questions he doesn't like the look of.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don, 26 Mar 2009 @ 5:25am

Stop the bleeding
I'm sorry but the wind-bags in Washington cant get us out of this mess. They have no common sense or street smarts.To stop the bleeding you apply pressure directly to the wound.The tax payers should get the bail-out not the banks or wall street. It's the tax payers money to begin with.Please return it so we can buy products and stimulate the economy. Respectfully, Don
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 26 Mar 2009 @ 6:58am

Answering questions is not being inclusive. Inclusive is working with people on the solutions from the beginning, not answering the questions after the fact.

This is an old tried and true consulting trick. It is nothing more than a moderated workshop, led by the consultant. You bring a bunch of people in a room and talk to them about the problem and then guide them to the solution that you have already came up with. When the process is done, the people in the room actually believe that they came up with the solution and have more buy in.

It is actually a very good technique if you do it right. Of course, it is a sham, but it works.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gene Cavanaugh, 26 Mar 2009 @ 9:00am

Transparency in government
You really nailed this one, Mike! I agree completely. It is a step in the right direction, but still just a glorified Q/A, as you said.
I started to participate, but when I realized there was no discussion involved, opted out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fung Ngo, 26 Mar 2009 @ 9:02am

Sock puppets?
Really? The Hope n Change (or is that Rope n Chains) folks would stoop to that? I mean, really, it's not like they accepted illegal foreign donations on their campaign website or anything, is it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 26 Mar 2009 @ 2:38pm

Pain 2012
I look forward to the comedy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Larry Dillon, 26 Mar 2009 @ 2:49pm

President Obama
Mr. president,We voted for you and believe in your leadership 100% WE PRAY BOTH PARTIES DEM.&Rep. parties would get their priorities together and support you so this economy will turn to the point putting americans to work faster and projects viable to the most needed project to the mondaine means jobs. We are lucky my wife workd for Wal-Mart 16yrs. we have insurence and benifits allowing us to live in Alaska,and now here in Kailua Kona,Hawaii. Your leadership is driven to represent the people of America and you have accomplished a lot already and do not slow down sir. We need your leadership and pray for your safety and your families safety harm not to touch you in anyway. God Bless you Mr. president go forward undonted with an open mind yours tasks are monumentel but win able. I could not handle this task and would not wish this on anyone,God has you on this path and you must keep vigulent as Mr. Lincoln much is to be done and you remaine focused with telopromter and all at your means your heart is for us the American public we do apprediate how and why your goals are moving forward. Mr. King's I have a dream for all Gods children and you are it the dream,leader of compassion and love. God Bless You Mr. president and w/love Larry & Pam Dillon
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Carlos R, Salvatori, 26 Mar 2009 @ 2:55pm

taxes
President Obama said "any body making less than 50.000 dolars will not pay taxes"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
anymouse, 26 Mar 2009 @ 4:03pm

Well, not so open anymore....
"Submit a question - No longer accepting new questions at this time."

I went to take a look and guess what, no longer accepting questions, guess they answered them all already. Time to go home, nothing to see here folks, move along.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
mary, 4 Apr 2009 @ 6:45pm

Why in the world would a President go to Europe and call the people of America arrogant? The only arrogant people in the United State is President Obama and Nancy. We were told by Nancy that the Dem. won and Rep. lost and we need to deal with it (what a arrogant remark).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
mary, 4 Apr 2009 @ 6:45pm

Why in the world would a President go to Europe and call the people of America arrogant? The only arrogant people in the United State is President Obama and Nancy. We were told by Nancy that the Dem. won and Rep. lost and we need to deal with it (what a arrogant remark).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]